评估化石燃料发电中的气候变化减缓技术对水资源可持续性的不良影响

IF 3.5 4区 环境科学与生态学 Q3 ENGINEERING, ENVIRONMENTAL Environmental Science: Water Research & Technology Pub Date : 2024-07-12 DOI:10.1039/D4EW00122B
Prebantha Moodley, Kevin Harding and Thomas A. Adams
{"title":"评估化石燃料发电中的气候变化减缓技术对水资源可持续性的不良影响","authors":"Prebantha Moodley, Kevin Harding and Thomas A. Adams","doi":"10.1039/D4EW00122B","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p >This work investigates the water impact of carbon capture technologies employed in coal and natural gas power generation, <em>viz.</em> the integrated gasification combined cycle, oxy-fuel combustion, solid oxide fuel cells and solvent-based post-combustion. The water impact per CO<small><sub>2</sub></small> avoided (WICa) metric was developed to understand the tradeoff between water usage and global warming potential, and additionally as a decision-making tool. It relates the impact on available water resources to greenhouse gas reduction over the cradle-to-plant-exit lifecycle by leveraging existing metrics, including the water impact index (WII), water withdrawal, water consumption, water quality, and water scarcity index (WSI). The results show that some carbon capture technologies increase the overall water usage of power generation plants, thereby increasing the water impact per CO<small><sub>2</sub></small> avoided. Solid oxide fuel cells and oxy-fuel technology, though not mature in comparison with post-combustion capture, have the least water impact per CO<small><sub>2</sub></small> avoided. Furthermore, water withdrawal and consumption are shown to trend with the WII in specific scenarios, implying that, in the absence of water quality and WSI data, the metric's use as a stakeholder decision-making tool remains. The potential to reduce global warming <em>via</em> carbon capture technologies in the power generation industry can create additional water resource challenges for countries if not carefully considered.</p>","PeriodicalId":75,"journal":{"name":"Environmental Science: Water Research & Technology","volume":" 10","pages":" 2509-2532"},"PeriodicalIF":3.5000,"publicationDate":"2024-07-12","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Assessing the undesired impacts on water sustainability from climate change mitigation technologies in fossil-based power generation†\",\"authors\":\"Prebantha Moodley, Kevin Harding and Thomas A. Adams\",\"doi\":\"10.1039/D4EW00122B\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p >This work investigates the water impact of carbon capture technologies employed in coal and natural gas power generation, <em>viz.</em> the integrated gasification combined cycle, oxy-fuel combustion, solid oxide fuel cells and solvent-based post-combustion. The water impact per CO<small><sub>2</sub></small> avoided (WICa) metric was developed to understand the tradeoff between water usage and global warming potential, and additionally as a decision-making tool. It relates the impact on available water resources to greenhouse gas reduction over the cradle-to-plant-exit lifecycle by leveraging existing metrics, including the water impact index (WII), water withdrawal, water consumption, water quality, and water scarcity index (WSI). The results show that some carbon capture technologies increase the overall water usage of power generation plants, thereby increasing the water impact per CO<small><sub>2</sub></small> avoided. Solid oxide fuel cells and oxy-fuel technology, though not mature in comparison with post-combustion capture, have the least water impact per CO<small><sub>2</sub></small> avoided. Furthermore, water withdrawal and consumption are shown to trend with the WII in specific scenarios, implying that, in the absence of water quality and WSI data, the metric's use as a stakeholder decision-making tool remains. The potential to reduce global warming <em>via</em> carbon capture technologies in the power generation industry can create additional water resource challenges for countries if not carefully considered.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":75,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Environmental Science: Water Research & Technology\",\"volume\":\" 10\",\"pages\":\" 2509-2532\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.5000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-07-12\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Environmental Science: Water Research & Technology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"93\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://pubs.rsc.org/en/content/articlelanding/2024/ew/d4ew00122b\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"环境科学与生态学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"ENGINEERING, ENVIRONMENTAL\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Environmental Science: Water Research & Technology","FirstCategoryId":"93","ListUrlMain":"https://pubs.rsc.org/en/content/articlelanding/2024/ew/d4ew00122b","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"环境科学与生态学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"ENGINEERING, ENVIRONMENTAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

这项研究调查了煤炭和天然气发电中采用的碳捕集技术对水的影响,即综合气化联合循环、富氧燃烧、固体氧化物燃料电池和燃烧后溶剂型。为了解用水量与全球升温潜能值之间的权衡,以及作为决策工具,开发了每避免 CO2 对水的影响(WICa)指标。该指标利用现有指标,包括水影响指数(WII)、取水量、耗水量、水质和缺水指数(WSI),将对可用水资源的影响与在从摇篮到工厂到退出的生命周期内减少温室气体排放联系起来。结果表明,一些碳捕集技术会增加发电厂的总体用水量,从而增加了每避免 1 吨二氧化碳对水的影响。与后燃烧技术相比,固体氧化物燃料电池和全氧燃烧技术虽然并不成熟,但每避免 1 CO2 对水的影响最小。此外,在特定情景下,取水量和耗水量与 WII 呈趋势,这意味着在缺乏水质和 WSI 数据的情况下,该指标仍可用作利益相关者的决策工具。如果不仔细考虑发电行业通过碳捕集技术减少全球变暖的潜力,可能会给各国带来额外的水资源挑战。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

摘要图片

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Assessing the undesired impacts on water sustainability from climate change mitigation technologies in fossil-based power generation†

This work investigates the water impact of carbon capture technologies employed in coal and natural gas power generation, viz. the integrated gasification combined cycle, oxy-fuel combustion, solid oxide fuel cells and solvent-based post-combustion. The water impact per CO2 avoided (WICa) metric was developed to understand the tradeoff between water usage and global warming potential, and additionally as a decision-making tool. It relates the impact on available water resources to greenhouse gas reduction over the cradle-to-plant-exit lifecycle by leveraging existing metrics, including the water impact index (WII), water withdrawal, water consumption, water quality, and water scarcity index (WSI). The results show that some carbon capture technologies increase the overall water usage of power generation plants, thereby increasing the water impact per CO2 avoided. Solid oxide fuel cells and oxy-fuel technology, though not mature in comparison with post-combustion capture, have the least water impact per CO2 avoided. Furthermore, water withdrawal and consumption are shown to trend with the WII in specific scenarios, implying that, in the absence of water quality and WSI data, the metric's use as a stakeholder decision-making tool remains. The potential to reduce global warming via carbon capture technologies in the power generation industry can create additional water resource challenges for countries if not carefully considered.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Environmental Science: Water Research & Technology
Environmental Science: Water Research & Technology ENGINEERING, ENVIRONMENTALENVIRONMENTAL SC-ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES
CiteScore
8.60
自引率
4.00%
发文量
206
期刊介绍: Environmental Science: Water Research & Technology seeks to showcase high quality research about fundamental science, innovative technologies, and management practices that promote sustainable water.
期刊最新文献
Back cover A machine learning framework to predict PPCP removal through various wastewater and water reuse treatment trains. Wastewater surveillance for public health: Quo Vadis? Back cover Assessment and application of GeneXpert rapid testing for respiratory viruses in school wastewater†
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1