评估麻醉下检查时施加的力,用于确定髋臼后壁骨折的稳定性。

IF 2.6 2区 医学 Q1 ORTHOPEDICS Journal of the American Academy of Orthopaedic Surgeons Pub Date : 2024-11-15 Epub Date: 2024-07-11 DOI:10.5435/JAAOS-D-21-00763
Adam Keith Lee, Cory Alan Collinge
{"title":"评估麻醉下检查时施加的力,用于确定髋臼后壁骨折的稳定性。","authors":"Adam Keith Lee, Cory Alan Collinge","doi":"10.5435/JAAOS-D-21-00763","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>Determination of hip instability associated with posterior wall acetabular fractures may be difficult. Thus, dynamic stress examination under anesthesia (EUA) was developed as a tool for guiding treatment. EUA uses positioning of the hip and application of force across the hip to detect instability. While aspects of the EUA technique seems consistently described in the literature and practiced by surgeons, some components are ill-defined. The goal of this study was to assess standardization of applied force during EUA among experienced acetabular surgeons.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Fellowship-trained orthopaedic trauma surgeons with experience in acetabular fracture treatment performed EUA for posterior wall instability on an intact, fresh human cadaver. All surgeons used a similar method, and each expert performed EUA multiple times separated by a brief hiatus. The maximum force applied along the femur's vector in Newtons (N) was measured using a hand-held digital dynamometer.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The EUAs of 19 surgeons were evaluated. Five surgeons had been practicing for <5 years, six for 6 to 10 years, five for 11 to 20 years, and three for >20 years. The mean force applied during EUA was 173N, with a notable variability between surgeons (range, 77-368N). Notable variability was also observed between sequential measures of individual surgeons with six surgeons (31.6%) having a >50N range on repeat trials.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>This is the first study to report force applied during an EUA to assess for posterior wall acetabular fracture stability. Notable variability was observed among surgeons performing the examination and in repeated examinations by the same surgeon, suggesting that results of EUA may be surgeon-dependent. Further study is needed to determine what optimal applied force should be used to assess hip stability after a posterior wall acetabular fracture.</p><p><strong>Level of evidence: </strong>Level V. An assessment of a diagnostic tool.</p>","PeriodicalId":51098,"journal":{"name":"Journal of the American Academy of Orthopaedic Surgeons","volume":" ","pages":"1038-1042"},"PeriodicalIF":2.6000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Assessment of Force Applied During Examination Under Anesthesia Used to Determine Stability in Posterior Wall Acetabular Fractures.\",\"authors\":\"Adam Keith Lee, Cory Alan Collinge\",\"doi\":\"10.5435/JAAOS-D-21-00763\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>Determination of hip instability associated with posterior wall acetabular fractures may be difficult. Thus, dynamic stress examination under anesthesia (EUA) was developed as a tool for guiding treatment. EUA uses positioning of the hip and application of force across the hip to detect instability. While aspects of the EUA technique seems consistently described in the literature and practiced by surgeons, some components are ill-defined. The goal of this study was to assess standardization of applied force during EUA among experienced acetabular surgeons.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Fellowship-trained orthopaedic trauma surgeons with experience in acetabular fracture treatment performed EUA for posterior wall instability on an intact, fresh human cadaver. All surgeons used a similar method, and each expert performed EUA multiple times separated by a brief hiatus. The maximum force applied along the femur's vector in Newtons (N) was measured using a hand-held digital dynamometer.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The EUAs of 19 surgeons were evaluated. Five surgeons had been practicing for <5 years, six for 6 to 10 years, five for 11 to 20 years, and three for >20 years. The mean force applied during EUA was 173N, with a notable variability between surgeons (range, 77-368N). Notable variability was also observed between sequential measures of individual surgeons with six surgeons (31.6%) having a >50N range on repeat trials.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>This is the first study to report force applied during an EUA to assess for posterior wall acetabular fracture stability. Notable variability was observed among surgeons performing the examination and in repeated examinations by the same surgeon, suggesting that results of EUA may be surgeon-dependent. Further study is needed to determine what optimal applied force should be used to assess hip stability after a posterior wall acetabular fracture.</p><p><strong>Level of evidence: </strong>Level V. An assessment of a diagnostic tool.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":51098,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of the American Academy of Orthopaedic Surgeons\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"1038-1042\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.6000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-11-15\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of the American Academy of Orthopaedic Surgeons\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.5435/JAAOS-D-21-00763\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2024/7/11 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"ORTHOPEDICS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of the American Academy of Orthopaedic Surgeons","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5435/JAAOS-D-21-00763","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/7/11 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ORTHOPEDICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的:确定与髋臼后壁骨折相关的髋关节不稳定性可能很困难。因此,麻醉下动态应力检查(EUA)应运而生,成为指导治疗的一种工具。麻醉下动态应力检查采用髋关节定位和髋关节施力的方法来检测髋关节的不稳定性。虽然文献和外科医生的实践中似乎一直在描述EUA技术的各个方面,但有些部分却没有明确定义。本研究的目的是评估经验丰富的髋臼外科医生在EUA过程中施力的标准化程度:方法:接受过研究员培训、具有髋臼骨折治疗经验的创伤骨科外科医生在一具完整、新鲜的人体尸体上进行了后壁不稳定的EUA手术。所有外科医生都使用了类似的方法,每位专家都进行了多次EUA,中间有短暂的间歇。使用手持式数字测力计测量了沿股骨矢量施加的最大力(牛顿):结果:评估了 19 名外科医生的 EUA。结果:对 19 名外科医生的股外侧肌力进行了评估,其中 5 名外科医生已从业 20 年。EUA期间施加的平均力为173牛顿,不同外科医生之间存在显著差异(范围为77-368牛顿)。外科医生之间的连续测量结果也存在显著差异,有六位外科医生(31.6%)在重复试验中的施力范围>50N:结论:这是第一项报告在评估髋臼后壁骨折稳定性的EUA过程中施力情况的研究。在进行检查的外科医生之间以及在同一外科医生的重复检查中观察到明显的差异,这表明EUA的结果可能取决于外科医生。需要进一步研究以确定在髋臼后壁骨折后评估髋关节稳定性时应使用何种最佳作用力:诊断工具评估。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Assessment of Force Applied During Examination Under Anesthesia Used to Determine Stability in Posterior Wall Acetabular Fractures.

