{"title":"远离特征的 Motivic Steenrod 问题","authors":"Toni Annala, Tobias Shin","doi":"arxiv-2407.07194","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"In topology, the Steenrod problem asks whether every singular homology class\nis the pushforward of the fundamental class of a closed oriented manifold.\nHere, we introduce an analogous question in algebraic geometry: is every\nelement on the Chow line of the motivic cohomology of $X$ the pushforward of a\nfundamental class along a projective derived-lci morphism? If $X$ is a smooth\nvariety over a field of characteristic $p \\geq 0$, then a positive answer to\nthis question follows up to $p$-torsion from resolution of singularities by\nalterations. However, if $X$ is singular, then this is no longer necessarily\nso: we give examples of motivic cohomology classes of a singular scheme $X$\nthat are not $p$-torsion and are not expressible as such pushforwards. A\nconsequence of our result is that the Chow ring of a singular variety cannot be\nexpressed as a quotient of its algebraic cobordism ring, as suggested by the\nfirst-named-author in his thesis.","PeriodicalId":501143,"journal":{"name":"arXiv - MATH - K-Theory and Homology","volume":"231 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-07-09","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Motivic Steenrod problem away from the characteristic\",\"authors\":\"Toni Annala, Tobias Shin\",\"doi\":\"arxiv-2407.07194\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"In topology, the Steenrod problem asks whether every singular homology class\\nis the pushforward of the fundamental class of a closed oriented manifold.\\nHere, we introduce an analogous question in algebraic geometry: is every\\nelement on the Chow line of the motivic cohomology of $X$ the pushforward of a\\nfundamental class along a projective derived-lci morphism? If $X$ is a smooth\\nvariety over a field of characteristic $p \\\\geq 0$, then a positive answer to\\nthis question follows up to $p$-torsion from resolution of singularities by\\nalterations. However, if $X$ is singular, then this is no longer necessarily\\nso: we give examples of motivic cohomology classes of a singular scheme $X$\\nthat are not $p$-torsion and are not expressible as such pushforwards. A\\nconsequence of our result is that the Chow ring of a singular variety cannot be\\nexpressed as a quotient of its algebraic cobordism ring, as suggested by the\\nfirst-named-author in his thesis.\",\"PeriodicalId\":501143,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"arXiv - MATH - K-Theory and Homology\",\"volume\":\"231 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-07-09\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"arXiv - MATH - K-Theory and Homology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/arxiv-2407.07194\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"arXiv - MATH - K-Theory and Homology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/arxiv-2407.07194","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
Motivic Steenrod problem away from the characteristic
In topology, the Steenrod problem asks whether every singular homology class
is the pushforward of the fundamental class of a closed oriented manifold.
Here, we introduce an analogous question in algebraic geometry: is every
element on the Chow line of the motivic cohomology of $X$ the pushforward of a
fundamental class along a projective derived-lci morphism? If $X$ is a smooth
variety over a field of characteristic $p \geq 0$, then a positive answer to
this question follows up to $p$-torsion from resolution of singularities by
alterations. However, if $X$ is singular, then this is no longer necessarily
so: we give examples of motivic cohomology classes of a singular scheme $X$
that are not $p$-torsion and are not expressible as such pushforwards. A
consequence of our result is that the Chow ring of a singular variety cannot be
expressed as a quotient of its algebraic cobordism ring, as suggested by the
first-named-author in his thesis.