Nicole M Wright, James P Applewhite, Amit G Reddy, Mohit Khera
{"title":"充气式阴茎假体异位储液器置入技术的进步。","authors":"Nicole M Wright, James P Applewhite, Amit G Reddy, Mohit Khera","doi":"10.1093/sxmrev/qeae046","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Traditional reservoir placement (RP) into the space of Retzius during three-piece inflatable penile prosthesis implantation has been associated with serious bladder, iliac vessel, and bowel complications, encouraging the development of \"ectopic\" RP methods.</p><p><strong>Objectives: </strong>In this study we sought to document an up-to-date, comprehensive analysis of ectopic RP techniques regarding both patient satisfaction and clinical complications.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A PubMed, Ovid MEDLINE, and Cochrane Library literature search of English language articles from 1966 to 2023 with keywords \"inflatable,\" \"penile prosthesis,\" \"reservoir,\" and \"placement\" gave 179 publications, 70 of which were included in a comprehensive chronology and investigation after review. Overall, 12 retrospective studies detailing 9 ectopic RP techniques were compared for discussion.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Sufficient data for comparison were found for 9 ectopic RP methods: posterior/anterior to transversalis fascia (PTF/ATF); high submuscular (HSM); HSM \"Five-Step\" technique (HSM-FST); lateral retroperitoneal (LR); sub-external oblique (SEO); direct vision, transfascial (DVT); low submuscular with transfascial fixation (LSM w/ TFF); and midline submuscular reservoir (MSMR). Although rare, serious complications have occurred with the use of ectopic RP techniques: 2 bladder perforations on implantation with PTF RP, a delayed bowel obstruction with HSM RP, and a colonic injury in a patient with a history of colon surgery with LR RP. Generally, herniation is the most relevant clinical complication in ectopic RP. At the time of this review there was no reported herniation with LR, SEO, LSM w/ TFF, or MSMR, likely due to fixation steps and/or reinforced spaces. Regarding patient satisfaction, HSM, HSM-FST, and LSM w/ TFF had similarly high rates of patient satisfaction while other techniques had no patient satisfaction data available. Importantly, reservoir palpability/visibility relates directly to patient satisfaction. Levels of palpability and/or visibility were reported in patients who underwent PTF/ATF, HSM, HSM-FST, SEO, and LSM w/ TFF, whereas no palpability was reported in patients who underwent LR, DVT, and MSMR.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Proper comparison of ectopic methods is not possible without standardized patient surveys, consistent complication reporting, and larger sample sizes, indicating the need for a large, prospective, multisurgeon trial.</p>","PeriodicalId":21813,"journal":{"name":"Sexual medicine reviews","volume":" ","pages":"770-781"},"PeriodicalIF":3.6000,"publicationDate":"2024-09-25","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Advancements in ectopic reservoir placement for inflatable penile prostheses.\",\"authors\":\"Nicole M Wright, James P Applewhite, Amit G Reddy, Mohit Khera\",\"doi\":\"10.1093/sxmrev/qeae046\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Traditional reservoir placement (RP) into the space of Retzius during three-piece inflatable penile prosthesis implantation has been associated with serious bladder, iliac vessel, and bowel complications, encouraging the development of \\\"ectopic\\\" RP methods.</p><p><strong>Objectives: </strong>In this study we sought to document an up-to-date, comprehensive analysis of ectopic RP techniques regarding both patient satisfaction and clinical complications.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A PubMed, Ovid MEDLINE, and Cochrane Library literature search of English language articles from 1966 to 2023 with keywords \\\"inflatable,\\\" \\\"penile prosthesis,\\\" \\\"reservoir,\\\" and \\\"placement\\\" gave 179 publications, 70 of which were included in a comprehensive chronology and investigation after review. Overall, 12 retrospective studies detailing 9 ectopic RP techniques were compared for discussion.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Sufficient data for comparison were found for 9 ectopic RP methods: posterior/anterior to transversalis fascia (PTF/ATF); high submuscular (HSM); HSM \\\"Five-Step\\\" technique (HSM-FST); lateral retroperitoneal (LR); sub-external oblique (SEO); direct vision, transfascial (DVT); low submuscular with transfascial fixation (LSM w/ TFF); and midline submuscular reservoir (MSMR). Although rare, serious complications have occurred with the use of ectopic RP techniques: 2 bladder perforations on implantation with PTF RP, a delayed bowel obstruction with HSM RP, and a colonic injury in a patient with a history of colon surgery with LR RP. Generally, herniation is the most relevant clinical complication in ectopic RP. At the time of this review there was no reported herniation with LR, SEO, LSM w/ TFF, or MSMR, likely due to fixation steps and/or reinforced spaces. Regarding patient satisfaction, HSM, HSM-FST, and LSM w/ TFF had similarly high rates of patient satisfaction while other techniques had no patient satisfaction data available. Importantly, reservoir palpability/visibility relates directly to patient satisfaction. Levels of palpability and/or visibility were reported in patients who underwent PTF/ATF, HSM, HSM-FST, SEO, and LSM w/ TFF, whereas no palpability was reported in patients who underwent LR, DVT, and MSMR.