近距离放射治疗和体外放射治疗原发性阴茎癌--器官保存的游戏规则改变者?

IF 9.6 1区 医学 Q1 ONCOLOGY Cancer treatment reviews Pub Date : 2024-07-10 DOI:10.1016/j.ctrv.2024.102800
Radion Garaz , Cristian Mirvald , Philippe E. Spiess , G. Daniel Grass , Anita Thomas , Cristian Surcel , Igor Tsaur
{"title":"近距离放射治疗和体外放射治疗原发性阴茎癌--器官保存的游戏规则改变者?","authors":"Radion Garaz ,&nbsp;Cristian Mirvald ,&nbsp;Philippe E. Spiess ,&nbsp;G. Daniel Grass ,&nbsp;Anita Thomas ,&nbsp;Cristian Surcel ,&nbsp;Igor Tsaur","doi":"10.1016/j.ctrv.2024.102800","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Objective</h3><p>In squamous cell carcinoma of the penis (PeCa), treatment options for primary tumors vary by disease stage and may include surgery, radiation, topical chemotherapy, or laser excision. This review aims to highlight the current evidence on the value of radiotherapy as an organ-preserving strategy in primary PeCa.</p></div><div><h3>Material and Methods</h3><p>Manuscripts on primary PeCa treatment with external beam radiotherapy (EBRT) and brachytherapy were evaluated via Scopus, PubMed/MEDLINE, and Web of Science<sup>TM</sup> (2013–2023) to assess their efficacy and safety. Animal studies, studies with &lt;5 patients, and case reports were excluded.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>Radiotherapy offers the potential for organ preservation with tumor control rates comparable to radical surgery, while disease-specific survival rates up to 70 % were experienced with EBRT. Brachytherapy (BT) is the preferred method of irradiation for glans-limited tumors, whereas a higher relapse risk is expected for tumors &gt;4 cm. BT shows 73 % amputation-free survival at 8–10 years and 81 % progression-free survival at 5–10 years. Compared with BT, total amputation significantly improves 5-year disease-free survival rate. BT offers a superior 5-year local control and penile preservation rates compared to EBRT. Common acute toxicities of brachytherapy include radiodermatitis, sterile urethritis, and urethral adhesions. The primary late adverse events of BT are soft tissue necrosis (0–31 %) and meatal stenosis (0–43 %).</p></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><p>BT is a favorable radiation modality, offering an efficient and conservative approach. HDR BT is favored for its enhanced dose distribution and radiation protection. Collaboration between radiation oncologists and urologists is essential in order to provide an optimal patient selection and manage toxicities thus optimizing patient outcomes.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":9537,"journal":{"name":"Cancer treatment reviews","volume":"129 ","pages":"Article 102800"},"PeriodicalIF":9.6000,"publicationDate":"2024-07-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Brachytherapy and external beam radiation in the management of primary penile cancer – Game changer for organ preservation?\",\"authors\":\"Radion Garaz ,&nbsp;Cristian Mirvald ,&nbsp;Philippe E. Spiess ,&nbsp;G. Daniel Grass ,&nbsp;Anita Thomas ,&nbsp;Cristian Surcel ,&nbsp;Igor Tsaur\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.ctrv.2024.102800\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><h3>Objective</h3><p>In squamous cell carcinoma of the penis (PeCa), treatment options for primary tumors vary by disease stage and may include surgery, radiation, topical chemotherapy, or laser excision. This review aims to highlight the current evidence on the value of radiotherapy as an organ-preserving strategy in primary PeCa.</p></div><div><h3>Material and Methods</h3><p>Manuscripts on primary PeCa treatment with external beam radiotherapy (EBRT) and brachytherapy were evaluated via Scopus, PubMed/MEDLINE, and Web of Science<sup>TM</sup> (2013–2023) to assess their efficacy and safety. Animal studies, studies with &lt;5 patients, and case reports were excluded.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>Radiotherapy offers the potential for organ preservation with tumor control rates comparable to radical surgery, while disease-specific survival rates up to 70 % were experienced with EBRT. Brachytherapy (BT) is the preferred method of irradiation for glans-limited tumors, whereas a higher relapse risk is expected for tumors &gt;4 cm. BT shows 73 % amputation-free survival at 8–10 years and 81 % progression-free survival at 5–10 years. Compared with BT, total amputation significantly improves 5-year disease-free survival rate. BT offers a superior 5-year local control and penile preservation rates compared to EBRT. Common acute toxicities of brachytherapy include radiodermatitis, sterile urethritis, and urethral adhesions. The primary late adverse events of BT are soft tissue necrosis (0–31 %) and meatal stenosis (0–43 %).</p></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><p>BT is a favorable radiation modality, offering an efficient and conservative approach. HDR BT is favored for its enhanced dose distribution and radiation protection. Collaboration between radiation oncologists and urologists is essential in order to provide an optimal patient selection and manage toxicities thus optimizing patient outcomes.</p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":9537,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Cancer treatment reviews\",\"volume\":\"129 \",\"pages\":\"Article 102800\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":9.6000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-07-10\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Cancer treatment reviews\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0305737224001282\",\"RegionNum\":1,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"ONCOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Cancer treatment reviews","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0305737224001282","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ONCOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的:对于阴茎鳞状细胞癌(PeCa),原发肿瘤的治疗方案因疾病分期而异,可能包括手术、放疗、局部化疗或激光切除。本综述旨在强调放疗作为原发性PeCa器官保留策略的价值的现有证据:通过Scopus、PubMed/MEDLINE和Web of ScienceTM(2013-2023年)对采用体外放射治疗(EBRT)和近距离放疗治疗原发性PeCa的文章进行评估,以评估其有效性和安全性。动物研究、研究结果:放疗可保留器官,肿瘤控制率与根治性手术相当,而 EBRT 的疾病特异性生存率高达 70%。近距离放射治疗(BT)是治疗龟头局限性肿瘤的首选方法,而大于 4 厘米的肿瘤复发风险较高。BT 8-10 年的无截肢生存率为 73%,5-10 年的无进展生存率为 81%。与 BT 相比,全截肢能显著提高 5 年无病生存率。与 EBRT 相比,BT 的 5 年局部控制率和阴茎保留率更高。近距离放射治疗的常见急性毒性包括放射性皮炎、无菌性尿道炎和尿道粘连。近距离放射治疗的主要晚期不良反应是软组织坏死(0-31%)和肉阜狭窄(0-43%):结论:BT 是一种良好的放射方式,提供了一种高效、保守的方法。结论:BT 是一种良好的放射方式,提供了一种高效、保守的方法。HDR BT 因其增强的剂量分布和辐射防护而受到青睐。放射肿瘤学家和泌尿科医生之间的合作至关重要,这样才能为患者提供最佳选择并控制毒性,从而优化患者的治疗效果。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Brachytherapy and external beam radiation in the management of primary penile cancer – Game changer for organ preservation?

