签到间隔对痴呆症患者积极参与的影响

IF 1.1 4区 心理学 Q3 PSYCHOLOGY, CLINICAL Behavioral Interventions Pub Date : 2024-07-11 DOI:10.1002/bin.2040
Ebonee Hodder, Javier Virúes‐Ortega, Sarah Taylor, Katrina J. Phillips, Rebecca A. Sharp
{"title":"签到间隔对痴呆症患者积极参与的影响","authors":"Ebonee Hodder, Javier Virúes‐Ortega, Sarah Taylor, Katrina J. Phillips, Rebecca A. Sharp","doi":"10.1002/bin.2040","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Social isolation and a lack of engagement in activities are common among people with dementia living in residential care. The check‐in procedure, in which staff approach a resident to offer a choice of activities and praise engagement every 15 min, is effective in increasing engagement. However, the schedule effects of the check‐in procedure have not been previously evaluated. We assessed whether the check‐in procedure was effective with an extended check‐in interval of 30 min. We found that the procedure remained effective with a leaner schedule and that engagement persisted above baseline levels between check‐in interactions. Staff reported that the intent to increase engagement was valuable and that the procedure was easy to implement. We discuss our findings in the context of participatory interventions for dementia and the potential role of organizational factors in the adoption of evidence‐based procedures in dementia care.","PeriodicalId":47138,"journal":{"name":"Behavioral Interventions","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.1000,"publicationDate":"2024-07-11","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Effects of check‐in interval on active engagement in people with dementia\",\"authors\":\"Ebonee Hodder, Javier Virúes‐Ortega, Sarah Taylor, Katrina J. Phillips, Rebecca A. Sharp\",\"doi\":\"10.1002/bin.2040\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Social isolation and a lack of engagement in activities are common among people with dementia living in residential care. The check‐in procedure, in which staff approach a resident to offer a choice of activities and praise engagement every 15 min, is effective in increasing engagement. However, the schedule effects of the check‐in procedure have not been previously evaluated. We assessed whether the check‐in procedure was effective with an extended check‐in interval of 30 min. We found that the procedure remained effective with a leaner schedule and that engagement persisted above baseline levels between check‐in interactions. Staff reported that the intent to increase engagement was valuable and that the procedure was easy to implement. We discuss our findings in the context of participatory interventions for dementia and the potential role of organizational factors in the adoption of evidence‐based procedures in dementia care.\",\"PeriodicalId\":47138,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Behavioral Interventions\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.1000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-07-11\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Behavioral Interventions\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"102\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1002/bin.2040\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"心理学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"PSYCHOLOGY, CLINICAL\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Behavioral Interventions","FirstCategoryId":"102","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1002/bin.2040","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"PSYCHOLOGY, CLINICAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

居住在养老院的痴呆症患者普遍存在社交孤立和缺乏活动参与的问题。签到程序是指工作人员每隔 15 分钟就会走近一名住客,为其提供活动选择并表扬参与活动的住客,该程序能有效提高住客的参与度。然而,此前尚未对签到程序的日程效果进行过评估。我们评估了延长签到间隔 30 分钟后签到程序是否有效。我们发现,在更紧凑的时间安排下,签到程序依然有效,而且在两次签到互动之间,参与度持续高于基线水平。工作人员表示,提高参与度的意图很有价值,而且该程序很容易实施。我们将结合痴呆症的参与式干预以及组织因素在痴呆症护理中采用循证程序的潜在作用来讨论我们的研究结果。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Effects of check‐in interval on active engagement in people with dementia
Social isolation and a lack of engagement in activities are common among people with dementia living in residential care. The check‐in procedure, in which staff approach a resident to offer a choice of activities and praise engagement every 15 min, is effective in increasing engagement. However, the schedule effects of the check‐in procedure have not been previously evaluated. We assessed whether the check‐in procedure was effective with an extended check‐in interval of 30 min. We found that the procedure remained effective with a leaner schedule and that engagement persisted above baseline levels between check‐in interactions. Staff reported that the intent to increase engagement was valuable and that the procedure was easy to implement. We discuss our findings in the context of participatory interventions for dementia and the potential role of organizational factors in the adoption of evidence‐based procedures in dementia care.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Behavioral Interventions
Behavioral Interventions PSYCHOLOGY, CLINICAL-
CiteScore
1.50
自引率
20.00%
发文量
66
期刊介绍: Behavioral Interventions aims to report research and practice involving the utilization of behavioral techniques in the treatment, education, assessment and training of students, clients or patients, as well as training techniques used with staff. Behavioral Interventions publishes: (1) research articles, (2) brief reports (a short report of an innovative technique or intervention that may be less rigorous than a research report), (3) topical literature reviews and discussion articles, (4) book reviews.
期刊最新文献
Evaluating video feedback to improve eSports performance in Street Fighter V Discrepancies between treatment preference and effectiveness Effects of an online group‐based intervention on effort tolerance in general education Further analysis of fixed‐lean approaches to reinforcement schedule thinning Token economies: Evidence‐based recommendations for practitioners
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1