以患者为中心的开放式直立磁共振成像扫描仪与传统封闭式磁共振成像扫描仪的经验对比分析。

IF 2.5 Q2 RADIOLOGY, NUCLEAR MEDICINE & MEDICAL IMAGING Radiography Pub Date : 2024-07-10 DOI:10.1016/j.radi.2024.06.021
E. Behluli , H.M. Preuer , N. Schiefermeier-Mach , R. Hornung , M. Küchler , M. Prokopetz
{"title":"以患者为中心的开放式直立磁共振成像扫描仪与传统封闭式磁共振成像扫描仪的经验对比分析。","authors":"E. Behluli ,&nbsp;H.M. Preuer ,&nbsp;N. Schiefermeier-Mach ,&nbsp;R. Hornung ,&nbsp;M. Küchler ,&nbsp;M. Prokopetz","doi":"10.1016/j.radi.2024.06.021","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Introduction</h3><p>MRI often induces anxiety, leading to incomplete scans and claustrophobia-related distress. Open MRI systems aim to enhance patient comfort. This study examines how prior MRI experiences impact subsequent encounters in an open upright MRI scanner.</p></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><p>In this cross-sectional study, 118 adult patients completed a self-administered questionnaire from August 2022 to October 2023. It covered previous MRI experiences, including questions about claustrophobia, premature scan terminations, sedative medication usage, general MRI experiences, and interactions with radiology technologists.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>Patients in open upright MRI reported less claustrophobia compared to closed MRI systems (18.4% vs. 58.3%), fewer premature scan terminations (5.3% vs. 31.0%), and less sedative use (5.3% vs. 46.9%). Moderate positive correlations were found between past and current claustrophobic events and premature scan terminations. Effective communication with radiology technologists was essential for patient comfort and reduced claustrophobia. Scan duration and noise triggered discomfort in 26.1% and 21.6% of study participants respectively. Persons without prior MRI experience were more satisfied with the examination and expressed no clear preference for future MRI settings, contrasting those with previous exposure favoring the open MRI setup.</p></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><p>The study emphasizes the benefits of open upright MRI for high-risk claustrophobic patients. It identifies the lasting impact of negative MRI experience on future examinations and highlights the crucial role of radiology technologists.</p></div><div><h3>Implications for practice</h3><p>Integrating open MRI scanners in medical facilities and prioritizing effective communication with radiology technologists enhances patient comfort. Positive experiences with open MRI may improve patient compliance and offer greater flexibility for future examinations.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":47416,"journal":{"name":"Radiography","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":2.5000,"publicationDate":"2024-07-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Patient-centric comparative analysis of experiences in open upright and conventional closed MRI scanners\",\"authors\":\"E. Behluli ,&nbsp;H.M. Preuer ,&nbsp;N. Schiefermeier-Mach ,&nbsp;R. Hornung ,&nbsp;M. Küchler ,&nbsp;M. Prokopetz\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.radi.2024.06.021\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><h3>Introduction</h3><p>MRI often induces anxiety, leading to incomplete scans and claustrophobia-related distress. Open MRI systems aim to enhance patient comfort. This study examines how prior MRI experiences impact subsequent encounters in an open upright MRI scanner.</p></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><p>In this cross-sectional study, 118 adult patients completed a self-administered questionnaire from August 2022 to October 2023. It covered previous MRI experiences, including questions about claustrophobia, premature scan terminations, sedative medication usage, general MRI experiences, and interactions with radiology technologists.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>Patients in open upright MRI reported less claustrophobia compared to closed MRI systems (18.4% vs. 58.3%), fewer premature scan terminations (5.3% vs. 31.0%), and less sedative use (5.3% vs. 46.9%). Moderate positive correlations were found between past and current claustrophobic events and premature scan terminations. Effective communication with radiology technologists was essential for patient comfort and reduced claustrophobia. Scan duration and noise triggered discomfort in 26.1% and 21.6% of study participants respectively. Persons without prior MRI experience were more satisfied with the examination and expressed no clear preference for future MRI settings, contrasting those with previous exposure favoring the open MRI setup.</p></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><p>The study emphasizes the benefits of open upright MRI for high-risk claustrophobic patients. It identifies the lasting impact of negative MRI experience on future examinations and highlights the crucial role of radiology technologists.</p></div><div><h3>Implications for practice</h3><p>Integrating open MRI scanners in medical facilities and prioritizing effective communication with radiology technologists enhances patient comfort. Positive experiences with open MRI may improve patient compliance and offer greater flexibility for future examinations.</p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":47416,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Radiography\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.5000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-07-10\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Radiography\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S107881742400172X\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"RADIOLOGY, NUCLEAR MEDICINE & MEDICAL IMAGING\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Radiography","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S107881742400172X","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"RADIOLOGY, NUCLEAR MEDICINE & MEDICAL IMAGING","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