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Proper comparison of ectopic methods is not possible without standardized patient surveys, consistent complication reporting, and larger sample sizes, indicating the need for a large, prospective, multisurgeon trial.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":21813,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Sexual medicine reviews\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"770-781\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.6000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-09-25\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Sexual medicine reviews\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1093/sxmrev/qeae046\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"UROLOGY & NEPHROLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Sexual medicine reviews","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1093/sxmrev/qeae046","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"UROLOGY & NEPHROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
摘要
简介:在三件式充气阴茎假体植入过程中,传统的将贮藏器置入Retzius间隙(RP)的方法与严重的膀胱、髂血管和肠道并发症有关,因此鼓励了 "异位 "RP方法的发展:在本研究中,我们试图对异位阴茎假体植入技术的患者满意度和临床并发症进行最新的全面分析:以 "充气式"、"阴茎假体"、"贮水池 "和 "置入 "为关键词,对 PubMed、Ovid MEDLINE 和 Cochrane 图书馆中 1966 年至 2023 年的英文文献进行了检索,共检索到 179 篇文献,其中 70 篇在审查后被纳入综合年表和调查。总共有 12 项回顾性研究,详细介绍了 9 种异位 RP 技术,并进行了比较讨论:结果:9 种异位 RP 方法都有足够的数据可供比较:横筋膜后/前(PTF/ATF);高位肌下(HSM);HSM "五步 "技术(HSM-FST);侧腹膜后(LR);外斜下方(SEO);直视、筋膜外固定(DVT);低位肌下筋膜外固定(LSM w/ TFF);中线肌下贮器(MSMR)。异位 RP 技术虽然罕见,但也出现过严重的并发症:PTF RP 植入时出现两次膀胱穿孔,HSM RP 出现一次延迟性肠梗阻,LR RP 出现过结肠手术史患者的结肠损伤。一般来说,疝气是异位 RP 最常见的临床并发症。在本次回顾中,没有关于 LR、SEO、LSM w/ TFF 或 MSMR 发生疝气的报道,这可能是由于固定步骤和/或加固空间的缘故。在患者满意度方面,HSM、HSM-FST 和 LSM w/ TFF 的患者满意度同样很高,而其他技术则没有患者满意度数据。重要的是,储层的可触及性/可视性与患者满意度直接相关。接受 PTF/ATF、HSM、HSM-FST、SEO 和 LSM w/ TFF 治疗的患者均报告了可触及性和/或可视性水平,而接受 LR、DVT 和 MSMR 治疗的患者则未报告可触及性:结论:如果没有标准化的患者调查、一致的并发症报告和更大的样本量,就不可能对异位方法进行适当的比较,这表明需要进行大型、前瞻性、多外科医师试验。
Advancements in ectopic reservoir placement for inflatable penile prostheses.
Introduction: Traditional reservoir placement (RP) into the space of Retzius during three-piece inflatable penile prosthesis implantation has been associated with serious bladder, iliac vessel, and bowel complications, encouraging the development of "ectopic" RP methods.
Objectives: In this study we sought to document an up-to-date, comprehensive analysis of ectopic RP techniques regarding both patient satisfaction and clinical complications.
Methods: A PubMed, Ovid MEDLINE, and Cochrane Library literature search of English language articles from 1966 to 2023 with keywords "inflatable," "penile prosthesis," "reservoir," and "placement" gave 179 publications, 70 of which were included in a comprehensive chronology and investigation after review. Overall, 12 retrospective studies detailing 9 ectopic RP techniques were compared for discussion.
Results: Sufficient data for comparison were found for 9 ectopic RP methods: posterior/anterior to transversalis fascia (PTF/ATF); high submuscular (HSM); HSM "Five-Step" technique (HSM-FST); lateral retroperitoneal (LR); sub-external oblique (SEO); direct vision, transfascial (DVT); low submuscular with transfascial fixation (LSM w/ TFF); and midline submuscular reservoir (MSMR). Although rare, serious complications have occurred with the use of ectopic RP techniques: 2 bladder perforations on implantation with PTF RP, a delayed bowel obstruction with HSM RP, and a colonic injury in a patient with a history of colon surgery with LR RP. Generally, herniation is the most relevant clinical complication in ectopic RP. At the time of this review there was no reported herniation with LR, SEO, LSM w/ TFF, or MSMR, likely due to fixation steps and/or reinforced spaces. Regarding patient satisfaction, HSM, HSM-FST, and LSM w/ TFF had similarly high rates of patient satisfaction while other techniques had no patient satisfaction data available. Importantly, reservoir palpability/visibility relates directly to patient satisfaction. Levels of palpability and/or visibility were reported in patients who underwent PTF/ATF, HSM, HSM-FST, SEO, and LSM w/ TFF, whereas no palpability was reported in patients who underwent LR, DVT, and MSMR.
Conclusion: Proper comparison of ectopic methods is not possible without standardized patient surveys, consistent complication reporting, and larger sample sizes, indicating the need for a large, prospective, multisurgeon trial.