膝关节多韧带损伤中的半月板损伤

IF 1.1 4区 医学 Q3 ORTHOPEDICS Indian Journal of Orthopaedics Pub Date : 2024-07-11 DOI:10.1007/s43465-024-01217-0
David Figueroa, María Loreto Figueroa, Martin Cañas, Alexandra Feuereisen, Francisco Figueroa
{"title":"膝关节多韧带损伤中的半月板损伤","authors":"David Figueroa, María Loreto Figueroa, Martin Cañas, Alexandra Feuereisen, Francisco Figueroa","doi":"10.1007/s43465-024-01217-0","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<h3 data-test=\"abstract-sub-heading\">Introduction</h3><p>Multi-ligament knee injuries (MLKIs) are rare and complex knee lesions and are potentially associated with intra-articular injuries, especially meniscal tears. Understanding the meniscal tear patterns involved in MLKI can help the orthopedic surgeon treat these complex injuries.</p><h3 data-test=\"abstract-sub-heading\">Objective</h3><p>The purpose of this study was to describe the incidence, classification, and treatment of meniscal injuries in a cohort of patients with MLKIs and carry out an updated review of the evidence available.</p><h3 data-test=\"abstract-sub-heading\">Materials and methods</h3><p>Descriptive retrospective study. Patients with a history of reconstructive surgery for MLKI performed between 2013 and 2023 were included. Informed consent was obtained from all patients included in the study. Patient demographics, magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) study, and operative reports were reviewed. Groups were then formed based on ligament injury patterns. Meniscal tears were identified by MRI and through diagnostic arthroscopy for each patient. The association between meniscal lesions and injury patterns was calculated through Fisher’s exact test. Agreement between the presence of meniscal tear on MRI and in diagnostic arthroscopy was measured using the kappa test. The sensitivity and specificity of MRI were calculated. We inferred the presence of a meniscal tear by injury pattern using the Agresti-Coull confidence interval. For the statistical analysis, a significance of 5% and a confidence interval of 95% were considered.</p><h3 data-test=\"abstract-sub-heading\">Results</h3><p>Seventy patients with MLKIs were included, with a mean age of 30.69 years (SD 10.65). Forty-seven patients had meniscal lesions (67.1%). Of them, 6 had only medial meniscus tears, 31 had only lateral meniscus tears, and 10 had lesions of both menisci, comprising 57 meniscal lesions in total. An anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) + medial collateral ligament/posteromedial corner (MCL/PMC) was the most common injury pattern (52.86% of all patients). Of these 37 patients, 78.38% had meniscal injuries, and most of them (68.97%) were only lateral meniscus injuries. The odds ratio (OR) of having a meniscal tear when having an ACL + medial-side injury was 4.83 (95% CI; 0.89–26.17). Patients with ACL + lateral-side injury pattern had meniscal tears in 42.86%. The lateral meniscus was involved in 100% of these patients. 62.5% of medial meniscus injuries were treated by meniscal repair, and 37.5% by partial meniscectomy. 58.54% of lateral meniscus injuries were treated by meniscal repair, and 39.02% by partial meniscectomy. Agreement calculated using the kappa test between MRI and diagnostic arthroscopy for medial meniscal lesions was 78.57%, and for lateral meniscal lesions was 84.29%.</p><h3 data-test=\"abstract-sub-heading\">Conclusion</h3><p>The ligament injury pattern and the side of the injured collateral ligament influenced the incidence and laterality of meniscal damage. ACL + medial-side injuries were shown to have significantly greater meniscal damage compared to other injury patterns. It is crucial to have a high index of suspicion, obtain a high-quality MRI, and arthroscopically evaluate any possible meniscal lesions in MLKIs.</p>","PeriodicalId":13338,"journal":{"name":"Indian Journal of Orthopaedics","volume":"13 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.1000,"publicationDate":"2024-07-11","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Meniscal Lesions in Multi-Ligament Knee Injuries\",\"authors\":\"David Figueroa, María Loreto Figueroa, Martin Cañas, Alexandra Feuereisen, Francisco Figueroa\",\"doi\":\"10.1007/s43465-024-01217-0\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<h3 data-test=\\\"abstract-sub-heading\\\">Introduction</h3><p>Multi-ligament knee injuries (MLKIs) are rare and complex knee lesions and are potentially associated with intra-articular injuries, especially meniscal tears. Understanding the meniscal tear patterns involved in MLKI can help the orthopedic surgeon treat these complex injuries.</p><h3 data-test=\\\"abstract-sub-heading\\\">Objective</h3><p>The purpose of this study was to describe the incidence, classification, and treatment of meniscal injuries in a cohort of patients with MLKIs and carry out an updated review of the evidence available.</p><h3 data-test=\\\"abstract-sub-heading\\\">Materials and methods</h3><p>Descriptive retrospective study. Patients with a history of reconstructive surgery for MLKI performed between 2013 and 2023 were included. Informed consent was obtained from all patients included in the study. Patient demographics, magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) study, and operative reports were reviewed. Groups were then formed based on ligament injury patterns. Meniscal tears were identified by MRI and through diagnostic arthroscopy for each patient. The association between meniscal lesions and injury patterns was calculated through Fisher’s exact test. Agreement between the presence of meniscal tear on MRI and in diagnostic arthroscopy was measured using the kappa test. The sensitivity and specificity of MRI were calculated. We inferred the presence of a meniscal tear by injury pattern using the Agresti-Coull confidence interval. For the statistical analysis, a significance of 5% and a confidence interval of 95% were considered.</p><h3 data-test=\\\"abstract-sub-heading\\\">Results</h3><p>Seventy patients with MLKIs were included, with a mean age of 30.69 years (SD 10.65). Forty-seven patients had meniscal lesions (67.1%). Of them, 6 had only medial meniscus tears, 31 had only lateral meniscus tears, and 10 had lesions of both menisci, comprising 57 meniscal lesions in total. An anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) + medial collateral ligament/posteromedial corner (MCL/PMC) was the most common injury pattern (52.86% of all patients). Of these 37 patients, 78.38% had meniscal injuries, and most of them (68.97%) were only lateral meniscus injuries. The odds ratio (OR) of having a meniscal tear when having an ACL + medial-side injury was 4.83 (95% CI; 0.89–26.17). Patients with ACL + lateral-side injury pattern had meniscal tears in 42.86%. The lateral meniscus was involved in 100% of these patients. 62.5% of medial meniscus injuries were treated by meniscal repair, and 37.5% by partial meniscectomy. 58.54% of lateral meniscus injuries were treated by meniscal repair, and 39.02% by partial meniscectomy. Agreement calculated using the kappa test between MRI and diagnostic arthroscopy for medial meniscal lesions was 78.57%, and for lateral meniscal lesions was 84.29%.</p><h3 data-test=\\\"abstract-sub-heading\\\">Conclusion</h3><p>The ligament injury pattern and the side of the injured collateral ligament influenced the incidence and laterality of meniscal damage. ACL + medial-side injuries were shown to have significantly greater meniscal damage compared to other injury patterns. It is crucial to have a high index of suspicion, obtain a high-quality MRI, and arthroscopically evaluate any possible meniscal lesions in MLKIs.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":13338,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Indian Journal of Orthopaedics\",\"volume\":\"13 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.1000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-07-11\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Indian Journal of Orthopaedics\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1007/s43465-024-01217-0\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"ORTHOPEDICS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Indian Journal of Orthopaedics","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s43465-024-01217-0","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"ORTHOPEDICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