简介核磁共振成像通常会引起焦虑,导致扫描不完整和幽闭恐惧症相关的痛苦。开放式核磁共振成像系统旨在提高患者的舒适度。本研究探讨了在开放式直立核磁共振成像扫描仪中,之前的核磁共振成像经历会对之后的就诊产生怎样的影响:在这项横断面研究中,118 名成年患者在 2022 年 8 月至 2023 年 10 月期间填写了一份自填问卷。调查内容包括以往的核磁共振成像经历,包括幽闭恐惧症、过早终止扫描、镇静药物使用、一般核磁共振成像经历以及与放射技师的互动等问题:结果:与封闭式磁共振成像系统相比,使用开放式直立磁共振成像系统的患者幽闭恐惧症较少(18.4% 对 58.3%),过早终止扫描的患者较少(5.3% 对 31.0%),使用镇静剂的患者较少(5.3% 对 46.9%)。过去和现在的幽闭恐惧症事件与过早终止扫描之间存在中度正相关。与放射技术人员的有效沟通对患者的舒适度和减少幽闭恐惧症至关重要。分别有 26.1% 和 21.6% 的研究参与者因扫描持续时间和噪音而感到不适。没有核磁共振成像经验的人对检查比较满意,对未来的核磁共振成像设置没有明确的偏好,相比之下,有经验的人更喜欢开放式核磁共振成像设置:这项研究强调了开放式直立磁共振成像对高危幽闭恐惧症患者的益处。结论:该研究强调了开放式直立磁共振成像对高危幽闭恐惧症患者的益处,并指出了磁共振成像负面体验对未来检查的持久影响,同时强调了放射技术人员的关键作用:对实践的启示:将开放式磁共振成像扫描仪整合到医疗设施中,并优先考虑与放射技术人员进行有效沟通,可提高患者的舒适度。对开放式磁共振成像的积极体验可提高患者的依从性,并为今后的检查提供更大的灵活性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Patient-centric comparative analysis of experiences in open upright and conventional closed MRI scanners

Introduction

MRI often induces anxiety, leading to incomplete scans and claustrophobia-related distress. Open MRI systems aim to enhance patient comfort. This study examines how prior MRI experiences impact subsequent encounters in an open upright MRI scanner.

Methods

In this cross-sectional study, 118 adult patients completed a self-administered questionnaire from August 2022 to October 2023. It covered previous MRI experiences, including questions about claustrophobia, premature scan terminations, sedative medication usage, general MRI experiences, and interactions with radiology technologists.

Results

Patients in open upright MRI reported less claustrophobia compared to closed MRI systems (18.4% vs. 58.3%), fewer premature scan terminations (5.3% vs. 31.0%), and less sedative use (5.3% vs. 46.9%). Moderate positive correlations were found between past and current claustrophobic events and premature scan terminations. Effective communication with radiology technologists was essential for patient comfort and reduced claustrophobia. Scan duration and noise triggered discomfort in 26.1% and 21.6% of study participants respectively. Persons without prior MRI experience were more satisfied with the examination and expressed no clear preference for future MRI settings, contrasting those with previous exposure favoring the open MRI setup.

Conclusion

The study emphasizes the benefits of open upright MRI for high-risk claustrophobic patients. It identifies the lasting impact of negative MRI experience on future examinations and highlights the crucial role of radiology technologists.

Implications for practice

Integrating open MRI scanners in medical facilities and prioritizing effective communication with radiology technologists enhances patient comfort. Positive experiences with open MRI may improve patient compliance and offer greater flexibility for future examinations.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Radiography
Radiography RADIOLOGY, NUCLEAR MEDICINE & MEDICAL IMAGING-
CiteScore
4.70
自引率
34.60%
发文量
169
审稿时长
63 days
期刊介绍: Radiography is an International, English language, peer-reviewed journal of diagnostic imaging and radiation therapy. Radiography is the official professional journal of the College of Radiographers and is published quarterly. Radiography aims to publish the highest quality material, both clinical and scientific, on all aspects of diagnostic imaging and radiation therapy and oncology.
期刊最新文献
CT metal artefact reduction for hip and shoulder implants using novel algorithms and machine learning: A systematic review with pairwise and network meta-analyses Clinical insights into cross-sectional imaging integration in radiography education Paediatric diagnostic reference levels for common computed tomography procedures: A systematic review “Making it work in the face of extreme adversity” - Exploring perceptions for the future of the imaging and oncology workforce using ‘soundbite’ interviews Radiographer Education and Learning in Artificial Intelligence (REAL-AI): A survey of radiographers, radiologists, and students’ knowledge of and attitude to education on AI
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1