遭遇妊娠失败后的健康和社会环境:从男性视角出发的基础理论研究

IF 2.6 3区 医学 Q1 NURSING Midwifery Pub Date : 2024-07-08 DOI:10.1016/j.midw.2024.104107
Sara Fernández-Basanta, Carmen Coronado, María-Jesús Movilla-Fernández
{"title":"遭遇妊娠失败后的健康和社会环境:从男性视角出发的基础理论研究","authors":"Sara Fernández-Basanta,&nbsp;Carmen Coronado,&nbsp;María-Jesús Movilla-Fernández","doi":"10.1016/j.midw.2024.104107","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Aim</h3><p>To develop an empirical model that explores and explains the social process of the encounters of men who suffered pregnancy loss with health and social environments.</p></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><p>A constructivist grounded theory method was performed, whereby 23 couples were interviewed using a semi-structured interview. Men that suffered pregnancy loss were analysed iteratively, with line-by-line and incident-to-incident coding, focused coding and axial coding, until data saturation and the emergence of theory.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>The theory <em>Behind bars that hide and mask them</em> illustrates the social process of the encounters of men who suffered pregnancy loss with the health and social environment. Social taboo and gender stereotypes could repress, marginalize, and hide men's feelings. This transposed into the healthcare setting, which focused on the physical aspects of the woman, and lacked an emotional approach, follow-up, and sensitivity. Men reported a lack of recognition or family and social support.</p></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><p>Many men report not feeling involved in the care process after pregnancy loss, in addition to the prioritisation of medicalised care, which can be explained by a medical paternalism approach. These results provide a basis to reflect and plan the inclusion of men for the provision of comprehensive and couple-centred care.</p></div><div><h3>Implications for practice</h3><p>Communication strategies and emotional management, self-reflection of health professionals, theoretical-practical content with a gender perspective in the training of nurses and midwives, involvement of the organisation and leadership, and further research is required.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":18495,"journal":{"name":"Midwifery","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":2.6000,"publicationDate":"2024-07-08","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0266613824001906/pdfft?md5=1767d1c18eeb8f113331ffd8c8be1a4a&pid=1-s2.0-S0266613824001906-main.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Encountering the health and social environment after a pregnancy loss: A grounded theory study from male perspective\",\"authors\":\"Sara Fernández-Basanta,&nbsp;Carmen Coronado,&nbsp;María-Jesús Movilla-Fernández\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.midw.2024.104107\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><h3>Aim</h3><p>To develop an empirical model that explores and explains the social process of the encounters of men who suffered pregnancy loss with health and social environments.</p></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><p>A constructivist grounded theory method was performed, whereby 23 couples were interviewed using a semi-structured interview. Men that suffered pregnancy loss were analysed iteratively, with line-by-line and incident-to-incident coding, focused coding and axial coding, until data saturation and the emergence of theory.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>The theory <em>Behind bars that hide and mask them</em> illustrates the social process of the encounters of men who suffered pregnancy loss with the health and social environment. Social taboo and gender stereotypes could repress, marginalize, and hide men's feelings. This transposed into the healthcare setting, which focused on the physical aspects of the woman, and lacked an emotional approach, follow-up, and sensitivity. Men reported a lack of recognition or family and social support.</p></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><p>Many men report not feeling involved in the care process after pregnancy loss, in addition to the prioritisation of medicalised care, which can be explained by a medical paternalism approach. These results provide a basis to reflect and plan the inclusion of men for the provision of comprehensive and couple-centred care.</p></div><div><h3>Implications for practice</h3><p>Communication strategies and emotional management, self-reflection of health professionals, theoretical-practical content with a gender perspective in the training of nurses and midwives, involvement of the organisation and leadership, and further research is required.</p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":18495,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Midwifery\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.6000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-07-08\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0266613824001906/pdfft?md5=1767d1c18eeb8f113331ffd8c8be1a4a&pid=1-s2.0-S0266613824001906-main.pdf\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Midwifery\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0266613824001906\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"NURSING\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Midwifery","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0266613824001906","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"NURSING","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