导言多韧带膝关节损伤(MLKI)是一种罕见的复杂膝关节病变,可能与关节内损伤有关,尤其是半月板撕裂。本研究旨在描述一组多韧带膝关节损伤患者半月板损伤的发生率、分类和治疗方法,并对现有证据进行最新回顾。研究纳入了 2013 年至 2023 年间接受过 MLKI 重建手术的患者。所有纳入研究的患者均已知情同意。研究人员审查了患者的人口统计学资料、磁共振成像(MRI)研究和手术报告。然后根据韧带损伤模式进行分组。通过核磁共振成像和关节镜诊断确定每位患者的半月板撕裂情况。半月板损伤与损伤模式之间的关联通过费雪精确检验进行计算。核磁共振成像与诊断性关节镜检查是否存在半月板撕裂之间的一致性采用卡帕检验进行测量。计算了核磁共振成像的敏感性和特异性。我们使用 Agresti-Coull 置信区间法根据损伤模式推断是否存在半月板撕裂。统计分析的显著性为 5%,置信区间为 95%。结果共纳入 70 例 MLKI 患者,平均年龄为 30.69 岁(标清 10.65)。47名患者有半月板病变(67.1%)。其中,6 名患者只有内侧半月板撕裂,31 名患者只有外侧半月板撕裂,10 名患者两个半月板都有损伤,总共有 57 例半月板损伤。前交叉韧带(ACL)+内侧副韧带/后内角(MCL/PMC)是最常见的损伤模式(占所有患者的 52.86%)。在这 37 名患者中,78.38% 有半月板损伤,其中大部分(68.97%)仅为外侧半月板损伤。前交叉韧带+内侧损伤的半月板撕裂几率比(OR)为4.83(95% CI;0.89-26.17)。前交叉韧带+外侧损伤的患者中有42.86%出现半月板撕裂。这些患者中100%涉及外侧半月板。62.5%的内侧半月板损伤患者接受了半月板修复术,37.5%接受了半月板部分切除术。58.54%的外侧半月板损伤采用半月板修复术,39.02%采用半月板部分切除术。结论 韧带损伤模式和受伤侧的副韧带影响半月板损伤的发生率和侧向性。与其他损伤模式相比,前交叉韧带+内侧损伤的半月板损伤率明显更高。对MLKIs进行高度怀疑、获得高质量的磁共振成像并在关节镜下评估任何可能的半月板损伤至关重要。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

