因子 VIII 水平和 ISTH DIC 评分并不能区分 DIC 和肝病凝血病。

IF 1.7 4区 医学 Q3 HEMATOLOGY Acta Haematologica Pub Date : 2024-07-16 DOI:10.1159/000540239
Cecily Allen, Marina Heskel, Ayesha Butt, Christopher Tormey, Alexander B Pine, Alfred I Lee, Samir Gautam
{"title":"因子 VIII 水平和 ISTH DIC 评分并不能区分 DIC 和肝病凝血病。","authors":"Cecily Allen, Marina Heskel, Ayesha Butt, Christopher Tormey, Alexander B Pine, Alfred I Lee, Samir Gautam","doi":"10.1159/000540239","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Distinguishing disseminated intravascular coagulation (DIC) from the coagulopathy of liver disease represents a common clinical challenge. Here, we evaluated the utility of two diagnostic tools frequently used to differentiate between these conditions: factor VIII (FVIII) levels and the International Society on Thrombosis and Hemostasis (ISTH) DIC score.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>To this end, we conducted a retrospective chart review of patients with DIC, liver disease, or both. Multiple logistic regression was performed, and receiver operating characteristic curves were generated to calculate the area under curve (AUC) for distinguishing DIC in the setting of liver disease.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Among 123 patients with DIC, liver disease, or liver disease plus DIC, FVIII levels did not differ significantly. ISTH scores were lower in patients with DIC than in liver disease with or without DIC. Addition of several laboratory parameters to the ISTH score, including mean platelet volume, FV, FVIII, international normalized ratio, and activated partial thromboplastin time, improved AUC for distinguishing DIC in liver disease from liver disease alone (AUC = 0.76; p &lt; 0.0001).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>We conclude that FVIII levels do not distinguish DIC from liver disease, and ISTH DIC scores are not predictive of DIC in patients with liver disease. Inclusion of additional lab variables within the ISTH DIC score may aid in identifying DIC in patients with liver disease.</p>","PeriodicalId":6981,"journal":{"name":"Acta Haematologica","volume":" ","pages":"1-5"},"PeriodicalIF":1.7000,"publicationDate":"2024-07-16","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Factor VIII Levels and ISTH Disseminated Intravascular Coagulation Scores Do Not Distinguish Disseminated Intravascular Coagulation from the Coagulopathy of Liver Disease.\",\"authors\":\"Cecily Allen, Marina Heskel, Ayesha Butt, Christopher Tormey, Alexander B Pine, Alfred I Lee, Samir Gautam\",\"doi\":\"10.1159/000540239\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Distinguishing disseminated intravascular coagulation (DIC) from the coagulopathy of liver disease represents a common clinical challenge. Here, we evaluated the utility of two diagnostic tools frequently used to differentiate between these conditions: factor VIII (FVIII) levels and the International Society on Thrombosis and Hemostasis (ISTH) DIC score.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>To this end, we conducted a retrospective chart review of patients with DIC, liver disease, or both. Multiple logistic regression was performed, and receiver operating characteristic curves were generated to calculate the area under curve (AUC) for distinguishing DIC in the setting of liver disease.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Among 123 patients with DIC, liver disease, or liver disease plus DIC, FVIII levels did not differ significantly. ISTH scores were lower in patients with DIC than in liver disease with or without DIC. Addition of several laboratory parameters to the ISTH score, including mean platelet volume, FV, FVIII, international normalized ratio, and activated partial thromboplastin time, improved AUC for distinguishing DIC in liver disease from liver disease alone (AUC = 0.76; p &lt; 0.0001).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>We conclude that FVIII levels do not distinguish DIC from liver disease, and ISTH DIC scores are not predictive of DIC in patients with liver disease. Inclusion of additional lab variables within the ISTH DIC score may aid in identifying DIC in patients with liver disease.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":6981,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Acta Haematologica\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"1-5\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.7000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-07-16\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Acta Haematologica\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1159/000540239\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"HEMATOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Acta Haematologica","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1159/000540239","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"HEMATOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

