对全球四足动物特征的系统发育信息描述解决了数据缺口和偏差问题。

IF 9.8 1区 生物学 Q1 Agricultural and Biological Sciences PLoS Biology Pub Date : 2024-07-11 eCollection Date: 2024-07-01 DOI:10.1371/journal.pbio.3002658
Mario R Moura, Karoline Ceron, Jhonny J M Guedes, Rosana Chen-Zhao, Yanina V Sica, Julie Hart, Wendy Dorman, Julia M Portmann, Pamela González-Del-Pliego, Ajay Ranipeta, Alessandro Catenazzi, Fernanda P Werneck, Luís Felipe Toledo, Nathan S Upham, João F R Tonini, Timothy J Colston, Robert Guralnick, Rauri C K Bowie, R Alexander Pyron, Walter Jetz
{"title":"对全球四足动物特征的系统发育信息描述解决了数据缺口和偏差问题。","authors":"Mario R Moura, Karoline Ceron, Jhonny J M Guedes, Rosana Chen-Zhao, Yanina V Sica, Julie Hart, Wendy Dorman, Julia M Portmann, Pamela González-Del-Pliego, Ajay Ranipeta, Alessandro Catenazzi, Fernanda P Werneck, Luís Felipe Toledo, Nathan S Upham, João F R Tonini, Timothy J Colston, Robert Guralnick, Rauri C K Bowie, R Alexander Pyron, Walter Jetz","doi":"10.1371/journal.pbio.3002658","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Tetrapods (amphibians, reptiles, birds, and mammals) are model systems for global biodiversity science, but continuing data gaps, limited data standardisation, and ongoing flux in taxonomic nomenclature constrain integrative research on this group and potentially cause biased inference. We combined and harmonised taxonomic, spatial, phylogenetic, and attribute data with phylogeny-based multiple imputation to provide a comprehensive data resource (TetrapodTraits 1.0.0) that includes values, predictions, and sources for body size, activity time, micro- and macrohabitat, ecosystem, threat status, biogeography, insularity, environmental preferences, and human influence, for all 33,281 tetrapod species covered in recent fully sampled phylogenies. We assess gaps and biases across taxa and space, finding that shared data missing in attribute values increased with taxon-level completeness and richness across clades. Prediction of missing attribute values using multiple imputation revealed substantial changes in estimated macroecological patterns. These results highlight biases incurred by nonrandom missingness and strategies to best address them. While there is an obvious need for further data collection and updates, our phylogeny-informed database of tetrapod traits can support a more comprehensive representation of tetrapod species and their attributes in ecology, evolution, and conservation research.</p>","PeriodicalId":49001,"journal":{"name":"PLoS Biology","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":9.8000,"publicationDate":"2024-07-11","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11239118/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"A phylogeny-informed characterisation of global tetrapod traits addresses data gaps and biases.\",\"authors\":\"Mario R Moura, Karoline Ceron, Jhonny J M Guedes, Rosana Chen-Zhao, Yanina V Sica, Julie Hart, Wendy Dorman, Julia M Portmann, Pamela González-Del-Pliego, Ajay Ranipeta, Alessandro Catenazzi, Fernanda P Werneck, Luís Felipe Toledo, Nathan S Upham, João F R Tonini, Timothy J Colston, Robert Guralnick, Rauri C K Bowie, R Alexander Pyron, Walter Jetz\",\"doi\":\"10.1371/journal.pbio.3002658\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>Tetrapods (amphibians, reptiles, birds, and mammals) are model systems for global biodiversity science, but continuing data gaps, limited data standardisation, and ongoing flux in taxonomic nomenclature constrain integrative research on this group and potentially cause biased inference. We combined and harmonised taxonomic, spatial, phylogenetic, and attribute data with phylogeny-based multiple imputation to provide a comprehensive data resource (TetrapodTraits 1.0.0) that includes values, predictions, and sources for body size, activity time, micro- and macrohabitat, ecosystem, threat status, biogeography, insularity, environmental preferences, and human influence, for all 33,281 tetrapod species covered in recent fully sampled phylogenies. We assess gaps and biases across taxa and space, finding that shared data missing in attribute values increased with taxon-level completeness and richness across clades. Prediction of missing attribute values using multiple imputation revealed substantial changes in estimated macroecological patterns. These results highlight biases incurred by nonrandom missingness and strategies to best address them. While there is an obvious need for further data collection and updates, our phylogeny-informed database of tetrapod traits can support a more comprehensive representation of tetrapod species and their attributes in ecology, evolution, and conservation research.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":49001,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"PLoS Biology\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":9.8000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-07-11\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11239118/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"PLoS Biology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"99\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pbio.3002658\",\"RegionNum\":1,\"RegionCategory\":\"生物学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2024/7/1 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"eCollection\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"Agricultural and Biological Sciences\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"PLoS Biology","FirstCategoryId":"99","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pbio.3002658","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"生物学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/7/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"Agricultural and Biological Sciences","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

