Ithan D Peltan, Joseph R Bledsoe, Jason R Jacobs, Danielle Groat, Carolyn Klippel, Michelle Adamson, Gabriel A Hooper, Nick J Tinker, Rachel A Foster, Edward A Stenehjem, Tamara D Moores Todd, Adam Balls, Jennifer Avery, Gary Brunson, Jon Jones, Jeremy Bair, Andrew Dorais, Matthew H Samore, Catherine L Hough, Samuel M Brown
{"title":"急诊科败血症代码协议的有效性和安全性:实用临床试验","authors":"Ithan D Peltan, Joseph R Bledsoe, Jason R Jacobs, Danielle Groat, Carolyn Klippel, Michelle Adamson, Gabriel A Hooper, Nick J Tinker, Rachel A Foster, Edward A Stenehjem, Tamara D Moores Todd, Adam Balls, Jennifer Avery, Gary Brunson, Jon Jones, Jeremy Bair, Andrew Dorais, Matthew H Samore, Catherine L Hough, Samuel M Brown","doi":"10.1513/AnnalsATS.202403-286OC","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p><b>Rationale:</b> Sepsis care delivery-including the initiation of prompt, appropriate antimicrobials-remains suboptimal. <b>Objectives:</b> This study was conducted to determine direct and off-target effects of emergency department (ED) sepsis care reorganization. <b>Methods:</b> This pragmatic pilot trial enrolled adult patients who presented from November 2019 to February 2021 to an ED in Utah before and after implementation of a multimodal, team-based \"Code Sepsis\" protocol. Patients who presented to two other EDs where usual care was continued served as contemporaneous control subjects. The primary outcome was door-to-antimicrobial time among patients meeting Sepsis-3 criteria before ED departure. Secondary and safety outcomes included all-cause 30-day mortality, antimicrobial utilization and overtreatment, and antimicrobial-associated adverse events. Multivariable regression analyses used difference-in-differences methods to account for trends in outcomes unrelated to the studied intervention. <b>Results:</b> Code Sepsis protocol activation (<i>N</i> = 307) exhibited 8.5% sensitivity and 66% positive predictive value for patients meeting sepsis criteria before ED departure. Among 10,151 patients who met sepsis criteria during the study, adjusted difference-in-differences analysis demonstrated a 13-minute (95% confidence interval = 7-19) decrease in door-to-antimicrobial time associated with Code Sepsis implementation (<i>P</i> < 0.001). Mortality and clinical safety outcomes were unchanged, but Code Sepsis implementation was associated with increased false-positive presumptive infection diagnoses among patients who met sepsis criteria in the ED and increased antimicrobial utilization. <b>Conclusions:</b> Implementation of a team-based protocol for rapid sepsis evaluation and treatment during the coronavirus disease (COVID-19) pandemic's first year was associated with decreased ED door-to-antimicrobial time but also increased antimicrobial utilization. Measurement of both patient-centered and off-target effects of sepsis care improvement interventions is essential to comprehensive assessment of their value. Clinical trial registered with www.clinicaltrials.gov (NCT04148989).</p>","PeriodicalId":93876,"journal":{"name":"Annals of the American Thoracic Society","volume":" ","pages":"1560-1571"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11568504/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Effectiveness and Safety of an Emergency Department Code Sepsis Protocol: A Pragmatic Clinical Trial.\",\"authors\":\"Ithan D Peltan, Joseph R Bledsoe, Jason R Jacobs, Danielle Groat, Carolyn Klippel, Michelle Adamson, Gabriel A Hooper, Nick J Tinker, Rachel A Foster, Edward A Stenehjem, Tamara D Moores Todd, Adam Balls, Jennifer Avery, Gary Brunson, Jon Jones, Jeremy Bair, Andrew Dorais, Matthew H Samore, Catherine L Hough, Samuel M Brown\",\"doi\":\"10.1513/AnnalsATS.202403-286OC\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p><b>Rationale:</b> Sepsis care delivery-including the initiation of prompt, appropriate antimicrobials-remains suboptimal. <b>Objectives:</b> This study was conducted to determine direct and off-target effects of emergency department (ED) sepsis care reorganization. <b>Methods:</b> This pragmatic pilot trial enrolled adult patients who presented from November 2019 to February 2021 to an ED in Utah before and after implementation of a multimodal, team-based \\\"Code Sepsis\\\" protocol. Patients who presented to two other EDs where usual care was continued served as contemporaneous control subjects. The primary outcome was door-to-antimicrobial time among patients meeting Sepsis-3 criteria before ED departure. Secondary