公平享用公共服务设施

IF 0.8 4区 管理学 Q4 OPERATIONS RESEARCH & MANAGEMENT SCIENCE Operations Research Letters Pub Date : 2024-07-01 DOI:10.1016/j.orl.2024.107141
Sheng Liu , Nooshin Salari
{"title":"公平享用公共服务设施","authors":"Sheng Liu ,&nbsp;Nooshin Salari","doi":"10.1016/j.orl.2024.107141","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>Our paper studies a fair stochastic facility location problem with congestion under the max-min principle. We analyze the price of fairness in a two-location problem and develop a tractable optimization framework for the general multi-location setting. Evaluating the fair solution against the utilitarian solution on Buffalo's demographic data reveals that implementing a fair solution can substantially improve fairness measures (up to 98%) with relatively limited impact on the overall service quality.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":54682,"journal":{"name":"Operations Research Letters","volume":"55 ","pages":"Article 107141"},"PeriodicalIF":0.8000,"publicationDate":"2024-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Fairness in accessibility of public service facilities\",\"authors\":\"Sheng Liu ,&nbsp;Nooshin Salari\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.orl.2024.107141\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><p>Our paper studies a fair stochastic facility location problem with congestion under the max-min principle. We analyze the price of fairness in a two-location problem and develop a tractable optimization framework for the general multi-location setting. Evaluating the fair solution against the utilitarian solution on Buffalo's demographic data reveals that implementing a fair solution can substantially improve fairness measures (up to 98%) with relatively limited impact on the overall service quality.</p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":54682,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Operations Research Letters\",\"volume\":\"55 \",\"pages\":\"Article 107141\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.8000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-07-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Operations Research Letters\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"91\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0167637724000774\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"管理学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"OPERATIONS RESEARCH & MANAGEMENT SCIENCE\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Operations Research Letters","FirstCategoryId":"91","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0167637724000774","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"管理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"OPERATIONS RESEARCH & MANAGEMENT SCIENCE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

我们的论文研究了在最大最小原则下有拥堵的公平随机设施位置问题。我们分析了两地问题中的公平代价,并为一般多地问题制定了可操作的优化框架。根据水牛城的人口数据,将公平解决方案与功利解决方案进行对比评估,结果表明,实施公平解决方案可大幅提高公平性(高达 98%),而对整体服务质量的影响相对有限。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Fairness in accessibility of public service facilities

Our paper studies a fair stochastic facility location problem with congestion under the max-min principle. We analyze the price of fairness in a two-location problem and develop a tractable optimization framework for the general multi-location setting. Evaluating the fair solution against the utilitarian solution on Buffalo's demographic data reveals that implementing a fair solution can substantially improve fairness measures (up to 98%) with relatively limited impact on the overall service quality.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Operations Research Letters
Operations Research Letters 管理科学-运筹学与管理科学
CiteScore
2.10
自引率
9.10%
发文量
111
审稿时长
83 days
期刊介绍: Operations Research Letters is committed to the rapid review and fast publication of short articles on all aspects of operations research and analytics. Apart from a limitation to eight journal pages, quality, originality, relevance and clarity are the only criteria for selecting the papers to be published. ORL covers the broad field of optimization, stochastic models and game theory. Specific areas of interest include networks, routing, location, queueing, scheduling, inventory, reliability, and financial engineering. We wish to explore interfaces with other fields such as life sciences and health care, artificial intelligence and machine learning, energy distribution, and computational social sciences and humanities. Our traditional strength is in methodology, including theory, modelling, algorithms and computational studies. We also welcome novel applications and concise literature reviews.
期刊最新文献
Break maximization for round-robin tournaments without consecutive breaks Anchored rescheduling problem with non-availability periods On BASTA for discrete-time queues Assessing the accuracy of externalities prediction in a LCFS-PR M/G/1 queue under partial information Optimal strategies and values for monotone and classical mean-variance preferences coincide when asset prices are continuous
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1