摘要图片

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Meniscal Lesions in Multi-Ligament Knee Injuries

Introduction

Multi-ligament knee injuries (MLKIs) are rare and complex knee lesions and are potentially associated with intra-articular injuries, especially meniscal tears. Understanding the meniscal tear patterns involved in MLKI can help the orthopedic surgeon treat these complex injuries.

Objective

The purpose of this study was to describe the incidence, classification, and treatment of meniscal injuries in a cohort of patients with MLKIs and carry out an updated review of the evidence available.

Materials and methods

Descriptive retrospective study. Patients with a history of reconstructive surgery for MLKI performed between 2013 and 2023 were included. Informed consent was obtained from all patients included in the study. Patient demographics, magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) study, and operative reports were reviewed. Groups were then formed based on ligament injury patterns. Meniscal tears were identified by MRI and through diagnostic arthroscopy for each patient. The association between meniscal lesions and injury patterns was calculated through Fisher’s exact test. Agreement between the presence of meniscal tear on MRI and in diagnostic arthroscopy was measured using the kappa test. The sensitivity and specificity of MRI were calculated. We inferred the presence of a meniscal tear by injury pattern using the Agresti-Coull confidence interval. For the statistical analysis, a significance of 5% and a confidence interval of 95% were considered.

Results

Seventy patients with MLKIs were included, with a mean age of 30.69 years (SD 10.65). Forty-seven patients had meniscal lesions (67.1%). Of them, 6 had only medial meniscus tears, 31 had only lateral meniscus tears, and 10 had lesions of both menisci, comprising 57 meniscal lesions in total. An anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) + medial collateral ligament/posteromedial corner (MCL/PMC) was the most common injury pattern (52.86% of all patients). Of these 37 patients, 78.38% had meniscal injuries, and most of them (68.97%) were only lateral meniscus injuries. The odds ratio (OR) of having a meniscal tear when having an ACL + medial-side injury was 4.83 (95% CI; 0.89–26.17). Patients with ACL + lateral-side injury pattern had meniscal tears in 42.86%. The lateral meniscus was involved in 100% of these patients. 62.5% of medial meniscus injuries were treated by meniscal repair, and 37.5% by partial meniscectomy. 58.54% of lateral meniscus injuries were treated by meniscal repair, and 39.02% by partial meniscectomy. Agreement calculated using the kappa test between MRI and diagnostic arthroscopy for medial meniscal lesions was 78.57%, and for lateral meniscal lesions was 84.29%.

Conclusion

The ligament injury pattern and the side of the injured collateral ligament influenced the incidence and laterality of meniscal damage. ACL + medial-side injuries were shown to have significantly greater meniscal damage compared to other injury patterns. It is crucial to have a high index of suspicion, obtain a high-quality MRI, and arthroscopically evaluate any possible meniscal lesions in MLKIs.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
1.80
自引率
0.00%
发文量
185
审稿时长
9 months
期刊介绍: IJO welcomes articles that contribute to Orthopaedic knowledge from India and overseas. We publish articles dealing with clinical orthopaedics and basic research in orthopaedic surgery. Articles are accepted only for exclusive publication in the Indian Journal of Orthopaedics. Previously published articles, articles which are in peer-reviewed electronic publications in other journals, are not accepted by the Journal. Published articles and illustrations become the property of the Journal. The copyright remains with the journal. Studies must be carried out in accordance with World Medical Association Declaration of Helsinki.
期刊最新文献
Technology Update in Management of Multi-Ligament Knee Injuries. From the Guest Editors: Unraveling the Complexities of Multiligament Knee Injuries-A Global Endeavor. Strategies for Preventing Tunnel Convergence in Multiligament Knee Injury Reconstructions. Adjustable Loop Fixation in Multi-ligament Knee Injuries: A Technical Note. Clinical Results of Isolated MCL Grade III Injury in Acute and Chronic Setting: Systematic Review and Meta-analysis.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1