合格的肾损伤生物标志物在早期临床药物开发过程中显示出价值。

IF 3.4 3区 医学 Q2 TOXICOLOGY Toxicological Sciences Pub Date : 2024-07-12 DOI:10.1093/toxsci/kfae088
Kodihalli C Ravindra, Kelly A Fader, David Potter, Zaher A Radi, Gary S Friedman, Karrie A Brenneman, Neeta B Amin, Roberta Weiss, Spencer I Danto, Karen Page, Shashi K Ramaiah, Vishal S Vaidya
{"title":"合格的肾损伤生物标志物在早期临床药物开发过程中显示出价值。","authors":"Kodihalli C Ravindra, Kelly A Fader, David Potter, Zaher A Radi, Gary S Friedman, Karrie A Brenneman, Neeta B Amin, Roberta Weiss, Spencer I Danto, Karen Page, Shashi K Ramaiah, Vishal S Vaidya","doi":"10.1093/toxsci/kfae088","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Drug-induced kidney injury (DIKI) is of significant concern, both during drug development and in clinical practice. We report a patient-centric approach for clinical implementation of the FDA-qualified kidney safety biomarker panel, highlighting Phase 1 and 2 trials for candidate therapeutics in Pfizer's portfolio (PFE-1 and PFE-2, respectively) that induced renal tubular injury in rat toxicity studies. Clusterin (CLU), cystatin-C (CysC), kidney injury molecule-1 (KIM-1), N-acetyl-beta-D-glucosaminidase (NAG), neutrophil gelatinase-associated lipocalin (NGAL), and osteopontin (OPN) were measured in urine samples from i) Phase 1 healthy volunteers (HVs; n = 12) dosed with PFE-1, ii) Phase 2 rheumatoid arthritis patients (RA; n = 266) dosed with PFE-2, iii) lupus patients on standard-of-care therapies (n = 121), and iv) healthy volunteers (n = 60). The FDA-defined composite measure (CM), calculated as the geometric mean response across the 6 biomarkers, was increased ∼30% in HVs administered 100 mg PFE-1 relative to placebo, providing evidence of DIKI. In contrast, the CM for RA patients dosed with PFE-2 was comparable to placebo controls, helping to de-risk the concern for DIKI at clinically relevant doses. Comparing individual biomarker concentrations across disease states revealed that CLU, KIM-1, NAG, NGAL, and OPN are elevated in the urine of RA and lupus patients (those without severe active proliferative lupus nephritis) relative to HVs. Overall, these case studies demonstrate the value of using the FDA-qualified kidney biomarker panel to guide risk assessment, dose selection, and clinical decision making for novel therapeutics, both in HVs and patient populations.</p>","PeriodicalId":23178,"journal":{"name":"Toxicological Sciences","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":3.4000,"publicationDate":"2024-07-12","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Qualified kidney injury biomarkers demonstrate value during early clinical drug development.\",\"authors\":\"Kodihalli C Ravindra, Kelly A Fader, David Potter, Zaher A Radi, Gary S Friedman, Karrie A Brenneman, Neeta B Amin, Roberta Weiss, Spencer I Danto, Karen Page, Shashi K Ramaiah, Vishal S Vaidya\",\"doi\":\"10.1093/toxsci/kfae088\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>Drug-induced kidney injury (DIKI) is of significant concern, both during drug development and in clinical practice. We report a patient-centric approach for clinical implementation of the FDA-qualified kidney safety biomarker panel, highlighting Phase 1 and 2 trials for candidate therapeutics in Pfizer's portfolio (PFE-1 and PFE-2, respectively) that induced renal tubular injury in rat toxicity studies. Clusterin (CLU), cystatin-C (CysC), kidney injury molecule-1 (KIM-1), N-acetyl-beta-D-glucosaminidase (NAG), neutrophil gelatinase-associated lipocalin (NGAL), and osteopontin (OPN) were measured in urine samples from i) Phase 1 healthy volunteers (HVs; n = 12) dosed with PFE-1, ii) Phase 2 rheumatoid arthritis patients (RA; n = 266) dosed with PFE-2, iii) lupus patients on standard-of-care therapies (n = 121), and iv) healthy volunteers (n = 60). The FDA-defined composite measure (CM), calculated as the geometric mean response across the 6 biomarkers, was increased ∼30% in HVs administered 100 mg PFE-1 relative to placebo, providing evidence of DIKI. In contrast, the CM for RA patients dosed with PFE-2 was comparable to placebo controls, helping to de-risk the concern for DIKI at clinically relevant doses. Comparing individual biomarker concentrations across disease states revealed that CLU, KIM-1, NAG, NGAL, and OPN are elevated in the urine of RA and lupus patients (those without severe active proliferative lupus nephritis) relative to HVs. Overall, these case studies demonstrate the value of using the FDA-qualified kidney biomarker panel to guide risk assessment, dose selection, and clinical decision making for novel therapeutics, both in HVs and patient populations.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":23178,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Toxicological Sciences\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.4000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-07-12\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Toxicological Sciences\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1093/toxsci/kfae088\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"TOXICOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Toxicological Sciences","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1093/toxsci/kfae088","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"TOXICOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