导言:将 DIC 与肝病凝血病区分开来是一项常见的临床挑战。在此,我们评估了两种常用于区分这两种疾病的诊断工具的临床实用性:因子 VIII (FVIII) 水平和 ISTH DIC 评分:为此,我们对患有 DIC、肝病或同时患有这两种疾病的患者进行了回顾性病历审查。结果:在 123 例 DIC 患者中,肝脏疾病患者的血凝素(FVIII)水平最高,而肝脏疾病患者的血凝素(FVIII)水平最低:结果:在 123 名 DIC、肝病或肝病加 DIC 患者中,FVIII 水平没有显著差异。DIC 患者的 ISTH 评分低于伴有或不伴有 DIC 的肝病患者。在 ISTH DIC 评分中加入一些实验室参数,包括 MPV、FV、FVIII、INR 和 PTT,可提高区分肝病 DIC 和单纯肝病 DIC 的 AUC(AUC = 0.76;P < 0.0001):我们得出结论:FVIII水平不能区分DIC和肝病,ISTH DIC评分也不能预测肝病患者的DIC。在 ISTH DIC 评分中加入其他实验室变量可能有助于鉴别肝病患者的 DIC。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Factor VIII Levels and ISTH Disseminated Intravascular Coagulation Scores Do Not Distinguish Disseminated Intravascular Coagulation from the Coagulopathy of Liver Disease.

Introduction: Distinguishing disseminated intravascular coagulation (DIC) from the coagulopathy of liver disease represents a common clinical challenge. Here, we evaluated the utility of two diagnostic tools frequently used to differentiate between these conditions: factor VIII (FVIII) levels and the International Society on Thrombosis and Hemostasis (ISTH) DIC score.

Methods: To this end, we conducted a retrospective chart review of patients with DIC, liver disease, or both. Multiple logistic regression was performed, and receiver operating characteristic curves were generated to calculate the area under curve (AUC) for distinguishing DIC in the setting of liver disease.

Results: Among 123 patients with DIC, liver disease, or liver disease plus DIC, FVIII levels did not differ significantly. ISTH scores were lower in patients with DIC than in liver disease with or without DIC. Addition of several laboratory parameters to the ISTH score, including mean platelet volume, FV, FVIII, international normalized ratio, and activated partial thromboplastin time, improved AUC for distinguishing DIC in liver disease from liver disease alone (AUC = 0.76; p < 0.0001).

Conclusion: We conclude that FVIII levels do not distinguish DIC from liver disease, and ISTH DIC scores are not predictive of DIC in patients with liver disease. Inclusion of additional lab variables within the ISTH DIC score may aid in identifying DIC in patients with liver disease.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Acta Haematologica
Acta Haematologica 医学-血液学
CiteScore
4.90
自引率
0.00%
发文量
61
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: ''Acta Haematologica'' is a well-established and internationally recognized clinically-oriented journal featuring balanced, wide-ranging coverage of current hematology research. A wealth of information on such problems as anemia, leukemia, lymphoma, multiple myeloma, hereditary disorders, blood coagulation, growth factors, hematopoiesis and differentiation is contained in first-rate basic and clinical papers some of which are accompanied by editorial comments by eminent experts. These are supplemented by short state-of-the-art communications, reviews and correspondence as well as occasional special issues devoted to ‘hot topics’ in hematology. These will keep the practicing hematologist well informed of the new developments in the field.
期刊最新文献
Shorter duration of Blinatumomab administration to 14 days has same efficacy and safety profile in treatment of relapsed/refractory B-cell precursor acute lymphoblastic leukemia: A retrospective single-center study. Thiamine-Responsive Megaloblastic Anemia Syndrome Mimicking Myelodysplastic Neoplasm. Efficacy of haploidentical allogeneic hematopoietic cell transplantation following two courses of venetoclax and azacytidine therapy in patients over 55 years old with acute myelogenous leukemia. Real-World Use of Ruxolitinib in Patients with Myelofibrosis and Anemia or Thrombocytopenia at Diagnosis. Sudden Blast Crisis in a chronic myeloid leukemia patient in Treatment Free Remission: A case report and literature review.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1