评估日本老年人的住房无障碍问题:采用专家小组方法对日本住房促进因素进行跨文化调整并确定其内容有效性

IF 1.8 3区 经济学 Q3 ENVIRONMENTAL STUDIES Journal of Housing and the Built Environment Pub Date : 2024-07-11 DOI:10.1007/s10901-024-10145-2
Rumiko Tsuchiya-Ito, Björn Slaug, Tomonori Sano, Miki Tajima, Sakiko Itoh, Kazuaki Uda, Takashi Yamanaka, Susanne Iwarsson
{"title":"评估日本老年人的住房无障碍问题:采用专家小组方法对日本住房促进因素进行跨文化调整并确定其内容有效性","authors":"Rumiko Tsuchiya-Ito, Björn Slaug, Tomonori Sano, Miki Tajima, Sakiko Itoh, Kazuaki Uda, Takashi Yamanaka, Susanne Iwarsson","doi":"10.1007/s10901-024-10145-2","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>Accessible housing plays a crucial role in supporting aging in place, yet Japan lacks adequate tools for assessing housing accessibility among older adults. This study describes the process of translating and adapting the environmental component checklist of the Swedish Housing Enabler instrument for valid use in Japan. During translation to the Japanese language, technical terms and specifications were adjusted to match Japanese standards and guidelines. To validate the content of the instrument’s checklist for the environmental component, an expert panel including occupational therapists, architects, and care managers was used. Relevance in a Japanese housing context was rated for all items on a scale from 1 to 4 (higher = more relevant), and a content validity index (0–1) was calculated for each item. After consensus discussions, the expert panel suggested revisions, including removal and addition of items, to better capture the characteristics of Japanese housing and building design. A final checklist of 261 items for the Japanese Housing Enabler was suggested. While 15 items were removed due to their lack of relevance to Japanese housing, 115 items were added. More than 90% of the items had a content validity index that exceeded the recommended threshold for relevance (≥ 0.78). Although the study results support the cultural relevance and content validity of this new instrument for assessing housing accessibility in Japan, the large number of items may compromise its feasibility. Aspects such as feasibility, criterion-related validity, and interrater reliability require investigation.</p>","PeriodicalId":47558,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Housing and the Built Environment","volume":"55 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.8000,"publicationDate":"2024-07-11","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Assessing housing accessibility issues for older adults in Japan: an expert panel approach to cross-cultural adaptation and content validity of the Japanese housing enabler\",\"authors\":\"Rumiko Tsuchiya-Ito, Björn Slaug, Tomonori Sano, Miki Tajima, Sakiko Itoh, Kazuaki Uda, Takashi Yamanaka, Susanne Iwarsson\",\"doi\":\"10.1007/s10901-024-10145-2\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p>Accessible housing plays a crucial role in supporting aging in place, yet Japan lacks adequate tools for assessing housing accessibility among older adults. This study describes the process of translating and adapting the environmental component checklist of the Swedish Housing Enabler instrument for valid use in Japan. During translation to the Japanese language, technical terms and specifications were adjusted to match Japanese standards and guidelines. To validate the content of the instrument’s checklist for the environmental component, an expert panel including occupational therapists, architects, and care managers was used. Relevance in a Japanese housing context was rated for all items on a scale from 1 to 4 (higher = more relevant), and a content validity index (0–1) was calculated for each item. After consensus discussions, the expert panel suggested revisions, including removal and addition of items, to better capture the characteristics of Japanese housing and building design. A final checklist of 261 items for the Japanese Housing Enabler was suggested. While 15 items were removed due to their lack of relevance to Japanese housing, 115 items were added. More than 90% of the items had a content validity index that exceeded the recommended threshold for relevance (≥ 0.78). Although the study results support the cultural relevance and content validity of this new instrument for assessing housing accessibility in Japan, the large number of items may compromise its feasibility. Aspects such as feasibility, criterion-related validity, and interrater reliability require investigation.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":47558,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Housing and the Built Environment\",\"volume\":\"55 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.8000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-07-11\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Housing and the Built Environment\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"96\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1007/s10901-024-10145-2\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"经济学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"ENVIRONMENTAL STUDIES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Housing and the Built Environment","FirstCategoryId":"96","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s10901-024-10145-2","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"经济学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"ENVIRONMENTAL STUDIES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

