前瞻性评估人工智能增强型心电图算法的新方法。

IF 1.3 4区 医学 Q3 CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS Journal of electrocardiology Pub Date : 2024-09-01 DOI:10.1016/j.jelectrocard.2024.06.046
{"title":"前瞻性评估人工智能增强型心电图算法的新方法。","authors":"","doi":"10.1016/j.jelectrocard.2024.06.046","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p><span><span>Significant strides will be made in the field of computerized electrocardiology through the development of artificial intelligence (AI)-enhanced ECG (AI-ECG) algorithms. Yet, the scientific discourse has primarily relied upon on retrospective analyses for deriving and externally validating AI-ECG classification algorithms, an approach that fails to fully judge their real-world effectiveness or reveal potential unintended consequences. Prospective trials and analyses of AI-ECG algorithms will be crucial for assessing real-world diagnostic scenarios and understanding their practical utility and degree influence they confer onto clinicians. However, conducting such studies is challenging due to their resource-intensive nature and associated technical and logistical hurdles. To overcome these challenges, we propose an innovative approach to assess AI-ECG algorithms using a virtual testing environment. This strategy can yield critical insights into the practical utility and clinical implications of novel AI-ECG algorithms. Moreover, such an approach can enable an assessment of the influence of AI-ECG algorithms have their users. Herein, we outline a proposed </span>randomized control trial for evaluating the diagnostic efficacy of new AI-ECG algorithm(s) specifically designed to differentiate between </span>wide complex tachycardias<span> into ventricular tachycardia and supraventricular wide complex tachycardia.</span></p></div>","PeriodicalId":15606,"journal":{"name":"Journal of electrocardiology","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.3000,"publicationDate":"2024-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"A novel way to prospectively evaluate of AI-enhanced ECG algorithms\",\"authors\":\"\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.jelectrocard.2024.06.046\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><p><span><span>Significant strides will be made in the field of computerized electrocardiology through the development of artificial intelligence (AI)-enhanced ECG (AI-ECG) algorithms. Yet, the scientific discourse has primarily relied upon on retrospective analyses for deriving and externally validating AI-ECG classification algorithms, an approach that fails to fully judge their real-world effectiveness or reveal potential unintended consequences. Prospective trials and analyses of AI-ECG algorithms will be crucial for assessing real-world diagnostic scenarios and understanding their practical utility and degree influence they confer onto clinicians. However, conducting such studies is challenging due to their resource-intensive nature and associated technical and logistical hurdles. To overcome these challenges, we propose an innovative approach to assess AI-ECG algorithms using a virtual testing environment. This strategy can yield critical insights into the practical utility and clinical implications of novel AI-ECG algorithms. Moreover, such an approach can enable an assessment of the influence of AI-ECG algorithms have their users. Herein, we outline a proposed </span>randomized control trial for evaluating the diagnostic efficacy of new AI-ECG algorithm(s) specifically designed to differentiate between </span>wide complex tachycardias<span> into ventricular tachycardia and supraventricular wide complex tachycardia.</span></p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":15606,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of electrocardiology\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.3000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-09-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of electrocardiology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0022073624002206\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of electrocardiology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0022073624002206","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

通过开发人工智能(AI)增强型心电图(AI-ECG)算法,计算机心电图领域将取得重大进展。然而,科学界主要依靠回顾性分析来推导和外部验证人工智能心电图分类算法,这种方法无法全面判断其在现实世界中的有效性,也无法揭示潜在的意外后果。人工智能心电图算法的前瞻性试验和分析对于评估真实世界的诊断场景、了解其实际效用及其对临床医生的影响程度至关重要。然而,由于其资源密集性以及相关的技术和后勤障碍,开展此类研究具有挑战性。为了克服这些挑战,我们提出了一种利用虚拟测试环境评估人工智能心电图算法的创新方法。这种策略可以让人们深入了解新型人工智能心电图算法的实际效用和临床意义。此外,这种方法还能评估人工智能心电图算法对用户的影响。在此,我们概述了一项拟议的随机对照试验,用于评估新的人工智能心电图算法的诊断效果,该算法专门用于将宽复律心动过速区分为室性心动过速和室上性宽复律心动过速。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
A novel way to prospectively evaluate of AI-enhanced ECG algorithms

Significant strides will be made in the field of computerized electrocardiology through the development of artificial intelligence (AI)-enhanced ECG (AI-ECG) algorithms. Yet, the scientific discourse has primarily relied upon on retrospective analyses for deriving and externally validating AI-ECG classification algorithms, an approach that fails to fully judge their real-world effectiveness or reveal potential unintended consequences. Prospective trials and analyses of AI-ECG algorithms will be crucial for assessing real-world diagnostic scenarios and understanding their practical utility and degree influence they confer onto clinicians. However, conducting such studies is challenging due to their resource-intensive nature and associated technical and logistical hurdles. To overcome these challenges, we propose an innovative approach to assess AI-ECG algorithms using a virtual testing environment. This strategy can yield critical insights into the practical utility and clinical implications of novel AI-ECG algorithms. Moreover, such an approach can enable an assessment of the influence of AI-ECG algorithms have their users. Herein, we outline a proposed randomized control trial for evaluating the diagnostic efficacy of new AI-ECG algorithm(s) specifically designed to differentiate between wide complex tachycardias into ventricular tachycardia and supraventricular wide complex tachycardia.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of electrocardiology
Journal of electrocardiology 医学-心血管系统
CiteScore
2.70
自引率
7.70%
发文量
152
审稿时长
38 days
期刊介绍: The Journal of Electrocardiology is devoted exclusively to clinical and experimental studies of the electrical activities of the heart. It seeks to contribute significantly to the accuracy of diagnosis and prognosis and the effective treatment, prevention, or delay of heart disease. Editorial contents include electrocardiography, vectorcardiography, arrhythmias, membrane action potential, cardiac pacing, monitoring defibrillation, instrumentation, drug effects, and computer applications.
期刊最新文献
The de Winter electrocardiographic pattern: A systematic review of case reports. Nonparoxysmal junctional tachycardia associated with 3:2 Wenckebach exit block in the absence of digitalis therapy Study on the feasibility of distinguishing ventricular and pre-excited arrhythmia rhythms by a new algorithm The ECG of a 6-year-old girl Use of ST/HR hysteresis decreases false positive rate in exercise electrocardiography test of middle-aged asymptomatic women
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1