对 YouTube® 上有关多发性硬化症患者神经康复的视频进行内容、教育价值和质量分析。

IF 0.8 4区 医学 Q4 CLINICAL NEUROLOGY Revista de neurologia Pub Date : 2024-08-01 DOI:10.33588/rn.7903.2024091
R Cano-de-la-Cuerda, S Marcos-Antón, A Blázquez-Fernández, M Fernández-Cañas, P Sánchez-Herrera Baeza, P Fernández-González, S Collado-Vázquez, C Jiménez-Antona, S Laguarta-Val
{"title":"对 YouTube® 上有关多发性硬化症患者神经康复的视频进行内容、教育价值和质量分析。","authors":"R Cano-de-la-Cuerda, S Marcos-Antón, A Blázquez-Fernández, M Fernández-Cañas, P Sánchez-Herrera Baeza, P Fernández-González, S Collado-Vázquez, C Jiménez-Antona, S Laguarta-Val","doi":"10.33588/rn.7903.2024091","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>The use of YouTube® has spread among patients with chronic diseases such as multiple sclerosis (MS). These patients consult the available videos to learn more about their disease in terms of diagnosis and making decisions about treatments, including rehabilitation. The aim of this study was to evaluate the content, educational value, and quality analysis of MS videos about neurorehabilitation on YouTube® using quantitative instruments.</p><p><strong>Materials and methods: </strong>A search was conducted on YouTube®. The first 30 videos that met the inclusion criteria were reviewed. The videos were classified according to the upload source and the content. All videos included in the review were assessed by the DISCERN questionnaire, the JAMA benchmark, the global quality scale (GQS) and the video information and quality index (VIQI).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The mean scores were: 28.3 (±9.33) in DISCERN, 2 (±0.81) in JAMA, 2.57 (±1.22) in GQS, and 11.73 (±4.06) in VIQI. JAMA score statistically significantly differed according to upload source (p = 0.002), video content (p = 0.023) and the speaker (p = 0.002). The DISCERN, JAMA, GQS, and VIQI scores showed significant correlations with each other.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The analyzed videos about neurorehabilitation in people with MS on YouTube® were quite old since the upload, with a moderate duration and number of views, but with a poor quality of the content, educational value, and quality analysis of the videos. Our research showed that there were statistically significant differences in terms of quality, transparency, and reliability of the information, depending on the upload source, video content and the speaker.</p>","PeriodicalId":21281,"journal":{"name":"Revista de neurologia","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.8000,"publicationDate":"2024-08-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11469091/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Content, educational value and quality analysis of videos about neurorehabilitation in people with multiple sclerosis on YouTube®.\",\"authors\":\"R Cano-de-la-Cuerda, S Marcos-Antón, A Blázquez-Fernández, M Fernández-Cañas, P Sánchez-Herrera Baeza, P Fernández-González, S Collado-Vázquez, C Jiménez-Antona, S Laguarta-Val\",\"doi\":\"10.33588/rn.7903.2024091\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>The use of YouTube® has spread among patients with chronic diseases such as multiple sclerosis (MS). These patients consult the available videos to learn more about their disease in terms of diagnosis and making decisions about treatments, including rehabilitation. The aim of this study was to evaluate the content, educational value, and quality analysis of MS videos about neurorehabilitation on YouTube® using quantitative instruments.</p><p><strong>Materials and methods: </strong>A search was conducted on YouTube®. The first 30 videos that met the inclusion criteria were reviewed. The videos were classified according to the upload source and the content. All videos included in the review were assessed by the DISCERN questionnaire, the JAMA benchmark, the global quality scale (GQS) and the video information and quality index (VIQI).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The mean scores were: 28.3 (±9.33) in DISCERN, 2 (±0.81) in JAMA, 2.57 (±1.22) in GQS, and 11.73 (±4.06) in VIQI. JAMA score statistically significantly differed according to upload source (p = 0.002), video content (p = 0.023) and the speaker (p = 0.002). The DISCERN, JAMA, GQS, and VIQI scores showed significant correlations with each other.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The analyzed videos about neurorehabilitation in people with MS on YouTube® were quite old since the upload, with a moderate duration and number of views, but with a poor quality of the content, educational value, and quality analysis of the videos. Our research showed that there were statistically significant differences in terms of quality, transparency, and reliability of the information, depending on the upload source, video content and the speaker.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":21281,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Revista de neurologia\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.8000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-08-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11469091/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Revista de neurologia\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.33588/rn.7903.2024091\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Revista de neurologia","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.33588/rn.7903.2024091","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

