健康素养评估在医疗保健中的作用:健康素养行为 "护理结果的内容验证。

IF 1.4 4区 医学 Q3 NURSING International Journal of Nursing Knowledge Pub Date : 2024-07-14 DOI:10.1111/2047-3095.12482
Alba Correro-Bermejo, Pilar Bas-Sarmiento, José Manuel Romero-Sánchez, Olga Paloma-Castro, Miriam Poza-Méndez, Martina Fernández-Gutiérrez
{"title":"健康素养评估在医疗保健中的作用:健康素养行为 \"护理结果的内容验证。","authors":"Alba Correro-Bermejo, Pilar Bas-Sarmiento, José Manuel Romero-Sánchez, Olga Paloma-Castro, Miriam Poza-Méndez, Martina Fernández-Gutiérrez","doi":"10.1111/2047-3095.12482","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>To validate the content of the \"Health Literacy Behaviour\" nursing outcome (NO).</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A content validation study was conducted during 2022. Each indicator was included in the NO, and its response levels were operationally defined. The initial version of each indicator and its response levels were refined and validated through the Delphi method. A panel of health literacy (HL) and nursing taxonomies experts evaluated the content through two content validity indicators. The content validity of the NO and each index was determined by calculating the content validity index (CVI). A qualitative analysis of the recommendations provided by the experts was carried out to improve the understanding of the indicators and their levels.</p><p><strong>Findings: </strong>A total of 108 experts participated in this study. Mostly females with more than 10 years of professional experience. The results demonstrated a high CVI of the indicators and the NO \"Health Literacy Behaviour.\" All indicators achieved excellent (CVI ≥ 0.80) relevance and clarity. The CVI universal average method (CVI-p) of the NO achieved an excellent result of 0.90.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The indicators included in the NO \"Health Literacy Behaviour\" have content validity.</p><p><strong>Implications for nursing practice: </strong>These findings provide evidence-based indicators to measure the patient's actions to obtain, process, and understand information about health and disease, interact with the health system, and make informed health decisions. The validation of this NO would identify populations with low HL, allowing the health of this community to be promoted. Health literacy should be a priority objective of health management and policies.</p>","PeriodicalId":49051,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Nursing Knowledge","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.4000,"publicationDate":"2024-07-14","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Role of the health literacy assessment in healthcare: Content validation of \\\"Health Literacy Behaviour\\\" nursing outcome.\",\"authors\":\"Alba Correro-Bermejo, Pilar Bas-Sarmiento, José Manuel Romero-Sánchez, Olga Paloma-Castro, Miriam Poza-Méndez, Martina Fernández-Gutiérrez\",\"doi\":\"10.1111/2047-3095.12482\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>To validate the content of the \\\"Health Literacy Behaviour\\\" nursing outcome (NO).</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A content validation study was conducted during 2022. Each indicator was included in the NO, and its response levels were operationally defined. The initial version of each indicator and its response levels were refined and validated through the Delphi method. A panel of health literacy (HL) and nursing taxonomies experts evaluated the content through two content validity indicators. The content validity of the NO and each index was determined by calculating the content validity index (CVI). A qualitative analysis of the recommendations provided by the experts was carried out to improve the understanding of the indicators and their levels.</p><p><strong>Findings: </strong>A total of 108 experts participated in this study. Mostly females with more than 10 years of professional experience. The results demonstrated a high CVI of the indicators and the NO \\\"Health Literacy Behaviour.\\\" All indicators achieved excellent (CVI ≥ 0.80) relevance and clarity. The CVI universal average method (CVI-p) of the NO achieved an excellent result of 0.90.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The indicators included in the NO \\\"Health Literacy Behaviour\\\" have content validity.</p><p><strong>Implications for nursing practice: </strong>These findings provide evidence-based indicators to measure the patient's actions to obtain, process, and understand information about health and disease, interact with the health system, and make informed health decisions. The validation of this NO would identify populations with low HL, allowing the health of this community to be promoted. Health literacy should be a priority objective of health management and policies.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":49051,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"International Journal of Nursing Knowledge\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.4000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-07-14\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"International Journal of Nursing Knowledge\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1111/2047-3095.12482\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"NURSING\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal of Nursing Knowledge","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1111/2047-3095.12482","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"NURSING","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的:验证 "健康素养行为 "护理结果(NO)的内容:方法:2022 年开展了一项内容验证研究。每项指标都被纳入 "健康素养行为 "护理结果,并对其响应等级进行了操作性定义。通过德尔菲法(Delphi method)对每个指标的初始版本及其响应等级进行了完善和验证。一个由健康素养(HL)和护理分类学专家组成的小组通过两个内容效度指标对内容进行了评估。通过计算内容效度指数(CVI)来确定 NO 和每个指标的内容效度。对专家提出的建议进行了定性分析,以加深对指标及其等级的理解:共有 108 位专家参与了此次研究。大部分为女性,拥有 10 年以上的专业经验。结果表明,各项指标和 NO "健康素养行为 "的 CVI 都很高。所有指标的相关性和清晰度都非常好(CVI ≥ 0.80)。NO 的 CVI 通用平均法(CVI-p)取得了 0.90 的优异成绩:结论:"健康素养行为 "NO 所包含的指标具有内容效度:这些研究结果提供了以证据为基础的指标,用于衡量患者在获取、处理和理解有关健康和疾病的信息、与医疗系统互动以及做出明智的健康决定方面的行为。对这一 "NO "的验证将确定低健康素养人群,从而促进这一群体的健康。健康素养应成为卫生管理和政策的优先目标。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Role of the health literacy assessment in healthcare: Content validation of "Health Literacy Behaviour" nursing outcome.

