Jingyuan Wu, Xiaodi Ruan, Elizabeth McNeer, Katelyn M. Rossow, Leena Choi
{"title":"利用基于转换器的模型开发自然语言处理系统,用于检测电子健康记录中的药物不良事件","authors":"Jingyuan Wu, Xiaodi Ruan, Elizabeth McNeer, Katelyn M. Rossow, Leena Choi","doi":"10.1101/2024.07.09.24310100","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Objective:\nTo develop a transformer-based natural language processing (NLP) system for detecting adverse drug events (ADEs) from clinical notes in electronic health records (EHRs).\nMaterials and Methods:\nWe fine-tuned BERT Short-Formers and Clinical-Longformer using the processed dataset of the 2018 National NLP Clinical Challenges (n2c2) shared task Track 2. We investigated two data processing methods, window-based and split-based approaches, to find an optimal processing method. We evaluated the generalization capabilities on a dataset extracted from Vanderbilt University Medical Center (VUMC) EHRs.\nResults:\nOn the n2c2 dataset, the best average macro F-scores of 0.832 and 0.868 were achieved using a 15-word window with PubMedBERT and a 10-chunk split with Clinical-Longformer. On the VUMC dataset, the best average macro F-scores of 0.720 and 0.786 were achieved using a 4-chunk split with PubMedBERT and Clinical-Longformer.\nDiscussion:\nOur study provided a comparative analysis of data processing methods. The fine-tuned transformer models showed good performance for ADE-related tasks. Especially, Clinical-Longformer model with split-based approach had a great potential for practical implementation of ADE detection. While the token limit was crucial, the chunk size also significantly influenced model performance, even when the text length was within the token limit.\nConclusion:\nWe provided guidance on model development, including data processing methods for ADE detection from clinical notes using transformer-based models. Our results on two datasets indicated that data processing methods and models should be carefully selected based on the type of clinical notes and the allocation trade-offs of human and computational power in annotation and model fine-tuning.","PeriodicalId":501454,"journal":{"name":"medRxiv - Health Informatics","volume":"31 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-07-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Developing a natural language processing system using transformer-based models for adverse drug event detection in electronic health records\",\"authors\":\"Jingyuan Wu, Xiaodi Ruan, Elizabeth McNeer, Katelyn M. Rossow, Leena Choi\",\"doi\":\"10.1101/2024.07.09.24310100\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Objective:\\nTo develop a transformer-based natural language processing (NLP) system for detecting adverse drug events (ADEs) from clinical notes in electronic health records (EHRs).\\nMaterials and Methods:\\nWe fine-tuned BERT Short-Formers and Clinical-Longformer using the processed dataset of the 2018 National NLP Clinical Challenges (n2c2) shared task Track 2. We investigated two data processing methods, window-based and split-based approaches, to find an optimal processing method. We evaluated the generalization capabilities on a dataset extracted from Vanderbilt University Medical Center (VUMC) EHRs.\\nResults:\\nOn the n2c2 dataset, the best average macro F-scores of 0.832 and 0.868 were achieved using a 15-word window with PubMedBERT and a 10-chunk split with Clinical-Longformer. On the VUMC dataset, the best average macro F-scores of 0.720 and 0.786 were achieved using a 4-chunk split with PubMedBERT and Clinical-Longformer.\\nDiscussion:\\nOur study provided a comparative analysis of data processing methods. The fine-tuned transformer models showed good performance for ADE-related tasks. Especially, Clinical-Longformer model with split-based approach had a great potential for practical implementation of ADE detection. While the token limit was crucial, the chunk size also significantly influenced model performance, even when the text length was within the token limit.\\nConclusion:\\nWe provided guidance on model development, including data processing methods for ADE detection from clinical notes using transformer-based models. Our results on two datasets indicated that data processing methods and models should be carefully selected based on the type of clinical notes and the allocation trade-offs of human and computational power in annotation and model fine-tuning.\",\"PeriodicalId\":501454,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"medRxiv - Health Informatics\",\"volume\":\"31 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-07-10\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"medRxiv - Health Informatics\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1101/2024.07.09.24310100\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"medRxiv - Health Informatics","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1101/2024.07.09.24310100","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
Developing a natural language processing system using transformer-based models for adverse drug event detection in electronic health records
Objective:
To develop a transformer-based natural language processing (NLP) system for detecting adverse drug events (ADEs) from clinical notes in electronic health records (EHRs).
Materials and Methods:
We fine-tuned BERT Short-Formers and Clinical-Longformer using the processed dataset of the 2018 National NLP Clinical Challenges (n2c2) shared task Track 2. We investigated two data processing methods, window-based and split-based approaches, to find an optimal processing method. We evaluated the generalization capabilities on a dataset extracted from Vanderbilt University Medical Center (VUMC) EHRs.
Results:
On the n2c2 dataset, the best average macro F-scores of 0.832 and 0.868 were achieved using a 15-word window with PubMedBERT and a 10-chunk split with Clinical-Longformer. On the VUMC dataset, the best average macro F-scores of 0.720 and 0.786 were achieved using a 4-chunk split with PubMedBERT and Clinical-Longformer.
Discussion:
Our study provided a comparative analysis of data processing methods. The fine-tuned transformer models showed good performance for ADE-related tasks. Especially, Clinical-Longformer model with split-based approach had a great potential for practical implementation of ADE detection. While the token limit was crucial, the chunk size also significantly influenced model performance, even when the text length was within the token limit.
Conclusion:
We provided guidance on model development, including data processing methods for ADE detection from clinical notes using transformer-based models. Our results on two datasets indicated that data processing methods and models should be carefully selected based on the type of clinical notes and the allocation trade-offs of human and computational power in annotation and model fine-tuning.