采用回归-内容分析法评估公众对针对 COVID-19 大流行的共享流动措施的满意度

IF 3.2 3区 工程技术 Q2 PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH Journal of Transport & Health Pub Date : 2024-07-11 DOI:10.1016/j.jth.2024.101873
Boniphace Kutela , Nikhil Menon , Jacob Herman , Cuthbert Ruseruka , Subasish Das
{"title":"采用回归-内容分析法评估公众对针对 COVID-19 大流行的共享流动措施的满意度","authors":"Boniphace Kutela ,&nbsp;Nikhil Menon ,&nbsp;Jacob Herman ,&nbsp;Cuthbert Ruseruka ,&nbsp;Subasish Das","doi":"10.1016/j.jth.2024.101873","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Introduction</h3><p>The transportation sector was severely impacted by the COVID-19 pandemic, with shared mobility services being the most affected due to concerns from the public regarding the high likelihood of being a vector of the virus. Although studies have evaluated the impact of the COVID-19 pandemic on shared mobility, a deeper understanding of public satisfaction with the measures adopted during COVID-19 has not been explored.</p></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><p>This study utilized data collected in the Summer of 2020 across the United States to fill that literature gap. The study applied Ordered Probit (OP) models to explore the factors influencing an individual's confidence in not contracting COVID-19 while using shared mobility modes and Text Network Analysis (TNA) to understand the deeper reasons for their confidence levels.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>Results show a significant influence of sociodemographic factors, land-use/built environment, pre- and post-COVID travel behavior, and activity participation on respondents’ level of confidence for not contracting COVID-19. Only frequent public transit users showed that they have high confidence in not getting COVID-19 when they use any of the shared mobility options, while people who did not use public transit and those who frequently attend telehealth meetings had low confidence in the measures adopted by shared mobility providers. Furthermore, the text mining results indicated that cleanness was the key theme regardless of the confidence level of the respondents, except for rail and bus transit. However, we observed other patterns of themes across the types of shared mobility.</p></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><p>The study findings can be beneficial in the future to improve ridership during pandemics by considering perceptions and satisfactions of various users.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":47838,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Transport & Health","volume":"38 ","pages":"Article 101873"},"PeriodicalIF":3.2000,"publicationDate":"2024-07-11","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"A regression-content analysis approach to assess public satisfaction with shared mobility measures against COVID-19 pandemic\",\"authors\":\"Boniphace Kutela ,&nbsp;Nikhil Menon ,&nbsp;Jacob Herman ,&nbsp;Cuthbert Ruseruka ,&nbsp;Subasish Das\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.jth.2024.101873\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><h3>Introduction</h3><p>The transportation sector was severely impacted by the COVID-19 pandemic, with shared mobility services being the most affected due to concerns from the public regarding the high likelihood of being a vector of the virus. Although studies have evaluated the impact of the COVID-19 pandemic on shared mobility, a deeper understanding of public satisfaction with the measures adopted during COVID-19 has not been explored.</p></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><p>This study utilized data collected in the Summer of 2020 across the United States to fill that literature gap. The study applied Ordered Probit (OP) models to explore the factors influencing an individual's confidence in not contracting COVID-19 while using shared mobility modes and Text Network Analysis (TNA) to understand the deeper reasons for their confidence levels.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>Results show a significant influence of sociodemographic factors, land-use/built environment, pre- and post-COVID travel behavior, and activity participation on respondents’ level of confidence for not contracting COVID-19. Only frequent public transit users showed that they have high confidence in not getting COVID-19 when they use any of the shared mobility options, while people who did not use public transit and those who frequently attend telehealth meetings had low confidence in the measures adopted by shared mobility providers. Furthermore, the text mining results indicated that cleanness was the key theme regardless of the confidence level of the respondents, except for rail and bus transit. However, we observed other patterns of themes across the types of shared mobility.</p></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><p>The study findings can be beneficial in the future to improve ridership during pandemics by considering perceptions and satisfactions of various users.</p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":47838,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Transport & Health\",\"volume\":\"38 \",\"pages\":\"Article 101873\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.2000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-07-11\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Transport & Health\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2214140524001191\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"工程技术\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Transport & Health","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2214140524001191","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"工程技术","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

导言交通部门受到 COVID-19 大流行的严重影响,其中共享交通服务受到的影响最大,因为公众担心共享交通服务极有可能成为病毒的传播媒介。虽然已有研究评估了 COVID-19 大流行对共享交通的影响,但尚未深入了解公众对 COVID-19 期间所采取措施的满意度。研究采用了有序推理(OP)模型来探索影响个人对不签署 COVID-19 的信心的因素,同时使用共享移动模式和文本网络分析(TNA)来了解其信心水平的深层原因。结果结果显示,社会人口因素、土地使用/建筑环境、COVID 前后的出行行为以及活动参与度对受访者对不签署 COVID-19 的信心水平有显著影响。只有经常乘坐公共交通的受访者表示在使用任何一种共享出行方式时对不会感染 COVID-19 有较高的信心,而不乘坐公共交通的受访者和经常参加远程医疗会议的受访者则对共享出行服务提供商采取的措施信心不足。此外,文本挖掘结果表明,除轨道交通和公共汽车外,无论受访者的信心水平如何,清洁都是关键主题。然而,我们也观察到了不同类型共享交通的其他主题模式。结论这项研究的结果有助于未来通过考虑不同用户的看法和满意度来提高大流行病期间的乘车率。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
A regression-content analysis approach to assess public satisfaction with shared mobility measures against COVID-19 pandemic

Introduction

The transportation sector was severely impacted by the COVID-19 pandemic, with shared mobility services being the most affected due to concerns from the public regarding the high likelihood of being a vector of the virus. Although studies have evaluated the impact of the COVID-19 pandemic on shared mobility, a deeper understanding of public satisfaction with the measures adopted during COVID-19 has not been explored.

Methods

This study utilized data collected in the Summer of 2020 across the United States to fill that literature gap. The study applied Ordered Probit (OP) models to explore the factors influencing an individual's confidence in not contracting COVID-19 while using shared mobility modes and Text Network Analysis (TNA) to understand the deeper reasons for their confidence levels.

Results

Results show a significant influence of sociodemographic factors, land-use/built environment, pre- and post-COVID travel behavior, and activity participation on respondents’ level of confidence for not contracting COVID-19. Only frequent public transit users showed that they have high confidence in not getting COVID-19 when they use any of the shared mobility options, while people who did not use public transit and those who frequently attend telehealth meetings had low confidence in the measures adopted by shared mobility providers. Furthermore, the text mining results indicated that cleanness was the key theme regardless of the confidence level of the respondents, except for rail and bus transit. However, we observed other patterns of themes across the types of shared mobility.

Conclusions

The study findings can be beneficial in the future to improve ridership during pandemics by considering perceptions and satisfactions of various users.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
6.10
自引率
11.10%
发文量
196
审稿时长
69 days
期刊最新文献
Association between the risk of aberrant driving behavior and sleep disorder indices: A pilot study involving urban taxi drivers Driver vehicle crashes and mental health challenges among commuter college students The biosocial health of U.S. long haul truckers: Syndemics of the road Examining healthcare access with physical vs. telehealth options: Promise and peril for socially vulnerable older adults Physical activity and muscle activity of riding electric scooters
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1