Objective

In squamous cell carcinoma of the penis (PeCa), treatment options for primary tumors vary by disease stage and may include surgery, radiation, topical chemotherapy, or laser excision. This review aims to highlight the current evidence on the value of radiotherapy as an organ-preserving strategy in primary PeCa.

Material and Methods

Manuscripts on primary PeCa treatment with external beam radiotherapy (EBRT) and brachytherapy were evaluated via Scopus, PubMed/MEDLINE, and Web of ScienceTM (2013–2023) to assess their efficacy and safety. Animal studies, studies with <5 patients, and case reports were excluded.

Results

Radiotherapy offers the potential for organ preservation with tumor control rates comparable to radical surgery, while disease-specific survival rates up to 70 % were experienced with EBRT. Brachytherapy (BT) is the preferred method of irradiation for glans-limited tumors, whereas a higher relapse risk is expected for tumors >4 cm. BT shows 73 % amputation-free survival at 8–10 years and 81 % progression-free survival at 5–10 years. Compared with BT, total amputation significantly improves 5-year disease-free survival rate. BT offers a superior 5-year local control and penile preservation rates compared to EBRT. Common acute toxicities of brachytherapy include radiodermatitis, sterile urethritis, and urethral adhesions. The primary late adverse events of BT are soft tissue necrosis (0–31 %) and meatal stenosis (0–43 %).

Conclusion

BT is a favorable radiation modality, offering an efficient and conservative approach. HDR BT is favored for its enhanced dose distribution and radiation protection. Collaboration between radiation oncologists and urologists is essential in order to provide an optimal patient selection and manage toxicities thus optimizing patient outcomes.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Cancer treatment reviews
Cancer treatment reviews 医学-肿瘤学
CiteScore
21.40
自引率
0.80%
发文量
109
审稿时长
13 days
期刊介绍: Cancer Treatment Reviews Journal Overview: International journal focused on developments in cancer treatment research Publishes state-of-the-art, authoritative reviews to keep clinicians and researchers informed Regular Sections in Each Issue: Comments on Controversy Tumor Reviews Anti-tumor Treatments New Drugs Complications of Treatment General and Supportive Care Laboratory/Clinic Interface Submission and Editorial System: Online submission and editorial system for Cancer Treatment Reviews
期刊最新文献
Editorial Board Expert recommendations on treatment sequencing and challenging clinical scenarios in human epidermal growth factor receptor 2-positive (HER2-positive) metastatic breast cancer Estrogen Signaling in Early-Stage Breast Cancer: Impact on Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy and Immunotherapy Optimizing outcomes and personalizing care with targeted agents in advanced cholangiocarcinoma PARP inhibitors in gliomas: Mechanisms of action, current trends and future perspectives
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1