方法 采用建构主义基础理论方法,通过半结构化访谈对 23 对夫妇进行访谈。结果 "隐藏和掩盖他们的铁窗背后 "这一理论说明了遭受妊娠损失的男性与健康和社会环境相遇的社会过程。社会禁忌和性别刻板印象会压抑、边缘化和隐藏男性的情感。这种情况也反映到医疗环境中,医疗环境只关注妇女的身体状况,而缺乏情感关怀、跟踪和敏感性。结论许多男性表示,他们在失去妊娠后感觉不到自己参与了护理过程,此外,他们还认为医疗护理是优先事项,这可以用医学家长式的方法来解释。这些结果为反思和计划将男性纳入提供全面的、以夫妇为中心的护理提供了依据。对实践的启示沟通策略和情绪管理、医疗专业人员的自我反思、护士和助产士培训中性别视角的理论-实践内容、组织和领导层的参与以及进一步的研究都是必需的。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Encountering the health and social environment after a pregnancy loss: A grounded theory study from male perspective

Aim

To develop an empirical model that explores and explains the social process of the encounters of men who suffered pregnancy loss with health and social environments.

Methods

A constructivist grounded theory method was performed, whereby 23 couples were interviewed using a semi-structured interview. Men that suffered pregnancy loss were analysed iteratively, with line-by-line and incident-to-incident coding, focused coding and axial coding, until data saturation and the emergence of theory.

Results

The theory Behind bars that hide and mask them illustrates the social process of the encounters of men who suffered pregnancy loss with the health and social environment. Social taboo and gender stereotypes could repress, marginalize, and hide men's feelings. This transposed into the healthcare setting, which focused on the physical aspects of the woman, and lacked an emotional approach, follow-up, and sensitivity. Men reported a lack of recognition or family and social support.

Conclusion

Many men report not feeling involved in the care process after pregnancy loss, in addition to the prioritisation of medicalised care, which can be explained by a medical paternalism approach. These results provide a basis to reflect and plan the inclusion of men for the provision of comprehensive and couple-centred care.

Implications for practice

Communication strategies and emotional management, self-reflection of health professionals, theoretical-practical content with a gender perspective in the training of nurses and midwives, involvement of the organisation and leadership, and further research is required.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Midwifery
Midwifery 医学-护理
CiteScore
4.50
自引率
7.40%
发文量
221
审稿时长
13.4 weeks
期刊介绍: Midwifery publishes the latest peer reviewed international research to inform the safety, quality, outcomes and experiences of pregnancy, birth and maternity care for childbearing women, their babies and families. The journal’s publications support midwives and maternity care providers to explore and develop their knowledge, skills and attitudes informed by best available evidence. Midwifery provides an international, interdisciplinary forum for the publication, dissemination and discussion of advances in evidence, controversies and current research, and promotes continuing education through publication of systematic and other scholarly reviews and updates. Midwifery articles cover the cultural, clinical, psycho-social, sociological, epidemiological, education, managerial, workforce, organizational and technological areas of practice in preconception, maternal and infant care. The journal welcomes the highest quality scholarly research that employs rigorous methodology. Midwifery is a leading international journal in midwifery and maternal health with a current impact factor of 1.861 (© Thomson Reuters Journal Citation Reports 2016) and employs a double-blind peer review process.
期刊最新文献
Maternal experiences and preference of maternity services in Singapore: A descriptive qualitative study. Breastfeeding self-efficacy in mothers: The body image and emotional intelligence perspective Perspectives of health care providers on obstetric point-of-care ultrasound in lower-level health facilities in Kenya. Clinical decision-making during childbirth in health facilities from the perspectives of labouring women, relatives, and health care providers: A scoping review. Perceived stress and prenatal depression symptoms among couples with gestational diabetes mellitus: The mediating role of dyadic coping
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1