Hezekiah B. Sawa, Melike Babucci, Jan Keller, Charlotte Platzer Björkman, Nuru R. Mlyuka, Margaret E. Samiji
{"title":"后界面钝化 Al2O3 对带有掺氟二氧化锡背触点的双面沸石基太阳能电池性能的影响","authors":"Hezekiah B. Sawa, Melike Babucci, Jan Keller, Charlotte Platzer Björkman, Nuru R. Mlyuka, Margaret E. Samiji","doi":"10.1002/pssb.202400080","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Herein, ultrathin Al<jats:sub>2</jats:sub>O<jats:sub>3</jats:sub> is investigated as a rear interface passivation layer for kesterite solar cells with F:SnO<jats:sub>2</jats:sub> (FTO) back contact for potential performance improvement. On the passivation layer, a thin Mo layer is deposited to improve the FTO's ohmicity. Further, NaF is evaporated on the copper zinc tin sulfide (CZTS) precursors to create openings at the passivation layer and achieve Na‐induced benefits in the absorber. The CZTS absorbers deposited directly on the Al<jats:sub>2</jats:sub>O<jats:sub>3</jats:sub>‐coated FTO peel off, while those with Mo interlayer do not. For pure sulfide kesterite devices, the Al<jats:sub>2</jats:sub>O<jats:sub>3</jats:sub> layer reduces the short‐circuit current density (<jats:italic>J</jats:italic><jats:sub>SC</jats:sub>), resulting in poor device efficiency. On the other hand, significantly higher <jats:italic>J</jats:italic><jats:sub>SC</jats:sub> is realized for mixed sulfide and selenide kesterite devices with Al<jats:sub>2</jats:sub>O<jats:sub>3</jats:sub> passivation layer, with the current density–voltage curve suggesting a reduced barrier height at the rear interface. As a result, the efficiency is improved from 1.5% for devices without Al<jats:sub>2</jats:sub>O<jats:sub>3</jats:sub> to 4.6% for those with Al<jats:sub>2</jats:sub>O<jats:sub>3</jats:sub>. Likewise, improved external quantum efficiency response is observed in the devices with passivation layer for backside and frontside illumination. Therefore, contribution of Al<jats:sub>2</jats:sub>O<jats:sub>3</jats:sub> passivation layer to the performance of kesterite‐based solar cells is evident from the results of this study.","PeriodicalId":20406,"journal":{"name":"Physica Status Solidi B-basic Solid State Physics","volume":"31 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.5000,"publicationDate":"2024-07-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Effects of Al2O3 Rear Interface Passivation on the Performance of Bifacial Kesterite‐Based Solar Cells with Fluorine‐Doped Tin Dioxide Back Contact\",\"authors\":\"Hezekiah B. Sawa, Melike Babucci, Jan Keller, Charlotte Platzer Björkman, Nuru R. Mlyuka, Margaret E. Samiji\",\"doi\":\"10.1002/pssb.202400080\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Herein, ultrathin Al<jats:sub>2</jats:sub>O<jats:sub>3</jats:sub> is investigated as a rear interface passivation layer for kesterite solar cells with F:SnO<jats:sub>2</jats:sub> (FTO) back contact for potential performance improvement. On the passivation layer, a thin Mo layer is deposited to improve the FTO's ohmicity. Further, NaF is evaporated on the copper zinc tin sulfide (CZTS) precursors to create openings at the passivation layer and achieve Na‐induced benefits in the absorber. The CZTS absorbers deposited directly on the Al<jats:sub>2</jats:sub>O<jats:sub>3</jats:sub>‐coated FTO peel off, while those with Mo interlayer do not. For pure sulfide kesterite devices, the Al<jats:sub>2</jats:sub>O<jats:sub>3</jats:sub> layer reduces the short‐circuit current density (<jats:italic>J</jats:italic><jats:sub>SC</jats:sub>), resulting in poor device efficiency. On the other hand, significantly higher <jats:italic>J</jats:italic><jats:sub>SC</jats:sub> is realized for mixed sulfide and selenide kesterite devices with Al<jats:sub>2</jats:sub>O<jats:sub>3</jats:sub> passivation layer, with the current density–voltage curve suggesting a reduced barrier height at the rear interface. As a result, the efficiency is improved from 1.5% for devices without Al<jats:sub>2</jats:sub>O<jats:sub>3</jats:sub> to 4.6% for those with Al<jats:sub>2</jats:sub>O<jats:sub>3</jats:sub>. Likewise, improved external quantum efficiency response is observed in the devices with passivation layer for backside and frontside illumination. Therefore, contribution of Al<jats:sub>2</jats:sub>O<jats:sub>3</jats:sub> passivation layer to the performance of kesterite‐based solar cells is evident from the results of this study.\",\"PeriodicalId\":20406,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Physica Status Solidi B-basic Solid State Physics\",\"volume\":\"31 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.5000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-07-10\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Physica Status Solidi B-basic Solid State Physics\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"101\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1002/pssb.202400080\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"物理与天体物理\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"PHYSICS, CONDENSED MATTER\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Physica Status Solidi B-basic Solid State Physics","FirstCategoryId":"101","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1002/pssb.202400080","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"物理与天体物理","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"PHYSICS, CONDENSED MATTER","Score":null,"Total":0}
Effects of Al2O3 Rear Interface Passivation on the Performance of Bifacial Kesterite‐Based Solar Cells with Fluorine‐Doped Tin Dioxide Back Contact
Herein, ultrathin Al2O3 is investigated as a rear interface passivation layer for kesterite solar cells with F:SnO2 (FTO) back contact for potential performance improvement. On the passivation layer, a thin Mo layer is deposited to improve the FTO's ohmicity. Further, NaF is evaporated on the copper zinc tin sulfide (CZTS) precursors to create openings at the passivation layer and achieve Na‐induced benefits in the absorber. The CZTS absorbers deposited directly on the Al2O3‐coated FTO peel off, while those with Mo interlayer do not. For pure sulfide kesterite devices, the Al2O3 layer reduces the short‐circuit current density (JSC), resulting in poor device efficiency. On the other hand, significantly higher JSC is realized for mixed sulfide and selenide kesterite devices with Al2O3 passivation layer, with the current density–voltage curve suggesting a reduced barrier height at the rear interface. As a result, the efficiency is improved from 1.5% for devices without Al2O3 to 4.6% for those with Al2O3. Likewise, improved external quantum efficiency response is observed in the devices with passivation layer for backside and frontside illumination. Therefore, contribution of Al2O3 passivation layer to the performance of kesterite‐based solar cells is evident from the results of this study.
期刊介绍:
physica status solidi is devoted to the thorough peer review and the rapid publication of new and important results in all fields of solid state and materials physics, from basic science to applications and devices. Being among the largest and most important international publications, the pss journals publish review articles, letters and original work as well as special issues and conference contributions.
physica status solidi b – basic solid state physics is devoted to topics such as theoretical and experimental investigations of the atomistic and electronic structure of solids in general, phase transitions, electronic and optical properties of low-dimensional, nano-scale, strongly correlated, or disordered systems, superconductivity, magnetism, ferroelectricity etc.