四足动物(两栖类、爬行类、鸟类和哺乳类)是全球生物多样性科学的模型系统,但持续的数据缺口、有限的数据标准化以及分类命名法的不断变化限制了对这一群体的综合研究,并可能导致推论出现偏差。我们将分类学、空间、系统发育和属性数据与基于系统发育的多重估算结合起来并加以协调,从而提供了一个全面的数据资源(TetrapodTraits 1.0.0),其中包括体型、活动时间、微观和宏观栖息地、生态系统、威胁状况、生物地理学、孤岛性、环境偏好和人类影响等方面的数值、预测和来源,适用于最近完全采样系统发育所涵盖的所有 33281 个四足动物物种。我们评估了跨类群和跨空间的差距和偏差,发现属性值缺失的共享数据随着类群级别的完整性和各支系的丰富性而增加。使用多重估算对缺失的属性值进行预测,发现估计的宏观生态模式发生了重大变化。这些结果突显了非随机缺失造成的偏差以及解决这些偏差的最佳策略。虽然显然需要进一步的数据收集和更新,但我们的系统发育信息四足动物特征数据库可以支持在生态学、进化和保护研究中更全面地反映四足动物物种及其属性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
A phylogeny-informed characterisation of global tetrapod traits addresses data gaps and biases.

Tetrapods (amphibians, reptiles, birds, and mammals) are model systems for global biodiversity science, but continuing data gaps, limited data standardisation, and ongoing flux in taxonomic nomenclature constrain integrative research on this group and potentially cause biased inference. We combined and harmonised taxonomic, spatial, phylogenetic, and attribute data with phylogeny-based multiple imputation to provide a comprehensive data resource (TetrapodTraits 1.0.0) that includes values, predictions, and sources for body size, activity time, micro- and macrohabitat, ecosystem, threat status, biogeography, insularity, environmental preferences, and human influence, for all 33,281 tetrapod species covered in recent fully sampled phylogenies. We assess gaps and biases across taxa and space, finding that shared data missing in attribute values increased with taxon-level completeness and richness across clades. Prediction of missing attribute values using multiple imputation revealed substantial changes in estimated macroecological patterns. These results highlight biases incurred by nonrandom missingness and strategies to best address them. While there is an obvious need for further data collection and updates, our phylogeny-informed database of tetrapod traits can support a more comprehensive representation of tetrapod species and their attributes in ecology, evolution, and conservation research.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
PLoS Biology
PLoS Biology BIOCHEMISTRY & MOLECULAR BIOLOGY-BIOLOGY
CiteScore
15.40
自引率
2.00%
发文量
359
审稿时长
3-8 weeks
期刊介绍: PLOS Biology is the flagship journal of the Public Library of Science (PLOS) and focuses on publishing groundbreaking and relevant research in all areas of biological science. The journal features works at various scales, ranging from molecules to ecosystems, and also encourages interdisciplinary studies. PLOS Biology publishes articles that demonstrate exceptional significance, originality, and relevance, with a high standard of scientific rigor in methodology, reporting, and conclusions. The journal aims to advance science and serve the research community by transforming research communication to align with the research process. It offers evolving article types and policies that empower authors to share the complete story behind their scientific findings with a diverse global audience of researchers, educators, policymakers, patient advocacy groups, and the general public. PLOS Biology, along with other PLOS journals, is widely indexed by major services such as Crossref, Dimensions, DOAJ, Google Scholar, PubMed, PubMed Central, Scopus, and Web of Science. Additionally, PLOS Biology is indexed by various other services including AGRICOLA, Biological Abstracts, BIOSYS Previews, CABI CAB Abstracts, CABI Global Health, CAPES, CAS, CNKI, Embase, Journal Guide, MEDLINE, and Zoological Record, ensuring that the research content is easily accessible and discoverable by a wide range of audiences.
期刊最新文献
LXR-dependent enhancer activation regulates the temporal organization of the liver's response to refeeding leading to lipogenic gene overshoot. Syllable processing is organized in discrete subregions of the human superior temporal gyrus. Centrosome amplification primes ovarian cancer cells for apoptosis and potentiates the response to chemotherapy. Keeping time: How musical training may boost cognition. A flexible loop in the paxillin LIM3 domain mediates its direct binding to integrin β subunits.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1