约束全息暗能量并分析宇宙学张力

IF 5 2区 物理与天体物理 Q1 ASTRONOMY & ASTROPHYSICS Physics of the Dark Universe Pub Date : 2024-07-04 DOI:10.1016/j.dark.2024.101568
Xin Tang , Yin-Zhe Ma , Wei-Ming Dai , Hong-Jian He
{"title":"约束全息暗能量并分析宇宙学张力","authors":"Xin Tang ,&nbsp;Yin-Zhe Ma ,&nbsp;Wei-Ming Dai ,&nbsp;Hong-Jian He","doi":"10.1016/j.dark.2024.101568","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>We investigate cosmological constraints on the holographic dark energy (HDE) using the state-of-the-art cosmological datasets: <em>Planck</em> CMB angular power spectra and weak lensing power spectra, Atacama Cosmology Telescope (ACT) temperature power spectra, baryon acoustic oscillation (BAO) and redshift-space distortion (RSD) measurements from six-degree-field galaxy survey and Sloan Digital Sky Survey (DR12 &amp; DR16) and the Cepheids-Supernovae measurement from SH0ES team (R22). We also examine the HDE model and <span><math><mi>Λ</mi></math></span>CDM with and without <span><math><msub><mrow><mi>N</mi></mrow><mrow><mi>eff</mi></mrow></msub></math></span> (effective number of relativistic species) being treated as a free parameter. We find that the HDE model can relieve the tensions of <span><math><msub><mrow><mi>H</mi></mrow><mrow><mn>0</mn></mrow></msub></math></span> and <span><math><msub><mrow><mi>S</mi></mrow><mrow><mn>8</mn></mrow></msub></math></span> to certain degrees. With “<em>Planck</em>+ACT+BAO+RSD” datasets, the constraints are <span><math><mrow><msub><mrow><mi>H</mi></mrow><mrow><mn>0</mn></mrow></msub><mspace></mspace><mo>=</mo><mspace></mspace><mn>69</mn><mo>.</mo><mn>70</mn><mo>±</mo><mn>1</mn><mo>.</mo><mn>39</mn><mspace></mspace><msup><mrow><mtext>km s</mtext></mrow><mrow><mo>−</mo><mn>1</mn></mrow></msup><msup><mrow><mi>Mpc</mi></mrow><mrow><mo>−</mo><mn>1</mn></mrow></msup></mrow></math></span> and <span><math><mrow><msub><mrow><mi>S</mi></mrow><mrow><mn>8</mn></mrow></msub><mspace></mspace><mo>=</mo><mspace></mspace><mn>0</mn><mo>.</mo><mn>823</mn><mo>±</mo><mn>0</mn><mo>.</mo><mn>011</mn></mrow></math></span> in HDE model, which brings down the Hubble tension down to <span><math><mrow><mn>1</mn><mo>.</mo><mn>92</mn><mi>σ</mi></mrow></math></span> confidence level (C.L.) and the <span><math><msub><mrow><mi>S</mi></mrow><mrow><mn>8</mn></mrow></msub></math></span> tension to <span><math><mrow><mrow><mo>(</mo><mn>1</mn><mspace></mspace><mo>−</mo><mspace></mspace><mn>2</mn><mo>)</mo></mrow><mi>σ</mi></mrow></math></span> C.L. By adding the R22 data, their values are improved as <span><math><mrow><msub><mrow><mi>H</mi></mrow><mrow><mn>0</mn></mrow></msub><mo>=</mo><mn>71</mn><mo>.</mo><mn>86</mn><mo>±</mo><mn>0</mn><mo>.</mo><mn>93</mn><mspace></mspace><msup><mrow><mtext>km s</mtext></mrow><mrow><mo>−</mo><mn>1</mn></mrow></msup><msup><mrow><mi>Mpc</mi></mrow><mrow><mo>−</mo><mn>1</mn></mrow></msup></mrow></math></span> and <span><math><mrow><msub><mrow><mi>S</mi></mrow><mrow><mn>8</mn></mrow></msub><mo>=</mo><mn>0</mn><mo>.</mo><mn>813</mn><mo>±</mo><mn>0</mn><mo>.</mo><mn>010</mn></mrow></math></span>, which further brings the Hubble tension down to <span><math><mrow><mn>0</mn><mo>.</mo><mn>85</mn><mi>σ</mi></mrow></math></span> C.L. and relieves the <span><math><msub><mrow><mi>S</mi></mrow><mrow><mn>8</mn></mrow></msub></math></span> tension. We also quantify the goodness-of-fit of different models with Akaike information criterion (AIC) and Bayesian information criterion (BIC), and find that the HDE agrees with the observational data better than the <span><math><mi>Λ</mi></math></span>CDM and other extended models (treating <span><math><msub><mrow><mi>N</mi></mrow><mrow><mi>eff</mi></mrow></msub></math></span> as free for fitting).</p></div>","PeriodicalId":48774,"journal":{"name":"Physics of the Dark Universe","volume":"46 ","pages":"Article 101568"},"PeriodicalIF":5.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-07-04","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S221268642400150X/pdfft?md5=6a17ca587fc8ec00e5b82905b215a69b&pid=1-s2.0-S221268642400150X-main.