药物引起的肾损伤(DIKI)在药物开发和临床实践中都备受关注。我们报告了一种以患者为中心的方法,用于临床实施经 FDA 鉴定的肾脏安全性生物标记物面板,重点介绍了辉瑞产品组合中候选治疗药物(分别为 PFE-1 和 PFE-2)的 1 期和 2 期试验,这些药物在大鼠毒性研究中诱发了肾小管损伤。对 i) 第一阶段健康志愿者(HVs;n = 12)、ii)使用 PFE-2 的第 2 期类风湿性关节炎患者(RA;n = 266)、iii)使用标准疗法的狼疮患者(n = 121)和 iv)健康志愿者(n = 60)。FDA定义的综合指标(CM)是根据6种生物标志物的几何平均反应计算得出的,与安慰剂相比,服用100毫克PFE-1的红斑狼疮患者的CM增加了30%,为DIKI提供了证据。相比之下,服用PFE-2的RA患者的CM与安慰剂对照组相当,有助于降低临床相关剂量下的DIKI风险。比较不同疾病状态下的单个生物标记物浓度发现,相对于HVs,CLU、KIM-1、NAG、NGAL和OPN在RA和狼疮患者(无严重活动性增生性狼疮肾炎)的尿液中升高。总之,这些案例研究证明了使用经 FDA 鉴定的肾脏生物标记物面板来指导新型疗法的风险评估、剂量选择和临床决策的价值,无论是在 HVs 还是在患者群体中都是如此。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Qualified kidney injury biomarkers demonstrate value during early clinical drug development.

Drug-induced kidney injury (DIKI) is of significant concern, both during drug development and in clinical practice. We report a patient-centric approach for clinical implementation of the FDA-qualified kidney safety biomarker panel, highlighting Phase 1 and 2 trials for candidate therapeutics in Pfizer's portfolio (PFE-1 and PFE-2, respectively) that induced renal tubular injury in rat toxicity studies. Clusterin (CLU), cystatin-C (CysC), kidney injury molecule-1 (KIM-1), N-acetyl-beta-D-glucosaminidase (NAG), neutrophil gelatinase-associated lipocalin (NGAL), and osteopontin (OPN) were measured in urine samples from i) Phase 1 healthy volunteers (HVs; n = 12) dosed with PFE-1, ii) Phase 2 rheumatoid arthritis patients (RA; n = 266) dosed with PFE-2, iii) lupus patients on standard-of-care therapies (n = 121), and iv) healthy volunteers (n = 60). The FDA-defined composite measure (CM), calculated as the geometric mean response across the 6 biomarkers, was increased ∼30% in HVs administered 100 mg PFE-1 relative to placebo, providing evidence of DIKI. In contrast, the CM for RA patients dosed with PFE-2 was comparable to placebo controls, helping to de-risk the concern for DIKI at clinically relevant doses. Comparing individual biomarker concentrations across disease states revealed that CLU, KIM-1, NAG, NGAL, and OPN are elevated in the urine of RA and lupus patients (those without severe active proliferative lupus nephritis) relative to HVs. Overall, these case studies demonstrate the value of using the FDA-qualified kidney biomarker panel to guide risk assessment, dose selection, and clinical decision making for novel therapeutics, both in HVs and patient populations.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Toxicological Sciences
Toxicological Sciences 医学-毒理学
CiteScore
7.70
自引率
7.90%
发文量
118
审稿时长
1.5 months
期刊介绍: The mission of Toxicological Sciences, the official journal of the Society of Toxicology, is to publish a broad spectrum of impactful research in the field of toxicology. The primary focus of Toxicological Sciences is on original research articles. The journal also provides expert insight via contemporary and systematic reviews, as well as forum articles and editorial content that addresses important topics in the field. The scope of Toxicological Sciences is focused on a broad spectrum of impactful toxicological research that will advance the multidisciplinary field of toxicology ranging from basic research to model development and application, and decision making. Submissions will include diverse technologies and approaches including, but not limited to: bioinformatics and computational biology, biochemistry, exposure science, histopathology, mass spectrometry, molecular biology, population-based sciences, tissue and cell-based systems, and whole-animal studies. Integrative approaches that combine realistic exposure scenarios with impactful analyses that move the field forward are encouraged.
期刊最新文献
Immune checkpoint blockade lowers the threshold of naïve T-cell priming to drug-associated antigens in a dose-dependent fashion Urinary bladder carcinogenic potential of 4,4’-methylenebis(2-chloroaniline) in humanized-liver mice Pharmacokinetic Analysis of Nicotine and Its Metabolites (Cotinine and trans-3′-Hydroxycotinine) in Male Sprague-Dawley Rats Following Nose-Only Inhalation, Oral Gavage, and Intravenous Infusion of Nicotine Unraveling the Hemolytic Toxicity Tapestry of Peptides using Chemical Space Complex Networks Exploring the Interplay Between Cannabinoids and Thymic Functions
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1