Purpose: To validate the content of the "Health Literacy Behaviour" nursing outcome (NO).

Methods: A content validation study was conducted during 2022. Each indicator was included in the NO, and its response levels were operationally defined. The initial version of each indicator and its response levels were refined and validated through the Delphi method. A panel of health literacy (HL) and nursing taxonomies experts evaluated the content through two content validity indicators. The content validity of the NO and each index was determined by calculating the content validity index (CVI). A qualitative analysis of the recommendations provided by the experts was carried out to improve the understanding of the indicators and their levels.

Findings: A total of 108 experts participated in this study. Mostly females with more than 10 years of professional experience. The results demonstrated a high CVI of the indicators and the NO "Health Literacy Behaviour." All indicators achieved excellent (CVI ≥ 0.80) relevance and clarity. The CVI universal average method (CVI-p) of the NO achieved an excellent result of 0.90.

Conclusions: The indicators included in the NO "Health Literacy Behaviour" have content validity.

Implications for nursing practice: These findings provide evidence-based indicators to measure the patient's actions to obtain, process, and understand information about health and disease, interact with the health system, and make informed health decisions. The validation of this NO would identify populations with low HL, allowing the health of this community to be promoted. Health literacy should be a priority objective of health management and policies.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
2.90
自引率
14.30%
发文量
47
审稿时长
>12 weeks
期刊介绍: The International Journal of Nursing Knowledge, the official journal of NANDA International, is a peer-reviewed publication for key professionals committed to discovering, understanding and disseminating nursing knowledge. The Journal aims to clarify the knowledge base of nursing and improve patient safety by developing and disseminating nursing diagnoses and standardized nursing languages, and promoting their clinical use. It seeks to encourage education in clinical reasoning, diagnosis, and assessment and ensure global consistency in conceptual languages. The International Journal of Nursing Knowledge is an essential information resource for healthcare professionals concerned with developing nursing knowledge and /or clinical applications of standardized nursing languages in nursing research, education, practice, and policy. The Journal accepts papers which contribute significantly to international nursing knowledge, including concept analyses, original and applied research, review articles and international and historical perspectives, and welcomes articles discussing clinical challenges and guidelines, education initiatives, and policy initiatives.
期刊最新文献
Determining awareness of and readiness for standardized nursing languages in a mid-level midwestern hospital and associated school of nursing. Nursing diagnoses related to cardiovascular function in primary care: A scoping review: Diagnósticos de enfermagem relacionados a função cardiovascular na atenção primária: Scoping review. Nursing interventions for the proposed nursing diagnosis of puerperal fatigue: An integrative review. Nursing outcome "Knowledge: Wound management" for surgical incision wound care: Update, translate, and culturally adapt. Clinical validation of "spiritual distress (00066)" in parents of children with chronic diseases.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1