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Constraining holographic dark energy and analyzing cosmological tensions\",\"authors\":\"Xin Tang ,&nbsp;Yin-Zhe Ma ,&nbsp;Wei-Ming Dai ,&nbsp;Hong-Jian He\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.dark.2024.101568\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><p>We investigate cosmological constraints on the holographic dark energy (HDE) using the state-of-the-art cosmological datasets: <em>Planck</em> CMB angular power spectra and weak lensing power spectra, Atacama Cosmology Telescope (ACT) temperature power spectra, baryon acoustic oscillation (BAO) and redshift-space distortion (RSD) measurements from six-degree-field galaxy survey and Sloan Digital Sky Survey (DR12 &amp; DR16) and the Cepheids-Supernovae measurement from SH0ES team (R22). We also examine the HDE model and <span><math><mi>Λ</mi></math></span>CDM with and without <span><math><msub><mrow><mi>N</mi></mrow><mrow><mi>eff</mi></mrow></msub></math></span> (effective number of relativistic species) being treated as a free parameter. We find that the HDE model can relieve the tensions of <span><math><msub><mrow><mi>H</mi></mrow><mrow><mn>0</mn></mrow></msub></math></span> and <span><math><msub><mrow><mi>S</mi></mrow><mrow><mn>8</mn></mrow></msub></math></span> to certain degrees. With “<em>Planck</em>+ACT+BAO+RSD” datasets, the constraints are <span><math><mrow><msub><mrow><mi>H</mi></mrow><mrow><mn>0</mn></mrow></msub><mspace></mspace><mo>=</mo><mspace></mspace><mn>69</mn><mo>.</mo><mn>70</mn><mo>±</mo><mn>1</mn><mo>.</mo><mn>39</mn><mspace></mspace><msup><mrow><mtext>km s</mtext></mrow><mrow><mo>−</mo><mn>1</mn></mrow></msup><msup><mrow><mi>Mpc</mi></mrow><mrow><mo>−</mo><mn>1</mn></mrow></msup></mrow></math></span> and <span><math><mrow><msub><mrow><mi>S</mi></mrow><mrow><mn>8</mn></mrow></msub><mspace></mspace><mo>=</mo><mspace></mspace><mn>0</mn><mo>.</mo><mn>823</mn><mo>±</mo><mn>0</mn><mo>.</mo><mn>011</mn></mrow></math></span> in HDE model, which brings down the Hubble tension down to <span><math><mrow><mn>1</mn><mo>.</mo><mn>92</mn><mi>σ</mi></mrow></math></span> confidence level (C.L.) and the <span><math><msub><mrow><mi>S</mi></mrow><mrow><mn>8</mn></mrow></msub></math></span> tension to <span><math><mrow><mrow><mo>(</mo><mn>1</mn><mspace></mspace><mo>−</mo><mspace></mspace><mn>2</mn><mo>)</mo></mrow><mi>σ</mi></mrow></math></span> C.L. By adding the R22 data, their values are improved as <span><math><mrow><msub><mrow><mi>H</mi></mrow><mrow><mn>0</mn></mrow></msub><mo>=</mo><mn>71</mn><mo>.</mo><mn>86</mn><mo>±</mo><mn>0</mn><mo>.</mo><mn>93</mn><mspace></mspace><msup><mrow><mtext>km s</mtext></mrow><mrow><mo>−</mo><mn>1</mn></mrow></msup><msup><mrow><mi>Mpc</mi></mrow><mrow><mo>−</mo><mn>1</mn></mrow></msup></mrow></math></span> and <span><math><mrow><msub><mrow><mi>S</mi></mrow><mrow><mn>8</mn></mrow></msub><mo>=</mo><mn>0</mn><mo>.</mo><mn>813</mn><mo>±</mo><mn>0</mn><mo>.</mo><mn>010</mn></mrow></math></span>, which further brings the Hubble tension down to <span><math><mrow><mn>0</mn><mo>.</mo><mn>85</mn><mi>σ</mi></mrow></math></span> C.L. and relieves the <span><math><msub><mrow><mi>S</mi></mrow><mrow><mn>8</mn></mrow></msub></math></span> tension. We also quantify the goodness-of-fit of different models with Akaike information criterion (AIC) and Bayesian information criterion (BIC), and find that the HDE agrees with the observational data better than the <span><math><mi>Λ</mi></math></span>CDM and other extended models (treating <span><math><msub><mrow><mi>N</mi></mrow><mrow><mi>eff</mi></mrow></msub></math></span> as free for fitting).</p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":48774,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Physics of the Dark Universe\",\"volume\":\"46 \",\"pages\":\"Article 101568\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":5.