口腔健康研究观察性研究和临床试验报告 OHStat 指南:解释和阐述》。

IF 3.1 2区 医学 Q1 DENTISTRY, ORAL SURGERY & MEDICINE Journal of the American Dental Association Pub Date : 2024-08-01 DOI:10.1016/j.adaj.2024.06.007
Al M. Best PhD, Thomas A. Lang MA, Barbara L. Greenberg PhD, John C. Gunsolley DDS, MS, Effie Ioannidou DDS, MDS, Task Force on Design and Analysis in Oral Health Research
{"title":"口腔健康研究观察性研究和临床试验报告 OHStat 指南:解释和阐述》。","authors":"Al M. Best PhD,&nbsp;Thomas A. Lang MA,&nbsp;Barbara L. Greenberg PhD,&nbsp;John C. Gunsolley DDS, MS,&nbsp;Effie Ioannidou DDS, MDS,&nbsp;Task Force on Design and Analysis in Oral Health Research","doi":"10.1016/j.adaj.2024.06.007","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>Adequate and transparent reporting is necessary for critically appraising research. Yet, evidence suggests that the design, conduct, analysis, interpretation, and reporting of oral health research could be greatly improved. Accordingly, the Task Force on Design and Analysis in Oral Health Research—statisticians and trialists from academia and industry—empaneled a group of authors to develop methodological and statistical reporting guidelines identifying the minimum information needed to document and evaluate observational studies and clinical trials in oral health: the OHstat Guidelines. Drafts were circulated to the editors of 85 oral health journals and to Task Force members and sponsors and discussed at a December 2020 workshop attended by 49 researchers. The final version was subsequently approved by the Task Force in September 2021, submitted for journal review in 2022, and revised in 2023. The checklist consists of 48 guidelines: 5 for introductory information, 17 for methods, 13 for statistical analysis, 6 for results, and 7 for interpretation; 7 are specific to clinical trials. Each of these guidelines identifies relevant information, explains its importance, and often describes best practices. The checklist was published in multiple journals. The article was published simultaneously in <em>JDR Clinical and Translational Research,</em> the <em>Journal of the American Dental Association,</em> and the <em>Journal of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery.</em> Completed checklists should accompany manuscripts submitted for publication to these and other oral health journals to help authors, journal editors, and reviewers verify that the manuscript provides the information necessary to adequately document and evaluate the research.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":17197,"journal":{"name":"Journal of the American Dental Association","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":3.1000,"publicationDate":"2024-08-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0002817724003167/pdfft?md5=d11239bacf0a6cf8096d15ec8e21098c&pid=1-s2.0-S0002817724003167-main.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"The OHStat Guidelines for Reporting Observational Studies and Clinical Trials in Oral Health Research: explanation and elaboration\",\"authors\":\"Al M. Best PhD,&nbsp;Thomas A. Lang MA,&nbsp;Barbara L. Greenberg PhD,&nbsp;John C. Gunsolley DDS, MS,&nbsp;Effie Ioannidou DDS, MDS,&nbsp;Task Force on Design and Analysis in Oral Health Research\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.adaj.2024.06.007\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><p>Adequate and transparent reporting is necessary for critically appraising research. Yet, evidence suggests that the design, conduct, analysis, interpretation, and reporting of oral health research could be greatly improved. Accordingly, the Task Force on Design and Analysis in Oral Health Research—statisticians and trialists from academia and industry—empaneled a group of authors to develop methodological and statistical reporting guidelines identifying the minimum information needed to document and evaluate observational studies and clinical trials in oral health: the OHstat Guidelines. Drafts were circulated to the editors of 85 oral health journals and to Task Force members and sponsors and discussed at a December 2020 workshop attended by 49 researchers. The final version was subsequently approved by the Task Force in September 2021, submitted for journal review in 2022, and revised in 2023. The checklist consists of 48 guidelines: 5 for introductory information, 17 for methods, 13 for statistical analysis, 6 for results, and 7 for interpretation; 7 are specific to clinical trials. Each of these guidelines identifies relevant information, explains its importance, and often describes best practices. The checklist was published in multiple journals. The article was published simultaneously in <em>JDR Clinical and Translational Research,</em> the <em>Journal of the American Dental Association,</em> and the <em>Journal of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery.</em> Completed checklists should accompany manuscripts submitted for publication to these and other oral health journals to help authors, journal editors, and reviewers verify that the manuscript provides the information necessary to adequately document and evaluate the research.</p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":17197,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of the American Dental Association\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.1000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-08-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0002817724003167/pdfft?md5=d11239bacf0a6cf8096d15ec8e21098c&pid=1-s2.0-S0002817724003167-main.pdf\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of the American Dental Association\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0002817724003167\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"DENTISTRY, ORAL SURGERY & MEDICINE\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of the American Dental Association","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0002817724003167","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"DENTISTRY, ORAL SURGERY & MEDICINE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