and safety outcomes included all-cause 30-day mortality, antimicrobial utilization and overtreatment, and antimicrobial-associated adverse events. Multivariable regression analyses used difference-in-differences methods to account for trends in outcomes unrelated to the studied intervention. <b>Results:</b> Code Sepsis protocol activation (<i>N</i> = 307) exhibited 8.5% sensitivity and 66% positive predictive value for patients meeting sepsis criteria before ED departure. Among 10,151 patients who met sepsis criteria during the study, adjusted difference-in-differences analysis demonstrated a 13-minute (95% confidence interval = 7-19) decrease in door-to-antimicrobial time associated with Code Sepsis implementation (<i>P</i> < 0.001). Mortality and clinical safety outcomes were unchanged, but Code Sepsis implementation was associated with increased false-positive presumptive infection diagnoses among patients who met sepsis criteria in the ED and increased antimicrobial utilization. <b>Conclusions:</b> Implementation of a team-based protocol for rapid sepsis evaluation and treatment during the coronavirus disease (COVID-19) pandemic's first year was associated with decreased ED door-to-antimicrobial time but also increased antimicrobial utilization. Measurement of both patient-centered and off-target effects of sepsis care improvement interventions is essential to comprehensive assessment of their value. Clinical trial registered with www.clinicaltrials.gov (NCT04148989).</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":93876,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Annals of the American Thoracic Society\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"1560-1571\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-11-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11568504/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Annals of the American Thoracic Society\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1513/AnnalsATS.202403-286OC\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Annals of the American Thoracic Society","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1513/AnnalsATS.202403-286OC","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
Effectiveness and Safety of an Emergency Department Code Sepsis Protocol: A Pragmatic Clinical Trial.
Rationale: Sepsis care delivery-including the initiation of prompt, appropriate antimicrobials-remains suboptimal. Objectives: This study was conducted to determine direct and off-target effects of emergency department (ED) sepsis care reorganization. Methods: This pragmatic pilot trial enrolled adult patients who presented from November 2019 to February 2021 to an ED in Utah before and after implementation of a multimodal, team-based "Code Sepsis" protocol. Patients who presented to two other EDs where usual care was continued served as contemporaneous control subjects. The primary outcome was door-to-antimicrobial time among patients meeting Sepsis-3 criteria before ED departure. Secondary and safety outcomes included all-cause 30-day mortality, antimicrobial utilization and overtreatment, and antimicrobial-associated adverse events. Multivariable regression analyses used difference-in-differences methods to account for trends in outcomes unrelated to the studied intervention. Results: Code Sepsis protocol activation (N = 307) exhibited 8.5% sensitivity and 66% positive predictive value for patients meeting sepsis criteria before ED departure. Among 10,151 patients who met sepsis criteria during the study, adjusted difference-in-differences analysis demonstrated a 13-minute (95% confidence interval = 7-19) decrease in door-to-antimicrobial time associated with Code Sepsis implementation (P < 0.001). Mortality and clinical safety outcomes were unchanged, but Code Sepsis implementation was associated with increased false-positive presumptive infection diagnoses among patients who met sepsis criteria in the ED and increased antimicrobial utilization. Conclusions: Implementation of a team-based protocol for rapid sepsis evaluation and treatment during the coronavirus disease (COVID-19) pandemic's first year was associated with decreased ED door-to-antimicrobial time but also increased antimicrobial utilization. Measurement of both patient-centered and off-target effects of sepsis care improvement interventions is essential to comprehensive assessment of their value. Clinical trial registered with www.clinicaltrials.gov (NCT04148989).