影响乳腺癌和肠癌转移性系统疗法患者流动性的医院因素:全国人口评估》。

IF 3.2 3区 医学 Q2 ONCOLOGY Clinical oncology Pub Date : 2024-06-26 DOI:10.1016/j.clon.2024.06.050
{"title":"影响乳腺癌和肠癌转移性系统疗法患者流动性的医院因素:全国人口评估》。","authors":"","doi":"10.1016/j.clon.2024.06.050","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Aims</h3><p>This national study investigated hospital quality and patient factors associated with treatment location for systemic anticancer treatment (SACT) in patients with metastatic cancers.</p></div><div><h3>Materials and methods</h3><p>Using linked administrative datasets from the English NHS, we identified all patients diagnosed with metastatic breast and bowel cancer between 1 January 2016 and 31 December 2018, who subsequently received SACT within 4 months from diagnosis. The extent to which patients bypassed their nearest hospital was investigated using a geographic information system (ArcGIS). Conditional logistic regression models were used to estimate the impact of travel time, hospital quality and patient characteristics on where patients underwent SACT.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>541 of 2,364 women (22.9%) diagnosed with metastatic breast cancer, and 2,809 of 10,050 (28.0%) patients diagnosed with metastatic bowel cancer bypassed their nearest hospital providing SACT. There was a strong preference for receiving treatment at hospitals near where patients lived (p &lt; 0.001). However, patients who were younger (p = 0.043 for breast cancer; p &lt; 0.001 for bowel cancer) or from rural areas (p = 0.001 for breast cancer; p &lt; 0.001 for bowel cancer) were more likely to travel to more distant hospitals. Patients diagnosed with rectal cancer were more likely to travel further for SACT than patients with colon cancer (p = 0.002). Patients were more likely to travel to comprehensive cancer centres (p = 0.019 for bowel cancer) and designated Experimental Cancer Medicine Centres (ECMCs) although the latter association was not significant. Patients were less likely to receive SACT in hospitals with the highest readmission rates (p = 0.046 for bowel cancer).</p></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><p>Patients with metastatic cancer receiving primary SACT are prepared to travel to alternative more distant hospitals for treatment with a preference for larger comprehensive centres providing multimodal care or hospitals which offer early phase cancer clinical trials.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":10403,"journal":{"name":"Clinical oncology","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":3.2000,"publicationDate":"2024-06-26","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0936655524002747/pdfft?md5=cdf54b37ca8764f24045ef607daaf9dc&pid=1-s2.0-S0936655524002747-main.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Hospital Factors Influencing the Mobility of Patients for Systemic Therapies in Breast and Bowel Cancer in the Metastatic Setting: A National Population-based Evaluation\",\"authors\":\"\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.clon.2024.06.050\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><h3>Aims</h3><p>This national study investigated hospital quality and patient factors associated with treatment location for systemic anticancer treatment (SACT) in patients with metastatic cancers.</p></div><div><h3>Materials and methods</h3><p>Using linked administrative datasets from the English NHS, we identified all patients diagnosed with metastatic breast and bowel cancer between 1 January 2016 and 31 December 2018, who subsequently received SACT within 4 months from diagnosis. The extent to which patients bypassed their nearest hospital was investigated using a geographic information system (ArcGIS). Conditional logistic regression models were used to estimate the impact of travel time, hospital quality and patient characteristics on where patients underwent SACT.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>541 of 2,364 women (22.9%) diagnosed with metastatic breast cancer, and 2,809 of 10,050 (28.0%) patients diagnosed with metastatic bowel cancer bypassed their nearest hospital providing SACT. There was a strong preference for receiving treatment at hospitals near where patients lived (p &lt; 0.001). However, patients who were younger (p = 0.043 for breast cancer; p &lt; 0.001 for bowel cancer) or from rural areas (p = 0.001 for breast cancer; p &lt; 0.001 for bowel cancer) were more likely to travel to more distant hospitals. Patients diagnosed with rectal cancer were more likely to travel further for SACT than patients with colon cancer (p = 0.002). Patients were more likely to travel to comprehensive cancer centres (p = 0.019 for bowel cancer) and designated Experimental Cancer Medicine Centres (ECMCs) although the latter association was not significant. Patients were less likely to receive SACT in hospitals with the highest readmission rates (p = 0.046 for bowel cancer).</p></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><p>Patients with metastatic cancer receiving primary SACT are prepared to travel to alternative more distant hospitals for treatment with a preference for larger comprehensive centres providing multimodal care or hospitals which offer early phase cancer clinical trials.</p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":10403,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Clinical oncology\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.2000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-06-26\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0936655524002747/pdfft?md5=cdf54b37ca8764f24045ef607daaf9dc&pid=1-s2.0-S0936655524002747-main.pdf\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Clinical oncology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0936655524002747\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"ONCOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Clinical oncology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0936655524002747","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ONCOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的:这项全国性研究调查了与转移性癌症患者全身抗癌治疗(SACT)治疗地点相关的医院质量和患者因素:利用英国国家医疗服务系统(NHS)的关联行政数据集,我们确定了2016年1月1日至2018年12月31日期间确诊为转移性乳腺癌和肠癌的所有患者,这些患者随后在确诊后4个月内接受了SACT治疗。我们使用地理信息系统(ArcGIS)调查了患者绕过最近医院的程度。利用条件逻辑回归模型估算了旅行时间、医院质量和患者特征对患者接受SACT的影响:结果:2364 名女性转移性乳腺癌患者中有 541 人(22.9%)和 10,050 名转移性肠癌患者中有 2,809 人(28.0%)绕过了距离最近的提供 SACT 的医院。患者强烈倾向于在居住地附近的医院接受治疗(p < 0.001)。然而,年龄较轻(乳腺癌患者 p = 0.043;肠癌患者 p < 0.001)或来自农村地区(乳腺癌患者 p = 0.001;肠癌患者 p < 0.001)的患者更倾向于前往较远的医院接受治疗。与结肠癌患者相比,直肠癌患者更有可能前往更远的医院接受 SACT 治疗(p = 0.002)。患者更有可能前往综合癌症中心(肠癌患者 p = 0.019)和指定的实验癌症医学中心(ECMC),但后者的相关性并不显著。患者不太可能在再入院率最高的医院接受SACT治疗(肠癌患者的P = 0.046):结论:接受初级 SACT 治疗的转移性癌症患者愿意前往其他较远的医院接受治疗,他们更倾向于选择提供多模式治疗的大型综合中心或提供早期癌症临床试验的医院。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Hospital Factors Influencing the Mobility of Patients for Systemic Therapies in Breast and Bowel Cancer in the Metastatic Setting: A National Population-based Evaluation

