产后早期不同脐带钳夹策略的安全性。

IF 2.2 3区 医学 Q2 OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY Early human development Pub Date : 2024-07-10 DOI:10.1016/j.earlhumdev.2024.106075
Akan Yaman , Kamil Sharifov , Asli Memisoglu , Ibrahim Kandemir , Baran Cengiz Arcagok , Hulya Selva Bilgen , Sibel Sakarya , Eren Ozek
{"title":"产后早期不同脐带钳夹策略的安全性。","authors":"Akan Yaman ,&nbsp;Kamil Sharifov ,&nbsp;Asli Memisoglu ,&nbsp;Ibrahim Kandemir ,&nbsp;Baran Cengiz Arcagok ,&nbsp;Hulya Selva Bilgen ,&nbsp;Sibel Sakarya ,&nbsp;Eren Ozek","doi":"10.1016/j.earlhumdev.2024.106075","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Background</h3><p>This study aimed to evaluate the effect of ICC (cord clamping within the first 15 s), DCC (delayed cord clamping at 60 s), and cut-UCM (cut-umbilical cord milking, cord clamping within the first 15 s) groups on oxygen saturation (SpO2), heart rate (HR), and perfusion index (PI) up to 10 min after birth in newborn infants.</p></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><p>We conducted this randomized clinical trial in the delivery unit of a University Hospital with 189 infants born between 35 and 42 weeks of gestation. Participants were randomly assigned to one of three groups: ICC, DCC, and cut-UCM. The primary outcomes measured were SpO2, HR, and PI at the 1st, 3rd, 5th, and 10th minutes after birth. We utilized ANOVA and Bayesian calculations in this study.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>There was no difference between the ICC, DCC, and cut-UCM groups in SpO2, HR, and PI values at the 1st, 3rd, 5th, and 10th minutes of life, which did not significantly alter between the three groups in one-way ANOVA. Bayesian repeated-measure ANOVA calculations showed that SpO2 and heart rate results at the 1st, 3rd, 5th, and 10th minutes did not differ between ICC, DCC, and cut-UCM techniques with strong evidence. At the 3rd minute, PI was slightly higher in the DCC and cut-UCM groups compared to the ICC group, with anecdotal evidence. We found no difference between DCC and cut-UCM regarding the 3rd-minute PI, with moderate evidence.</p></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><p>Umbilical clamping procedures (ICC, DCC, and cut-UCM) did not affect SpO2 and HR in the first ten minutes of life, but 3rd-minute PI values were slightly higher in DCC and cut-UCM compared with ICC among late preterm and term neonates.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":11435,"journal":{"name":"Early human development","volume":"195 ","pages":"Article 106075"},"PeriodicalIF":2.2000,"publicationDate":"2024-07-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Safety of different cord clamping strategies in the early postnatal period\",\"authors\":\"Akan Yaman ,&nbsp;Kamil Sharifov ,&nbsp;Asli Memisoglu ,&nbsp;Ibrahim Kandemir ,&nbsp;Baran Cengiz Arcagok ,&nbsp;Hulya Selva Bilgen ,&nbsp;Sibel Sakarya ,&nbsp;Eren Ozek\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.earlhumdev.2024.106075\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><h3>Background</h3><p>This study aimed to evaluate the effect of ICC (cord clamping within the first 15 s), DCC (delayed cord clamping at 60 s), and cut-UCM (cut-umbilical cord milking, cord clamping within the first 15 s) groups on oxygen saturation (SpO2), heart rate (HR), and perfusion index (PI) up to 10 min after birth in newborn infants.</p></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><p>We conducted this randomized clinical trial in the delivery unit of a University Hospital with 189 infants born between 35 and 42 weeks of gestation. Participants were randomly assigned to one of three groups: ICC, DCC, and cut-UCM. The primary outcomes measured were SpO2, HR, and PI at the 1st, 3rd, 5th, and 10th minutes after birth. We utilized ANOVA and Bayesian calculations in this study.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>There was no difference between the ICC, DCC, and cut-UCM groups in SpO2, HR, and PI values at the 1st, 3rd, 5th, and 10th minutes of life, which did not significantly alter between the three groups in one-way ANOVA. Bayesian repeated-measure ANOVA calculations showed that SpO2 and heart rate results at the 1st, 3rd, 5th, and 10th minutes did not differ between ICC, DCC, and cut-UCM techniques with strong evidence. At the 3rd minute, PI was slightly higher in the DCC and cut-UCM groups compared to the ICC group, with anecdotal evidence. We found no difference between DCC and cut-UCM regarding the 3rd-minute PI, with moderate evidence.</p></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><p>Umbilical clamping procedures (ICC, DCC, and cut-UCM) did not affect SpO2 and HR in the first ten minutes of life, but 3rd-minute PI values were slightly higher in DCC and cut-UCM compared with ICC among late preterm and term neonates.</p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":11435,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Early human development\",\"volume\":\"195 \",\"pages\":\"Article 106075\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.2000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-07-10\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Early human development\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0378378224001440\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Early human development","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0378378224001440","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:本研究旨在评估 ICC(在最初 15 秒内夹紧脐带)、DCC(延迟 60 秒夹紧脐带)和剪断-UCM(剪断脐带挤奶,在最初 15 秒内夹紧脐带)组对新生儿出生后 10 分钟内血氧饱和度(SpO2)、心率(HR)和灌注指数(PI)的影响:我们在一家大学医院的产科进行了这项随机临床试验,共有 189 名妊娠 35 至 42 周的新生儿参加。参与者被随机分配到三组中的一组:ICC、DCC 和 cut-UCM。测量的主要结果是出生后第 1、3、5 和 10 分钟的 SpO2、HR 和 PI。本研究采用方差分析和贝叶斯计算方法:在单因素方差分析中,ICC 组、DCC 组和 cut-UCM 组在出生后第 1、3、5 和 10 分钟的 SpO2、HR 和 PI 值没有显著差异。贝叶斯重复测量方差分析计算显示,ICC、DCC 和 cut-UCM 技术在第 1、3、5 和 10 分钟的 SpO2 和心率结果没有差异,证据确凿。在第 3 分钟时,DCC 组和切割 UCM 组的 PI 略高于 ICC 组,这也是传闻证据。我们发现 DCC 和切开 UCM 在第 3 分钟的 PI 方面没有差异,证据适中:结论:在晚期早产儿和足月新生儿中,脐带钳夹术(ICC、DCC 和 cut-UCM)不影响出生后 10 分钟内的 SpO2 和心率,但 DCC 和 cut-UCM 组第 3 分钟的 PI 值略高于 ICC 组。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Safety of different cord clamping strategies in the early postnatal period

