E. Behluli , H.M. Preuer , N. Schiefermeier-Mach , R. Hornung , M. Küchler , M. Prokopetz
{"title":"以患者为中心的开放式直立磁共振成像扫描仪与传统封闭式磁共振成像扫描仪的经验对比分析。","authors":"E. Behluli , H.M. Preuer , N. Schiefermeier-Mach , R. Hornung , M. Küchler , M. Prokopetz","doi":"10.1016/j.radi.2024.06.021","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Introduction</h3><p>MRI often induces anxiety, leading to incomplete scans and claustrophobia-related distress. Open MRI systems aim to enhance patient comfort. This study examines how prior MRI experiences impact subsequent encounters in an open upright MRI scanner.</p></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><p>In this cross-sectional study, 118 adult patients completed a self-administered questionnaire from August 2022 to October 2023. It covered previous MRI experiences, including questions about claustrophobia, premature scan terminations, sedative medication usage, general MRI experiences, and interactions with radiology technologists.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>Patients in open upright MRI reported less claustrophobia compared to closed MRI systems (18.4% vs. 58.3%), fewer premature scan terminations (5.3% vs. 31.0%), and less sedative use (5.3% vs. 46.9%). Moderate positive correlations were found between past and current claustrophobic events and premature scan terminations. Effective communication with radiology technologists was essential for patient comfort and reduced claustrophobia. Scan duration and noise triggered discomfort in 26.1% and 21.6% of study participants respectively. Persons without prior MRI experience were more satisfied with the examination and expressed no clear preference for future MRI settings, contrasting those with previous exposure favoring the open MRI setup.</p></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><p>The study emphasizes the benefits of open upright MRI for high-risk claustrophobic patients. It identifies the lasting impact of negative MRI experience on future examinations and highlights the crucial role of radiology technologists.</p></div><div><h3>Implications for practice</h3><p>Integrating open MRI scanners in medical facilities and prioritizing effective communication with radiology technologists enhances patient comfort. Positive experiences with open MRI may improve patient compliance and offer greater flexibility for future examinations.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":47416,"journal":{"name":"Radiography","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":2.5000,"publicationDate":"2024-07-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Patient-centric comparative analysis of experiences in open upright and conventional closed MRI scanners\",\"authors\":\"E. Behluli , H.M. Preuer , N. Schiefermeier-Mach , R. Hornung , M. Küchler , M. Prokopetz\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.radi.2024.06.021\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><h3>Introduction</h3><p>MRI often induces anxiety, leading to incomplete scans and claustrophobia-related distress. Open MRI systems aim to enhance patient comfort. This study examines how prior MRI experiences impact subsequent encounters in an open upright MRI scanner.</p></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><p>In this cross-sectional study, 118 adult patients completed a self-administered questionnaire from August 2022 to October 2023. It covered previous MRI experiences, including questions about claustrophobia, premature scan terminations, sedative medication usage, general MRI experiences, and interactions with radiology technologists.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>Patients in open upright MRI reported less claustrophobia compared to closed MRI systems (18.4% vs. 58.3%), fewer premature scan terminations (5.3% vs. 31.0%), and less sedative use (5.3% vs. 46.9%). Moderate positive correlations were found between past and current claustrophobic events and premature scan terminations. Effective communication with radiology technologists was essential for patient comfort and reduced claustrophobia. Scan duration and noise triggered discomfort in 26.1% and 21.6% of study participants respectively. Persons without prior MRI experience were more satisfied with the examination and expressed no clear preference for future MRI settings, contrasting those with previous exposure favoring the open MRI setup.</p></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><p>The study emphasizes the benefits of open upright MRI for high-risk claustrophobic patients. It identifies the lasting impact of negative MRI experience on future examinations and highlights the crucial role of radiology technologists.</p></div><div><h3>Implications for practice</h3><p>Integrating open MRI scanners in medical facilities and prioritizing effective communication with radiology technologists enhances patient comfort. Positive experiences with open MRI may improve patient compliance and offer greater flexibility for future examinations.</p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":47416,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Radiography\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.5000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-07-10\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Radiography\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S107881742400172X\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"RADIOLOGY, NUCLEAR MEDICINE & MEDICAL IMAGING\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Radiography","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S107881742400172X","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"RADIOLOGY, NUCLEAR MEDICINE & MEDICAL IMAGING","Score":null,"Total":0}
Patient-centric comparative analysis of experiences in open upright and conventional closed MRI scanners
Introduction
MRI often induces anxiety, leading to incomplete scans and claustrophobia-related distress. Open MRI systems aim to enhance patient comfort. This study examines how prior MRI experiences impact subsequent encounters in an open upright MRI scanner.
Methods
In this cross-sectional study, 118 adult patients completed a self-administered questionnaire from August 2022 to October 2023. It covered previous MRI experiences, including questions about claustrophobia, premature scan terminations, sedative medication usage, general MRI experiences, and interactions with radiology technologists.
Results
Patients in open upright MRI reported less claustrophobia compared to closed MRI systems (18.4% vs. 58.3%), fewer premature scan terminations (5.3% vs. 31.0%), and less sedative use (5.3% vs. 46.9%). Moderate positive correlations were found between past and current claustrophobic events and premature scan terminations. Effective communication with radiology technologists was essential for patient comfort and reduced claustrophobia. Scan duration and noise triggered discomfort in 26.1% and 21.6% of study participants respectively. Persons without prior MRI experience were more satisfied with the examination and expressed no clear preference for future MRI settings, contrasting those with previous exposure favoring the open MRI setup.
Conclusion
The study emphasizes the benefits of open upright MRI for high-risk claustrophobic patients. It identifies the lasting impact of negative MRI experience on future examinations and highlights the crucial role of radiology technologists.
Implications for practice
Integrating open MRI scanners in medical facilities and prioritizing effective communication with radiology technologists enhances patient comfort. Positive experiences with open MRI may improve patient compliance and offer greater flexibility for future examinations.
RadiographyRADIOLOGY, NUCLEAR MEDICINE & MEDICAL IMAGING-
CiteScore
4.70
自引率
34.60%
发文量
169
审稿时长
63 days
期刊介绍:
Radiography is an International, English language, peer-reviewed journal of diagnostic imaging and radiation therapy. Radiography is the official professional journal of the College of Radiographers and is published quarterly. Radiography aims to publish the highest quality material, both clinical and scientific, on all aspects of diagnostic imaging and radiation therapy and oncology.