Objectives: Determination of hip instability associated with posterior wall acetabular fractures may be difficult. Thus, dynamic stress examination under anesthesia (EUA) was developed as a tool for guiding treatment. EUA uses positioning of the hip and application of force across the hip to detect instability. While aspects of the EUA technique seems consistently described in the literature and practiced by surgeons, some components are ill-defined. The goal of this study was to assess standardization of applied force during EUA among experienced acetabular surgeons.

Methods: Fellowship-trained orthopaedic trauma surgeons with experience in acetabular fracture treatment performed EUA for posterior wall instability on an intact, fresh human cadaver. All surgeons used a similar method, and each expert performed EUA multiple times separated by a brief hiatus. The maximum force applied along the femur's vector in Newtons (N) was measured using a hand-held digital dynamometer.

Results: The EUAs of 19 surgeons were evaluated. Five surgeons had been practicing for <5 years, six for 6 to 10 years, five for 11 to 20 years, and three for >20 years. The mean force applied during EUA was 173N, with a notable variability between surgeons (range, 77-368N). Notable variability was also observed between sequential measures of individual surgeons with six surgeons (31.6%) having a >50N range on repeat trials.

Conclusion: This is the first study to report force applied during an EUA to assess for posterior wall acetabular fracture stability. Notable variability was observed among surgeons performing the examination and in repeated examinations by the same surgeon, suggesting that results of EUA may be surgeon-dependent. Further study is needed to determine what optimal applied force should be used to assess hip stability after a posterior wall acetabular fracture.

Level of evidence: Level V. An assessment of a diagnostic tool.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
6.10
自引率
6.20%
发文量
529
审稿时长
4-8 weeks
期刊介绍: The Journal of the American Academy of Orthopaedic Surgeons was established in the fall of 1993 by the Academy in response to its membership’s demand for a clinical review journal. Two issues were published the first year, followed by six issues yearly from 1994 through 2004. In September 2005, JAAOS began publishing monthly issues. Each issue includes richly illustrated peer-reviewed articles focused on clinical diagnosis and management. Special features in each issue provide commentary on developments in pharmacotherapeutics, materials and techniques, and computer applications.
期刊最新文献
The 2024 Kappa Delta and OREF Awards. The 2024 Kappa Delta Young Investigator Award: Leveraging Insights From Development to Improve Adult Repair: Hedgehog Signaling as a Master Regulator of Enthesis Fibrocartilage Formation. The Role of Amino Acid Supplementation in Orthopaedic Surgery: Erratum. Risk Factors of Failure to Discharge Before "Two Midnights" in Outpatient-Designated Total Hip Arthroplasty. Cost Difference in Performing Total Knee Arthroplasty at Ambulatory Surgical Centers Compared With Hospital-Based Outpatient Departments: Observational Study.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1