无障碍住房在支持居家养老方面发挥着至关重要的作用,但日本缺乏评估老年人住房无障碍程度的适当工具。本研究描述了将瑞典住房使能工具中的环境成分检查表翻译和改编为在日本有效使用的过程。在翻译成日语的过程中,对技术术语和规格进行了调整,以符合日本的标准和指南。为了验证该工具环境部分核对表的内容,使用了一个包括职业治疗师、建筑师和护理经理在内的专家小组。所有项目在日本住房环境中的相关性均按 1 到 4 分(越高 = 越相关)进行评分,并计算出每个项目的内容效度指数(0-1)。经过一致讨论,专家小组提出了修改建议,包括删除和增加项目,以更好地反映日本住房和建筑设计的特点。最终提出了一份包含 261 个项目的日本住房使能因素核对表。有 15 个项目因与日本住房缺乏相关性而被删除,同时增加了 115 个项目。超过 90% 的项目的内容效度指数超过了建议的相关性阈值(≥ 0.78)。尽管研究结果支持了这一用于评估日本住房可及性的新工具的文化相关性和内容有效性,但大量的项目可能会影响其可行性。需要对可行性、标准相关有效性和施测者间可靠性等方面进行调查。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

摘要图片

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Assessing housing accessibility issues for older adults in Japan: an expert panel approach to cross-cultural adaptation and content validity of the Japanese housing enabler

Accessible housing plays a crucial role in supporting aging in place, yet Japan lacks adequate tools for assessing housing accessibility among older adults. This study describes the process of translating and adapting the environmental component checklist of the Swedish Housing Enabler instrument for valid use in Japan. During translation to the Japanese language, technical terms and specifications were adjusted to match Japanese standards and guidelines. To validate the content of the instrument’s checklist for the environmental component, an expert panel including occupational therapists, architects, and care managers was used. Relevance in a Japanese housing context was rated for all items on a scale from 1 to 4 (higher = more relevant), and a content validity index (0–1) was calculated for each item. After consensus discussions, the expert panel suggested revisions, including removal and addition of items, to better capture the characteristics of Japanese housing and building design. A final checklist of 261 items for the Japanese Housing Enabler was suggested. While 15 items were removed due to their lack of relevance to Japanese housing, 115 items were added. More than 90% of the items had a content validity index that exceeded the recommended threshold for relevance (≥ 0.78). Although the study results support the cultural relevance and content validity of this new instrument for assessing housing accessibility in Japan, the large number of items may compromise its feasibility. Aspects such as feasibility, criterion-related validity, and interrater reliability require investigation.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
3.70
自引率
10.50%
发文量
63
期刊介绍: The Journal of Housing and the Built Environment is a scholarly journal presenting the results of scientific research and new developments in policy and practice to a diverse readership of specialists, practitioners and policy-makers. This refereed journal covers the fields of housing, spatial planning, building and urban development. The journal guarantees high scientific quality by a double blind review procedure. Next to that, the editorial board discusses each article as well. Leading scholars in the field of housing, spatial planning and urban development publish regularly in Journal of Housing and the Built Environment. The journal publishes articles from scientists all over the world, both Western and non-Western, providing a truly international platform for developments in both theory and practice in the fields of housing, spatial planning, building and urban development. Journal of Housing and the Built Environment (HBE) has a wide scope and includes all topics dealing with people-environment relations. Topics concern social relations within the built environment as well as the physicals component of the built environment. As such the journal brings together social science and engineering. HBE is of interest for scientists like housing researchers, social geographers, (urban) planners and architects. Furthermore it presents a forum for practitioners to present their experiences in new developments on policy and practice. Because of its unique structure of research articles and policy and practice contributions, HBE provides a forum where science and practice can be confronted. Finally, each volume of HBE contains one special issue, in which recent developments on one particular topic are discussed in depth. The aim of Journal of Housing and the Built Environment is to give international exposure to recent research and policy and practice developments on the built environment and thereby open up a forum wherein re searchers can exchange ideas and develop contacts. In this way HBE seeks to enhance the quality of research in the field and disseminate the results to a wider audience. Its scope is intended to interest scientists as well as policy-makers, both in government and in organizations dealing with housing and urban issues.
期刊最新文献
Sharing housing: a solution to – or a reflection of – housing inequality? The mediating role of sense of place in relationship between localized social ties and residential satisfaction Rules of organized chaos: patterns in self-help incremental housing in Kampung Cikini, Jakarta Green spaces in Polish large prefabricated housing estates developed in the socialist era Housing cooperatives in Egypt: challenges, constraints, and solutions
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1