Brooke Liang , Jordan Mah , Malaya K. Sahoo , Benjamin A. Pinsky
{"title":"对免疫力低下患者支气管肺泡灌洗液进行 Epstein-Barr 病毒 qPCR 检测。","authors":"Brooke Liang , Jordan Mah , Malaya K. Sahoo , Benjamin A. Pinsky","doi":"10.1016/j.jcv.2024.105705","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Background</h3><p>Epstein-Barr Virus (EBV) is associated with lung disease in immunocompromised patients, particularly transplant recipients. EBV DNA testing of lower respiratory tract specimens may have diagnostic utility.</p></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><p>This was a retrospective, observational study of all patients with bronchoalveolar lavage (BAL) fluids submitted for EBV qPCR testing from February 2016 to June 2022 at the Stanford Clinical Virology Laboratory.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>There were 140 patients that underwent 251 EBV qPCR BAL tests (median 1; range 1 – 10). These patients had a mean age of 15.9 years (standard deviation, 15.1 years) and 50 % were female. Transplant recipients accounted for 67.1 % (94/140) of patients, including 67.0 % (63/94) solid organ transplant (SOT) and 33.0 % (31/94) hematopoietic cell transplant. Diagnostic testing was performed more commonly than surveillance testing [57.0 % (143/251) v. 43.0 % (108/251)]; 96.2 % (104/108) of surveillance samples were from lung transplant recipients. Excluding internal control failures, 34.7 % (83/239) of BAL had detectable EBV DNA, encompassing a wide range of viral loads (median=3.03 log<sub>10</sub> IU/mL, range 1.44 to 6.06). Overall agreement of EBV DNA in BAL compared to plasma was 74.1 % [117/158; 95 % confidence interval (CI): 66.5 % to 80.7 %], with a kappa coefficient of 0.44 (95 % CI: 0.30 to 0.57). Only 20.1 % (48/239) of results were discussed in a subsequent clinical note, and one result (0.4 %; 1/239) changed clinical management.</p></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><p>EBV qPCR testing on BAL offers limited clinical impact. Additional biomarkers are required to improve the diagnosis of EBV-associated lung diseases.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":15517,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Clinical Virology","volume":"174 ","pages":"Article 105705"},"PeriodicalIF":4.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-07-13","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Epstein-Barr virus qPCR testing on bronchoalveolar lavage fluid from immunocompromised patients\",\"authors\":\"Brooke Liang , Jordan Mah , Malaya K. Sahoo , Benjamin A. Pinsky\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.jcv.2024.105705\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><h3>Background</h3><p>Epstein-Barr Virus (EBV) is associated with lung disease in immunocompromised patients, particularly transplant recipients. EBV DNA testing of lower respiratory tract specimens may have diagnostic utility.</p></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><p>This was a retrospective, observational study of all patients with bronchoalveolar lavage (BAL) fluids submitted for EBV qPCR testing from February 2016 to June 2022 at the Stanford Clinical Virology Laboratory.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>There were 140 patients that underwent 251 EBV qPCR BAL tests (median 1; range 1 – 10). These patients had a mean age of 15.9 years (standard deviation, 15.1 years) and 50 % were female. Transplant recipients accounted for 67.1 % (94/140) of patients, including 67.0 % (63/94) solid organ transplant (SOT) and 33.0 % (31/94) hematopoietic cell transplant. Diagnostic testing was performed more commonly than surveillance testing [57.0 % (143/251) v. 43.0 % (108/251)]; 96.2 % (104/108) of surveillance samples were from lung transplant recipients. Excluding internal control failures, 34.7 % (83/239) of BAL had detectable EBV DNA, encompassing a wide range of viral loads (median=3.03 log<sub>10</sub> IU/mL, range 1.44 to 6.06). Overall agreement of EBV DNA in BAL compared to plasma was 74.1 % [117/158; 95 % confidence interval (CI): 66.5 % to 80.7 %], with a kappa coefficient of 0.44 (95 % CI: 0.30 to 0.57). Only 20.1 % (48/239) of results were discussed in a subsequent clinical note, and one result (0.4 %; 1/239) changed clinical management.</p></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><p>EBV qPCR testing on BAL offers limited clinical impact. Additional biomarkers are required to improve the diagnosis of EBV-associated lung diseases.</p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":15517,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Clinical Virology\",\"volume\":\"174 \",\"pages\":\"Article 105705\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":4.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-07-13\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Clinical Virology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1386653224000672\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"VIROLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Clinical Virology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1386653224000672","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"VIROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
Epstein-Barr virus qPCR testing on bronchoalveolar lavage fluid from immunocompromised patients
Background
Epstein-Barr Virus (EBV) is associated with lung disease in immunocompromised patients, particularly transplant recipients. EBV DNA testing of lower respiratory tract specimens may have diagnostic utility.
Methods
This was a retrospective, observational study of all patients with bronchoalveolar lavage (BAL) fluids submitted for EBV qPCR testing from February 2016 to June 2022 at the Stanford Clinical Virology Laboratory.
Results
There were 140 patients that underwent 251 EBV qPCR BAL tests (median 1; range 1 – 10). These patients had a mean age of 15.9 years (standard deviation, 15.1 years) and 50 % were female. Transplant recipients accounted for 67.1 % (94/140) of patients, including 67.0 % (63/94) solid organ transplant (SOT) and 33.0 % (31/94) hematopoietic cell transplant. Diagnostic testing was performed more commonly than surveillance testing [57.0 % (143/251) v. 43.0 % (108/251)]; 96.2 % (104/108) of surveillance samples were from lung transplant recipients. Excluding internal control failures, 34.7 % (83/239) of BAL had detectable EBV DNA, encompassing a wide range of viral loads (median=3.03 log10 IU/mL, range 1.44 to 6.06). Overall agreement of EBV DNA in BAL compared to plasma was 74.1 % [117/158; 95 % confidence interval (CI): 66.5 % to 80.7 %], with a kappa coefficient of 0.44 (95 % CI: 0.30 to 0.57). Only 20.1 % (48/239) of results were discussed in a subsequent clinical note, and one result (0.4 %; 1/239) changed clinical management.
Conclusions
EBV qPCR testing on BAL offers limited clinical impact. Additional biomarkers are required to improve the diagnosis of EBV-associated lung diseases.
期刊介绍:
The Journal of Clinical Virology, an esteemed international publication, serves as the official journal for both the Pan American Society for Clinical Virology and The European Society for Clinical Virology. Dedicated to advancing the understanding of human virology in clinical settings, the Journal of Clinical Virology focuses on disseminating research papers and reviews pertaining to the clinical aspects of virology. Its scope encompasses articles discussing diagnostic methodologies and virus-induced clinical conditions, with an emphasis on practicality and relevance to clinical practice.
The journal publishes on topics that include:
• new diagnostic technologies
• nucleic acid amplification and serologic testing
• targeted and metagenomic next-generation sequencing
• emerging pandemic viral threats
• respiratory viruses
• transplant viruses
• chronic viral infections
• cancer-associated viruses
• gastrointestinal viruses
• central nervous system viruses
• one health (excludes animal health)