Aims

This national study investigated hospital quality and patient factors associated with treatment location for systemic anticancer treatment (SACT) in patients with metastatic cancers.

Materials and methods

Using linked administrative datasets from the English NHS, we identified all patients diagnosed with metastatic breast and bowel cancer between 1 January 2016 and 31 December 2018, who subsequently received SACT within 4 months from diagnosis. The extent to which patients bypassed their nearest hospital was investigated using a geographic information system (ArcGIS). Conditional logistic regression models were used to estimate the impact of travel time, hospital quality and patient characteristics on where patients underwent SACT.

Results

541 of 2,364 women (22.9%) diagnosed with metastatic breast cancer, and 2,809 of 10,050 (28.0%) patients diagnosed with metastatic bowel cancer bypassed their nearest hospital providing SACT. There was a strong preference for receiving treatment at hospitals near where patients lived (p < 0.001). However, patients who were younger (p = 0.043 for breast cancer; p < 0.001 for bowel cancer) or from rural areas (p = 0.001 for breast cancer; p < 0.001 for bowel cancer) were more likely to travel to more distant hospitals. Patients diagnosed with rectal cancer were more likely to travel further for SACT than patients with colon cancer (p = 0.002). Patients were more likely to travel to comprehensive cancer centres (p = 0.019 for bowel cancer) and designated Experimental Cancer Medicine Centres (ECMCs) although the latter association was not significant. Patients were less likely to receive SACT in hospitals with the highest readmission rates (p = 0.046 for bowel cancer).

Conclusion

Patients with metastatic cancer receiving primary SACT are prepared to travel to alternative more distant hospitals for treatment with a preference for larger comprehensive centres providing multimodal care or hospitals which offer early phase cancer clinical trials.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Clinical oncology
Clinical oncology 医学-肿瘤学
CiteScore
5.20
自引率
8.80%
发文量
332
审稿时长
40 days
期刊介绍: Clinical Oncology is an International cancer journal covering all aspects of the clinical management of cancer patients, reflecting a multidisciplinary approach to therapy. Papers, editorials and reviews are published on all types of malignant disease embracing, pathology, diagnosis and treatment, including radiotherapy, chemotherapy, surgery, combined modality treatment and palliative care. Research and review papers covering epidemiology, radiobiology, radiation physics, tumour biology, and immunology are also published, together with letters to the editor, case reports and book reviews.
期刊最新文献
PD-1/PD-L1 Inhibitors in Combination With Chemo or as Monotherapy vs. Chemotherapy Alone in Advanced, Unresectable HER2-Negative Gastric, Gastroesophageal Junction, and Esophageal Adenocarcinoma: A Meta-Analysis. "If You're Talking, I Think You're Muted": Follow-up Analysis of Weekly Peer Review Discussion and Plan Changes After Transitioning From Virtual to In-Person Format. The Current use of Adaptive Strategies for External Beam Radiotherapy in Cervical Cancer: A Systematic Review. The Use of Artificial Intelligence Technologies in Cancer Care. Response Letter to Laurelli et al. Letter to the Editor Regarding Enhancing Telemedicine to Improve Global Radiotherapy Access.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1