导言:YouTube®在多发性硬化症(MS)等慢性病患者中得到广泛使用。这些患者通过观看视频来进一步了解自己的疾病,以便做出诊断和治疗决定,包括康复治疗。本研究旨在使用定量工具对 YouTube® 上有关神经康复的多发性硬化症视频的内容、教育价值和质量分析进行评估:在 YouTube® 上进行搜索。对符合纳入标准的前 30 个视频进行了审查。根据上传来源和内容对视频进行分类。所有纳入审查的视频均通过 DISCERN 问卷、JAMA 基准、全球质量量表 (GQS) 以及视频信息和质量指数 (VIQI) 进行了评估:平均得分如下DISCERN 的平均得分为 28.3(±9.33)分,JAMA 的平均得分为 2(±0.81)分,GQS 的平均得分为 2.57(±1.22)分,VIQI 的平均得分为 11.73(±4.06)分。根据上传来源(p = 0.002)、视频内容(p = 0.023)和发言人(p = 0.002),JAMA 分数在统计学上存在明显差异。DISCERN、JAMA、GQS 和 VIQI 分数之间存在明显的相关性:YouTube®上关于多发性硬化症患者神经康复的分析视频上传时间较长,持续时间和观看次数适中,但内容质量、教育价值和视频质量分析较差。我们的研究表明,根据上传来源、视频内容和发言者的不同,信息的质量、透明度和可靠性在统计学上存在显著差异。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Content, educational value and quality analysis of videos about neurorehabilitation in people with multiple sclerosis on YouTube®.

Introduction: The use of YouTube® has spread among patients with chronic diseases such as multiple sclerosis (MS). These patients consult the available videos to learn more about their disease in terms of diagnosis and making decisions about treatments, including rehabilitation. The aim of this study was to evaluate the content, educational value, and quality analysis of MS videos about neurorehabilitation on YouTube® using quantitative instruments.

Materials and methods: A search was conducted on YouTube®. The first 30 videos that met the inclusion criteria were reviewed. The videos were classified according to the upload source and the content. All videos included in the review were assessed by the DISCERN questionnaire, the JAMA benchmark, the global quality scale (GQS) and the video information and quality index (VIQI).

Results: The mean scores were: 28.3 (±9.33) in DISCERN, 2 (±0.81) in JAMA, 2.57 (±1.22) in GQS, and 11.73 (±4.06) in VIQI. JAMA score statistically significantly differed according to upload source (p = 0.002), video content (p = 0.023) and the speaker (p = 0.002). The DISCERN, JAMA, GQS, and VIQI scores showed significant correlations with each other.

Conclusions: The analyzed videos about neurorehabilitation in people with MS on YouTube® were quite old since the upload, with a moderate duration and number of views, but with a poor quality of the content, educational value, and quality analysis of the videos. Our research showed that there were statistically significant differences in terms of quality, transparency, and reliability of the information, depending on the upload source, video content and the speaker.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Revista de neurologia
Revista de neurologia 医学-临床神经学
CiteScore
2.50
自引率
8.30%
发文量
117
审稿时长
3-8 weeks
期刊介绍: Revista de Neurología fomenta y difunde el conocimiento generado en lengua española sobre neurociencia, tanto clínica como experimental.
期刊最新文献
[Commercial devices for monitoring symptoms in Parkinson's disease: benefits, limitations and trends]. [Epilepsy in Angelman syndrome and the most common electroencephalographic findings]. [Glycemic management in the stroke unit and its relationship with morbidity and mortality]. [Nocturnal continuous subcutaneous infusion of apomorphine in advanced Parkinson's disease: a series of 37 cases]. [Construction and validation of a test for verbal auditory screening of cognitive alterations (CAVAC)].
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1