雌雄实验鼠的糖精厌恶学习

IF 1.7 4区 心理学 Q3 PSYCHOLOGY, BIOLOGICAL Learning and Motivation Pub Date : 2024-07-14 DOI:10.1016/j.lmot.2024.102019
Sadahiko Nakajima , Mengwei Li
{"title":"雌雄实验鼠的糖精厌恶学习","authors":"Sadahiko Nakajima ,&nbsp;Mengwei Li","doi":"10.1016/j.lmot.2024.102019","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>The three experiments reported in the present research demonstrated that male rats acquire stronger saccharin aversion than females. Experiment 1 revealed that male rats were better than females in a single-trial saccharin aversion learning with a lithium chloride injection as the unconditioned stimulus (US), when normalizing saccharin intake data. Experiment 2 replicated this finding. The stronger saccharin aversion learning in male rats was also observed in Experiment 3 with wheel running as the US, assessed by the saccharin-vs.-water choice test conducted after six saccharin-running pairing days. Experiments 2 and 3 also showed that the magnitude of induced nausea, reflected in the kaolin clay ingestion, is equivalent between the sexes. Experiment 4 excluded the possibility that the observed sex difference in saccharin aversion is due to the sex difference in inherent saccharin preference. These results, taken together, suggest that potential factors of the sex difference in rats' conditioned taste aversion could include sex disparities in taste perception, the ability to associate taste with nausea, and/or the expression of association learning.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":47305,"journal":{"name":"Learning and Motivation","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.7000,"publicationDate":"2024-07-14","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Saccharin aversion learning in male and female laboratory rats\",\"authors\":\"Sadahiko Nakajima ,&nbsp;Mengwei Li\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.lmot.2024.102019\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><p>The three experiments reported in the present research demonstrated that male rats acquire stronger saccharin aversion than females. Experiment 1 revealed that male rats were better than females in a single-trial saccharin aversion learning with a lithium chloride injection as the unconditioned stimulus (US), when normalizing saccharin intake data. Experiment 2 replicated this finding. The stronger saccharin aversion learning in male rats was also observed in Experiment 3 with wheel running as the US, assessed by the saccharin-vs.-water choice test conducted after six saccharin-running pairing days. Experiments 2 and 3 also showed that the magnitude of induced nausea, reflected in the kaolin clay ingestion, is equivalent between the sexes. Experiment 4 excluded the possibility that the observed sex difference in saccharin aversion is due to the sex difference in inherent saccharin preference. These results, taken together, suggest that potential factors of the sex difference in rats' conditioned taste aversion could include sex disparities in taste perception, the ability to associate taste with nausea, and/or the expression of association learning.</p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":47305,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Learning and Motivation\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.7000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-07-14\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Learning and Motivation\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"102\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0023969024000614\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"心理学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"PSYCHOLOGY, BIOLOGICAL\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Learning and Motivation","FirstCategoryId":"102","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0023969024000614","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"PSYCHOLOGY, BIOLOGICAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

本研究报告中的三项实验表明,雄性大鼠比雌性大鼠获得更强的糖精厌恶感。实验 1 发现,在对糖精摄入数据进行归一化处理时,雄性大鼠在以氯化锂注射为非条件刺激(US)的单次糖精厌恶学习中表现优于雌性大鼠。实验 2 复制了这一发现。在实验 3 中,雄性大鼠也观察到了更强的糖精厌恶学习,该实验以车轮跑步作为无条件刺激,通过在六天糖精-跑步配对后进行的糖精-水选择测试来评估。实验 2 和 3 还表明,摄入高岭土所反映的诱导恶心程度在两性之间是相同的。实验 4 排除了观察到的糖精厌恶的性别差异是由于固有糖精偏好的性别差异造成的可能性。这些结果表明,造成大鼠条件性味觉厌恶的性别差异的潜在因素可能包括味觉感知的性别差异、将味觉与恶心联系起来的能力和/或联想学习的表现。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Saccharin aversion learning in male and female laboratory rats

The three experiments reported in the present research demonstrated that male rats acquire stronger saccharin aversion than females. Experiment 1 revealed that male rats were better than females in a single-trial saccharin aversion learning with a lithium chloride injection as the unconditioned stimulus (US), when normalizing saccharin intake data. Experiment 2 replicated this finding. The stronger saccharin aversion learning in male rats was also observed in Experiment 3 with wheel running as the US, assessed by the saccharin-vs.-water choice test conducted after six saccharin-running pairing days. Experiments 2 and 3 also showed that the magnitude of induced nausea, reflected in the kaolin clay ingestion, is equivalent between the sexes. Experiment 4 excluded the possibility that the observed sex difference in saccharin aversion is due to the sex difference in inherent saccharin preference. These results, taken together, suggest that potential factors of the sex difference in rats' conditioned taste aversion could include sex disparities in taste perception, the ability to associate taste with nausea, and/or the expression of association learning.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
2.90
自引率
0.00%
发文量
53
期刊介绍: Learning and Motivation features original experimental research devoted to the analysis of basic phenomena and mechanisms of learning, memory, and motivation. These studies, involving either animal or human subjects, examine behavioral, biological, and evolutionary influences on the learning and motivation processes, and often report on an integrated series of experiments that advance knowledge in this field. Theoretical papers and shorter reports are also considered.
期刊最新文献
Degraded contingency effect on running-based flavor aversion in rats: Testing the associative cue-competition account with flavors of minimal similarity Examining the role of classroom climate and teacher-student relationships in EFL students’ perceived learning outcomes: A self-determination theory perspective Effect of Raha syrup on the motivational effects of morphine and CSF serotonin levels in rats The mediating role of self-efficacy between high school students’ perceived teacher support and mathematics feedback literacy Metacognitive training for algebra teaching to high school students: An action research study
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1