充分和透明的报告对于批判性地评估研究是必要的。然而,有证据表明,口腔健康研究的设计、实施、分析、解释和报告都可以大大改进。因此,口腔健康研究设计与分析工作组--来自学术界和工业界的统计学家和试验专家--召集了一批作者,制定了方法和统计报告指南,确定了记录和评估口腔健康观察性研究和临床试验所需的最低限度信息:OHstat 指南。草案已分发给 85 份口腔健康期刊的编辑以及特别工作组成员和赞助商,并在 2020 年 12 月的研讨会上进行了讨论,49 名研究人员参加了此次研讨会。随后,工作组于 2021 年 9 月批准了最终版本,于 2022 年提交期刊审阅,并于 2023 年进行了修订。核对表由 48 条指南组成:其中 5 条为介绍性信息,17 条为方法,13 条为统计分析,6 条为结果,7 条为解释;7 条是专门针对临床试验的。每项指南都确定了相关信息,解释了其重要性,通常还介绍了最佳实践。该核对表已在多种期刊上发表。文章同时发表在《JDR 临床与转化研究》、《美国牙科协会杂志》和《口腔颌面外科杂志》上。向这些期刊和其他口腔健康期刊投稿时,应随附填写完整的核对表,以帮助作者、期刊编辑和审稿人核实稿件是否提供了充分记录和评价研究的必要信息。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
The OHStat Guidelines for Reporting Observational Studies and Clinical Trials in Oral Health Research: explanation and elaboration

Adequate and transparent reporting is necessary for critically appraising research. Yet, evidence suggests that the design, conduct, analysis, interpretation, and reporting of oral health research could be greatly improved. Accordingly, the Task Force on Design and Analysis in Oral Health Research—statisticians and trialists from academia and industry—empaneled a group of authors to develop methodological and statistical reporting guidelines identifying the minimum information needed to document and evaluate observational studies and clinical trials in oral health: the OHstat Guidelines. Drafts were circulated to the editors of 85 oral health journals and to Task Force members and sponsors and discussed at a December 2020 workshop attended by 49 researchers. The final version was subsequently approved by the Task Force in September 2021, submitted for journal review in 2022, and revised in 2023. The checklist consists of 48 guidelines: 5 for introductory information, 17 for methods, 13 for statistical analysis, 6 for results, and 7 for interpretation; 7 are specific to clinical trials. Each of these guidelines identifies relevant information, explains its importance, and often describes best practices. The checklist was published in multiple journals. The article was published simultaneously in JDR Clinical and Translational Research, the Journal of the American Dental Association, and the Journal of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery. Completed checklists should accompany manuscripts submitted for publication to these and other oral health journals to help authors, journal editors, and reviewers verify that the manuscript provides the information necessary to adequately document and evaluate the research.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of the American Dental Association
Journal of the American Dental Association 医学-牙科与口腔外科
CiteScore
5.30
自引率
10.30%
发文量
221
审稿时长
34 days
期刊介绍: There is not a single source or solution to help dentists in their quest for lifelong learning, improving dental practice, and dental well-being. JADA+, along with The Journal of the American Dental Association, is striving to do just that, bringing together practical content covering dentistry topics and procedures to help dentists—both general dentists and specialists—provide better patient care and improve oral health and well-being. This is a work in progress; as we add more content, covering more topics of interest, it will continue to expand, becoming an ever-more essential source of oral health knowledge.
期刊最新文献
Maxillary radiolucency in a 54-year-old man. The effect of self-reported flossing behavior on cardiovascular disease events and mortality: Findings from the 2009-2016 National Health and Nutrition Examination Surveys. Fluid-filled blisters with background white striations. Motivational interviewing at home: A community trial to improve oral health literacy and reduce morbidity in disadvantaged Chilean families. Endodontic access with different computer navigation systems in calcified root canals.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1