{"title":"财政整顿与收入不平等:评估证据","authors":"Panagiotis Th. Konstantinou","doi":"10.1016/j.qref.2024.101880","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>What are the effects of fiscal austerity on income inequality? In this paper I estimate the average treatment effect (<span><math><mi>ATE</mi></math></span>) of fiscal consolidations quantifying their dynamic impact by means of dose–response functions. Dose–response functions allow the <span><math><mi>ATE</mi></math></span>s to vary by the levels of treatment. I find that austerity indeed increases income inequality, however the increases manifest themselves whenever unannounced fiscal measures are relatively low, lower that 0.20% of GDP or relatively high, higher than 2.17% of GDP. For intermediate levels of fiscal measures income inequality does not change. These results hold for various measures of income inequality.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":2,"journal":{"name":"ACS Applied Bio Materials","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":4.6000,"publicationDate":"2024-06-25","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Fiscal consolidations and income inequality: Evaluating the evidence\",\"authors\":\"Panagiotis Th. Konstantinou\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.qref.2024.101880\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><p>What are the effects of fiscal austerity on income inequality? In this paper I estimate the average treatment effect (<span><math><mi>ATE</mi></math></span>) of fiscal consolidations quantifying their dynamic impact by means of dose–response functions. Dose–response functions allow the <span><math><mi>ATE</mi></math></span>s to vary by the levels of treatment. I find that austerity indeed increases income inequality, however the increases manifest themselves whenever unannounced fiscal measures are relatively low, lower that 0.20% of GDP or relatively high, higher than 2.17% of GDP. For intermediate levels of fiscal measures income inequality does not change. These results hold for various measures of income inequality.</p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":2,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"ACS Applied Bio Materials\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":4.6000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-06-25\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"ACS Applied Bio Materials\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"96\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1062976924000863\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"MATERIALS SCIENCE, BIOMATERIALS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"ACS Applied Bio Materials","FirstCategoryId":"96","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1062976924000863","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"MATERIALS SCIENCE, BIOMATERIALS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
摘要
财政紧缩对收入不平等有何影响?在本文中,我估算了财政整顿的平均治疗效果(ATE),并通过剂量反应函数量化了其动态影响。剂量-反应函数允许 ATE 因治疗水平而异。我发现,紧缩政策确实会加剧收入不平等,但只要未公布的财政措施相对较低,低于 GDP 的 0.20%,或相对较高,高于 GDP 的 2.17%,收入不平等就会加剧。对于中等水平的财政措施,收入不平等并没有改变。这些结果适用于不同的收入不平等衡量标准。
Fiscal consolidations and income inequality: Evaluating the evidence
What are the effects of fiscal austerity on income inequality? In this paper I estimate the average treatment effect () of fiscal consolidations quantifying their dynamic impact by means of dose–response functions. Dose–response functions allow the s to vary by the levels of treatment. I find that austerity indeed increases income inequality, however the increases manifest themselves whenever unannounced fiscal measures are relatively low, lower that 0.20% of GDP or relatively high, higher than 2.17% of GDP. For intermediate levels of fiscal measures income inequality does not change. These results hold for various measures of income inequality.