Sanaz Pournajaf, Carlo Damiani, Francesco Agostini, Giovanni Morone, Stefania Proietti, Roberto Casale, Marco Franceschini, Michela Goffredo
{"title":"识别下肢截肢者幻肢痛、残肢痛及两者的判别因素:一项横断面研究。","authors":"Sanaz Pournajaf, Carlo Damiani, Francesco Agostini, Giovanni Morone, Stefania Proietti, Roberto Casale, Marco Franceschini, Michela Goffredo","doi":"10.1097/MRR.0000000000000634","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Postamputation pain is a common condition in patients with lower limb amputation (LLA), which compromises amputees' rehabilitation, use of the prosthesis, and quality of life. The aim of our study was to investigate the prevalence of phantom limb pain (PLP), residual limb pain (RLP), or both types of pain among individuals with LLA, and to identify the factors associated with the presence of one type of pain versus the other. Patients who underwent amputation for traumatic or vascular reasons and who reported on RLP or PLP were analyzed and divided into three groups: PLP, RLP, or a group of subjects that presented both pains. We searched for factors that affect the occurrence of limb pain using univariate analyses, followed by multinomial logistic regression. Among the 282 participants with transtibial and transfemoral amputations, 192 participants (150 male and 42 female) presented PLP, RLP, or both types of pain, while 90 participants declared to perceive no pain. The estimated prevalence of any type of pain after transfemoral and transtibial amputation was therefore 68% (27% PLP, 10% RLP, and 31% both). Among the studied characteristics, only amputation level was associated with the type of pain ( P = 0.001). Multinomial logistic regression identified transfemoral amputation as the only statistically significant predictor for PLP (odds ratio = 2.8; P = 0.002). Hence, it was estimated that individuals with transfemoral amputation have nearly three times higher odds of experiencing PLP compared with those with transtibial amputation.</p>","PeriodicalId":14301,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Rehabilitation Research","volume":" ","pages":"214-220"},"PeriodicalIF":1.5000,"publicationDate":"2024-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11424063/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Identifying discriminant factors between phantom limb pain, residual limb pain, and both in people with lower limb amputations: a cross-sectional study.\",\"authors\":\"Sanaz Pournajaf, Carlo Damiani, Francesco Agostini, Giovanni Morone, Stefania Proietti, Roberto Casale, Marco Franceschini, Michela Goffredo\",\"doi\":\"10.1097/MRR.0000000000000634\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>Postamputation pain is a common condition in patients with lower limb amputation (LLA), which compromises amputees' rehabilitation, use of the prosthesis, and quality of life. The aim of our study was to investigate the prevalence of phantom limb pain (PLP), residual limb pain (RLP), or both types of pain among individuals with LLA, and to identify the factors associated with the presence of one type of pain versus the other. Patients who underwent amputation for traumatic or vascular reasons and who reported on RLP or PLP were analyzed and divided into three groups: PLP, RLP, or a group of subjects that presented both pains. We searched for factors that affect the occurrence of limb pain using univariate analyses, followed by multinomial logistic regression. Among the 282 participants with transtibial and transfemoral amputations, 192 participants (150 male and 42 female) presented PLP, RLP, or both types of pain, while 90 participants declared to perceive no pain. The estimated prevalence of any type of pain after transfemoral and transtibial amputation was therefore 68% (27% PLP, 10% RLP, and 31% both). Among the studied characteristics, only amputation level was associated with the type of pain ( P = 0.001). Multinomial logistic regression identified transfemoral amputation as the only statistically significant predictor for PLP (odds ratio = 2.8; P = 0.002). Hence, it was estimated that individuals with transfemoral amputation have nearly three times higher odds of experiencing PLP compared with those with transtibial amputation.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":14301,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"International Journal of Rehabilitation Research\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"214-220\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.5000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-09-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11424063/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"International Journal of Rehabilitation Research\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1097/MRR.0000000000000634\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2024/7/15 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"REHABILITATION\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal of Rehabilitation Research","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1097/MRR.0000000000000634","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/7/15 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"REHABILITATION","Score":null,"Total":0}
Identifying discriminant factors between phantom limb pain, residual limb pain, and both in people with lower limb amputations: a cross-sectional study.
Postamputation pain is a common condition in patients with lower limb amputation (LLA), which compromises amputees' rehabilitation, use of the prosthesis, and quality of life. The aim of our study was to investigate the prevalence of phantom limb pain (PLP), residual limb pain (RLP), or both types of pain among individuals with LLA, and to identify the factors associated with the presence of one type of pain versus the other. Patients who underwent amputation for traumatic or vascular reasons and who reported on RLP or PLP were analyzed and divided into three groups: PLP, RLP, or a group of subjects that presented both pains. We searched for factors that affect the occurrence of limb pain using univariate analyses, followed by multinomial logistic regression. Among the 282 participants with transtibial and transfemoral amputations, 192 participants (150 male and 42 female) presented PLP, RLP, or both types of pain, while 90 participants declared to perceive no pain. The estimated prevalence of any type of pain after transfemoral and transtibial amputation was therefore 68% (27% PLP, 10% RLP, and 31% both). Among the studied characteristics, only amputation level was associated with the type of pain ( P = 0.001). Multinomial logistic regression identified transfemoral amputation as the only statistically significant predictor for PLP (odds ratio = 2.8; P = 0.002). Hence, it was estimated that individuals with transfemoral amputation have nearly three times higher odds of experiencing PLP compared with those with transtibial amputation.
期刊介绍:
International Journal of Rehabilitation Research is a quarterly, peer-reviewed, interdisciplinary forum for the publication of research into functioning, disability and contextual factors experienced by persons of all ages in both developed and developing societies. The wealth of information offered makes the journal a valuable resource for researchers, practitioners, and administrators in such fields as rehabilitation medicine, outcome measurement nursing, social and vocational rehabilitation/case management, return to work, special education, social policy, social work and social welfare, sociology, psychology, psychiatry assistive technology and environmental factors/disability. Areas of interest include functioning and disablement throughout the life cycle; rehabilitation programmes for persons with physical, sensory, mental and developmental disabilities; measurement of functioning and disability; special education and vocational rehabilitation; equipment access and transportation; information technology; independent living; consumer, legal, economic and sociopolitical aspects of functioning, disability and contextual factors.