通过多普勒超声评估肾移植功能障碍:系统回顾和荟萃分析。

Pub Date : 2024-01-01 DOI:10.22088/cjim.15.3.374
Shirin Habibi, Seyed Morteza Bagheri, Mostafa Ghadamzadeh, Seyed Reza Saadat Mostafavi, Adeleh Dadkhah
{"title":"通过多普勒超声评估肾移植功能障碍:系统回顾和荟萃分析。","authors":"Shirin Habibi, Seyed Morteza Bagheri, Mostafa Ghadamzadeh, Seyed Reza Saadat Mostafavi, Adeleh Dadkhah","doi":"10.22088/cjim.15.3.374","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Doppler sonography parameters, particularly the resistive index (RI), have been identified as an essential tool for assessing renal transplant dysfunction (RTD). However, there is some ambiguity in the findings of previous research studies on this matter. Therefore, the objective of our study is to examine the relationship between changes in RI subsequent to RTD.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This was a systematic review and meta-analysis study. We searched three electronic databases PubMed, Web of Science, and Scopus, from the year 2000 to 10 May 2022. The main effect size was considered as the mean RI differences of cases with RTD confirmed by biopsy with control patients with no RTD. We used random effect models to pool the effect size.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Thirteen studies were included in our review. The pooled mean (95% CI) for the control group was calculated to be 0.71 (0.67, 0.75) and for patients with renal transplant dysfunction was 0.73 (0.68, 0.78), under a random effect model with high heterogeneity for both analyses (I<sup>2</sup>=98% and 97%, respectively). The pooled mean was significantly different between the control group and patients with RTD (P= 0.05), based on a t-test of pooled effect sizes.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Based on the result of our study, we showed that there is a significant difference between RI in patients with kidney transplant dysfunction and the control group. However, RI cannot substitute kidney biopsy in the management and diagnosis of RTD.</p>","PeriodicalId":0,"journal":{"name":"","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2024-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11246670/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Assessment of renal transplant dysfunction by doppler sonography: A systematic review and meta-analysis.\",\"authors\":\"Shirin Habibi, Seyed Morteza Bagheri, Mostafa Ghadamzadeh, Seyed Reza Saadat Mostafavi, Adeleh Dadkhah\",\"doi\":\"10.22088/cjim.15.3.374\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Doppler sonography parameters, particularly the resistive index (RI), have been identified as an essential tool for assessing renal transplant dysfunction (RTD). However, there is some ambiguity in the findings of previous research studies on this matter. Therefore, the objective of our study is to examine the relationship between changes in RI subsequent to RTD.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This was a systematic review and meta-analysis study. We searched three electronic databases PubMed, Web of Science, and Scopus, from the year 2000 to 10 May 2022. The main effect size was considered as the mean RI differences of cases with RTD confirmed by biopsy with control patients with no RTD. We used random effect models to pool the effect size.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Thirteen studies were included in our review. The pooled mean (95% CI) for the control group was calculated to be 0.71 (0.67, 0.75) and for patients with renal transplant dysfunction was 0.73 (0.68, 0.78), under a random effect model with high heterogeneity for both analyses (I<sup>2</sup>=98% and 97%, respectively). The pooled mean was significantly different between the control group and patients with RTD (P= 0.05), based on a t-test of pooled effect sizes.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Based on the result of our study, we showed that there is a significant difference between RI in patients with kidney transplant dysfunction and the control group. However, RI cannot substitute kidney biopsy in the management and diagnosis of RTD.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":0,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11246670/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.22088/cjim.15.3.374\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.22088/cjim.15.3.374","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:多普勒超声参数,尤其是阻力指数(RI),已被确定为评估肾移植功能障碍(RTD)的重要工具。然而,以往的相关研究结果存在一定的模糊性。因此,我们的研究旨在探讨 RI 变化与 RTD 之间的关系:这是一项系统回顾和荟萃分析研究。我们检索了从 2000 年到 2022 年 5 月 10 日的 PubMed、Web of Science 和 Scopus 三个电子数据库。主效应大小是指经活检证实有RTD的病例与无RTD的对照组患者的平均RI差异。我们使用随机效应模型来汇集效应大小:我们的研究共纳入了 13 项研究。在随机效应模型下,计算出对照组的汇集平均值(95% CI)为 0.71(0.67,0.75),肾移植功能障碍患者的汇集平均值为 0.73(0.68,0.78),两项分析的异质性都很高(I2=98%,97%)。根据集合效应大小的t检验,对照组和RTD患者的集合平均值有明显差异(P= 0.05):根据我们的研究结果,我们发现肾移植功能障碍患者的 RI 与对照组存在明显差异。然而,在 RTD 的管理和诊断中,RI 无法替代肾活检。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
Assessment of renal transplant dysfunction by doppler sonography: A systematic review and meta-analysis.

Background: Doppler sonography parameters, particularly the resistive index (RI), have been identified as an essential tool for assessing renal transplant dysfunction (RTD). However, there is some ambiguity in the findings of previous research studies on this matter. Therefore, the objective of our study is to examine the relationship between changes in RI subsequent to RTD.

Methods: This was a systematic review and meta-analysis study. We searched three electronic databases PubMed, Web of Science, and Scopus, from the year 2000 to 10 May 2022. The main effect size was considered as the mean RI differences of cases with RTD confirmed by biopsy with control patients with no RTD. We used random effect models to pool the effect size.

Results: Thirteen studies were included in our review. The pooled mean (95% CI) for the control group was calculated to be 0.71 (0.67, 0.75) and for patients with renal transplant dysfunction was 0.73 (0.68, 0.78), under a random effect model with high heterogeneity for both analyses (I2=98% and 97%, respectively). The pooled mean was significantly different between the control group and patients with RTD (P= 0.05), based on a t-test of pooled effect sizes.

Conclusions: Based on the result of our study, we showed that there is a significant difference between RI in patients with kidney transplant dysfunction and the control group. However, RI cannot substitute kidney biopsy in the management and diagnosis of RTD.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1