基于单核苷酸多态性的无创产前检测中胎儿分数测量的准确性。

IF 2.7 2区 医学 Q2 GENETICS & HEREDITY Prenatal Diagnosis Pub Date : 2024-09-01 Epub Date: 2024-07-11 DOI:10.1002/pd.6634
Peter Benn, Jingwen Zhang, Daniel Lyons, Wenbo Xu, Samantha Leonard, Zachary Demko
{"title":"基于单核苷酸多态性的无创产前检测中胎儿分数测量的准确性。","authors":"Peter Benn, Jingwen Zhang, Daniel Lyons, Wenbo Xu, Samantha Leonard, Zachary Demko","doi":"10.1002/pd.6634","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Noninvasive prenatal testing (NIPT) for fetal aneuploidy relies on the analysis of fetoplacental cell-free DNA (cfDNA) found in maternal plasma. A minimum cfDNA fetal fraction (FF) is required for reliable test performance, but some methods may have suboptimal accuracy for FF measurement. This study investigated the accuracy of a single-nucleotide polymorphism- (SNP-) based NIPT method to assess FF.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>FF measurements using SNP-based NIPT in consecutive samples from singleton male pregnancies were compared with FF measured using a \"gold standard\" Y-chromosome method.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>In a cohort of 106,846 samples, the SNP-based FF method showed a standard deviation (SD) of 0.42%. Compared to the Y chromosome FF method, a correlation coefficient, r, of 0.995, and bias of 0.17% were observed. The SD was not substantially different across specific FF ranges or for samples with high-risk NIPT results.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The SNP-based NIPT method estimates FF with good accuracy, with a SD three to eight times better than other NIPT methods (0.42% vs. 1.3%-3.4%). FF is an important quality control parameter and should be routinely reported as part of NIPT.</p>","PeriodicalId":20387,"journal":{"name":"Prenatal Diagnosis","volume":" ","pages":"1218-1224"},"PeriodicalIF":2.7000,"publicationDate":"2024-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Accuracy of fetal fraction measurements in a single-nucleotide polymorphism-based noninvasive prenatal test.\",\"authors\":\"Peter Benn, Jingwen Zhang, Daniel Lyons, Wenbo Xu, Samantha Leonard, Zachary Demko\",\"doi\":\"10.1002/pd.6634\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Noninvasive prenatal testing (NIPT) for fetal aneuploidy relies on the analysis of fetoplacental cell-free DNA (cfDNA) found in maternal plasma. A minimum cfDNA fetal fraction (FF) is required for reliable test performance, but some methods may have suboptimal accuracy for FF measurement. This study investigated the accuracy of a single-nucleotide polymorphism- (SNP-) based NIPT method to assess FF.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>FF measurements using SNP-based NIPT in consecutive samples from singleton male pregnancies were compared with FF measured using a \\\"gold standard\\\" Y-chromosome method.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>In a cohort of 106,846 samples, the SNP-based FF method showed a standard deviation (SD) of 0.42%. Compared to the Y chromosome FF method, a correlation coefficient, r, of 0.995, and bias of 0.17% were observed. The SD was not substantially different across specific FF ranges or for samples with high-risk NIPT results.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The SNP-based NIPT method estimates FF with good accuracy, with a SD three to eight times better than other NIPT methods (0.42% vs. 1.3%-3.4%). FF is an important quality control parameter and should be routinely reported as part of NIPT.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":20387,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Prenatal Diagnosis\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"1218-1224\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.7000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-09-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Prenatal Diagnosis\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1002/pd.6634\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2024/7/11 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"GENETICS & HEREDITY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Prenatal Diagnosis","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1002/pd.6634","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/7/11 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"GENETICS & HEREDITY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:胎儿非整倍体的无创产前检测(NIPT)依赖于分析母体血浆中的胎盘无细胞 DNA(cfDNA)。可靠的检测结果需要最低的 cfDNA 胎儿组分(FF),但有些方法的 FF 测量精度可能不够理想。本研究调查了基于单核苷酸多态性(SNP)的 NIPT 方法评估 FF 的准确性:方法:使用基于 SNP 的 NIPT 对单胎男性妊娠的连续样本进行 FF 测量,并与使用 "金标准 "Y 染色体方法测量的 FF 进行比较:在一组 106,846 个样本中,基于 SNP 的 FF 方法的标准偏差 (SD) 为 0.42%。与 Y 染色体 FF 方法相比,相关系数 r 为 0.995,偏差为 0.17%。SD在特定的FF范围或高风险NIPT结果样本中没有实质性差异:结论:基于 SNP 的 NIPT 方法能准确估算 FF,其 SD 值是其他 NIPT 方法的 3 到 8 倍(0.42% 对 1.3%-3.4%)。FF是一个重要的质量控制参数,应作为NIPT的一部分进行常规报告。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Accuracy of fetal fraction measurements in a single-nucleotide polymorphism-based noninvasive prenatal test.

Background: Noninvasive prenatal testing (NIPT) for fetal aneuploidy relies on the analysis of fetoplacental cell-free DNA (cfDNA) found in maternal plasma. A minimum cfDNA fetal fraction (FF) is required for reliable test performance, but some methods may have suboptimal accuracy for FF measurement. This study investigated the accuracy of a single-nucleotide polymorphism- (SNP-) based NIPT method to assess FF.

Methods: FF measurements using SNP-based NIPT in consecutive samples from singleton male pregnancies were compared with FF measured using a "gold standard" Y-chromosome method.

Results: In a cohort of 106,846 samples, the SNP-based FF method showed a standard deviation (SD) of 0.42%. Compared to the Y chromosome FF method, a correlation coefficient, r, of 0.995, and bias of 0.17% were observed. The SD was not substantially different across specific FF ranges or for samples with high-risk NIPT results.

Conclusions: The SNP-based NIPT method estimates FF with good accuracy, with a SD three to eight times better than other NIPT methods (0.42% vs. 1.3%-3.4%). FF is an important quality control parameter and should be routinely reported as part of NIPT.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Prenatal Diagnosis
Prenatal Diagnosis 医学-妇产科学
CiteScore
5.80
自引率
13.30%
发文量
204
审稿时长
2 months
期刊介绍: Prenatal Diagnosis welcomes submissions in all aspects of prenatal diagnosis with a particular focus on areas in which molecular biology and genetics interface with prenatal care and therapy, encompassing: all aspects of fetal imaging, including sonography and magnetic resonance imaging; prenatal cytogenetics, including molecular studies and array CGH; prenatal screening studies; fetal cells and cell-free nucleic acids in maternal blood and other fluids; preimplantation genetic diagnosis (PGD); prenatal diagnosis of single gene disorders, including metabolic disorders; fetal therapy; fetal and placental development and pathology; development and evaluation of laboratory services for prenatal diagnosis; psychosocial, legal, ethical and economic aspects of prenatal diagnosis; prenatal genetic counseling
期刊最新文献
Intrauterine Transfusions in Fetuses Affected by Parvovirus B19: Complications, Challenges and Outcomes. Free Fetal DNA Testing to Guide Early Intervention in the Management of the Kell Alloimmunized Pregnancy. How Are SNP-Array, Karyotyping, and FISH Applied in Prenatal Practice? A Focus on Diagnosis of Mosaicism Involving the Sex Chromosomes. Radial Expansion of Chorioamniotic Membranes After Perforation Causes Less Damage Than Fixed Diameter Instruments. Cross Sectional Study of Prenatal Diagnosis Uptake Among Individuals With Genetic Conditions.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1