Background

This study aimed to evaluate the effect of ICC (cord clamping within the first 15 s), DCC (delayed cord clamping at 60 s), and cut-UCM (cut-umbilical cord milking, cord clamping within the first 15 s) groups on oxygen saturation (SpO2), heart rate (HR), and perfusion index (PI) up to 10 min after birth in newborn infants.

Methods

We conducted this randomized clinical trial in the delivery unit of a University Hospital with 189 infants born between 35 and 42 weeks of gestation. Participants were randomly assigned to one of three groups: ICC, DCC, and cut-UCM. The primary outcomes measured were SpO2, HR, and PI at the 1st, 3rd, 5th, and 10th minutes after birth. We utilized ANOVA and Bayesian calculations in this study.

Results

There was no difference between the ICC, DCC, and cut-UCM groups in SpO2, HR, and PI values at the 1st, 3rd, 5th, and 10th minutes of life, which did not significantly alter between the three groups in one-way ANOVA. Bayesian repeated-measure ANOVA calculations showed that SpO2 and heart rate results at the 1st, 3rd, 5th, and 10th minutes did not differ between ICC, DCC, and cut-UCM techniques with strong evidence. At the 3rd minute, PI was slightly higher in the DCC and cut-UCM groups compared to the ICC group, with anecdotal evidence. We found no difference between DCC and cut-UCM regarding the 3rd-minute PI, with moderate evidence.

Conclusion

Umbilical clamping procedures (ICC, DCC, and cut-UCM) did not affect SpO2 and HR in the first ten minutes of life, but 3rd-minute PI values were slightly higher in DCC and cut-UCM compared with ICC among late preterm and term neonates.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Early human development
Early human development 医学-妇产科学
CiteScore
4.40
自引率
4.00%
发文量
100
审稿时长
46 days
期刊介绍: Established as an authoritative, highly cited voice on early human development, Early Human Development provides a unique opportunity for researchers and clinicians to bridge the communication gap between disciplines. Creating a forum for the productive exchange of ideas concerning early human growth and development, the journal publishes original research and clinical papers with particular emphasis on the continuum between fetal life and the perinatal period; aspects of postnatal growth influenced by early events; and the safeguarding of the quality of human survival. The first comprehensive and interdisciplinary journal in this area of growing importance, Early Human Development offers pertinent contributions to the following subject areas: Fetology; perinatology; pediatrics; growth and development; obstetrics; reproduction and fertility; epidemiology; behavioural sciences; nutrition and metabolism; teratology; neurology; brain biology; developmental psychology and screening.
期刊最新文献
Early pain findings in infants with brachial plexus birth injury: Relationship with function and comorbidities, and cut-off point for fractures Cardiac autonomic regulation as a proxy of early neurodevelopment: A systematic review Implementation of nutritional care bundle is associated with improved growth in preterm infants born before 32 gestational weeks Evaluation of normal and abnormal fetal renal microvascular flow characteristics of three-dimensional MV-flow imaging Validity and use of the Neonatal Infant Stressor Scale: An integrative review
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1