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-07-04\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S221268642400150X/pdfft?md5=6a17ca587fc8ec00e5b82905b215a69b&pid=1-s2.0-S221268642400150X-main.pdf\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Physics of the Dark Universe\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"101\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S221268642400150X\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"物理与天体物理\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"ASTRONOMY & ASTROPHYSICS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Physics of the Dark Universe","FirstCategoryId":"101","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S221268642400150X","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"物理与天体物理","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ASTRONOMY & ASTROPHYSICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

我们利用最先进的宇宙学数据集研究了全息暗能量(HDE)的宇宙学约束:普朗克 CMB 角功率谱和弱透镜功率谱、阿塔卡马宇宙学望远镜(ACT)温度功率谱、六度视场星系巡天和斯隆数字巡天(DR12 & DR16)的重子声振荡(BAO)和红移空间扭曲(RSD)测量,以及 SH0ES 小组(R22)的仙女座-超新星测量。我们还研究了HDE模型和ΛCDM,包括将Neff(相对论物种的有效数量)作为自由参数处理和不作为自由参数处理的情况。我们发现,HDE模型可以在一定程度上缓解H0和S8的紧张关系。在 "Planck+ACT+BAO+RSD "数据集下,HDE模型的约束条件为H0=69.70±1.39km s-1Mpc-1和S8=0.823±0.011,这使得哈勃张力下降到1.92σ置信水平(C.L.加入 R22 数据后,它们的值提高为 H0=71.86±0.93km s-1Mpc-1,S8=0.813±0.010,使哈勃张力进一步下降到 0.85σ C.L.,并缓解了 S8 张力。我们还用阿凯克信息准则(AIC)和贝叶斯信息准则(BIC)量化了不同模型的拟合优度,发现HDE比ΛCDM和其他扩展模型(将Neff视为自由拟合)更符合观测数据。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Constraining holographic dark energy and analyzing cosmological tensions

We investigate cosmological constraints on the holographic dark energy (HDE) using the state-of-the-art cosmological datasets: Planck CMB angular power spectra and weak lensing power spectra, Atacama Cosmology Telescope (ACT) temperature power spectra, baryon acoustic oscillation (BAO) and redshift-space distortion (RSD) measurements from six-degree-field galaxy survey and Sloan Digital Sky Survey (DR12 & DR16) and the Cepheids-Supernovae measurement from SH0ES team (R22). We also examine the HDE model and ΛCDM with and without Neff (effective number of relativistic species) being treated as a free parameter. We find that the HDE model can relieve the tensions of H0 and S8 to certain degrees. With “Planck+ACT+BAO+RSD” datasets, the constraints are H0=69.70±1.39km s1Mpc1 and S8=0.823±0.011 in HDE model, which brings down the Hubble tension down to 1.92σ confidence level (C.L.) and the S8 tension to (12)σ C.L. By adding the R22 data, their values are improved as H0=71.86±0.93km s1Mpc1 and S8=0.813±0.010, which further brings the Hubble tension down to 0.85σ C.L. and relieves the S8 tension. We also quantify the goodness-of-fit of different models with Akaike information criterion (AIC) and Bayesian information criterion (BIC), and find that the HDE agrees with the observational data better than the ΛCDM and other extended models (treating Neff as free for fitting).

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Physics of the Dark Universe
Physics of the Dark Universe ASTRONOMY & ASTROPHYSICS-
CiteScore
9.60
自引率
7.30%
发文量
118
审稿时长
61 days
期刊介绍: Physics of the Dark Universe is an innovative online-only journal that offers rapid publication of peer-reviewed, original research articles considered of high scientific impact. The journal is focused on the understanding of Dark Matter, Dark Energy, Early Universe, gravitational waves and neutrinos, covering all theoretical, experimental and phenomenological aspects.
期刊最新文献
Gravitational waves dynamics with Higgs portal and U(1) x SU(2) interactions Gravastar models in braneworld scenario: The influence of Durgapal-V metric potential A new generic class of charged stellar structure in extended teleparallel gravity Testing of rotating Einstein-Yang–Mills-Higgs black hole through QPOs Probing gravitational baryogenesis phenomenon in specific modified gravity
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1