Hampig Raphael Kourie , Joseph Zouein , Ziad Zalaquett , Alain Chebly , Lewis Nasr , Fadi El Karak , Maroun Sadek , Ousama Safar , Mouin Fouani , Nizar Bitar , Kamal Kachmar , Fady Nasr , Fadi Farhat , Jawad Makarem , Joseph Kattan , Julien Taieb
{"title":"液体活检作为转移性结直肠癌 KRAS/NRAS/BRAF 基线检测工具。","authors":"Hampig Raphael Kourie , Joseph Zouein , Ziad Zalaquett , Alain Chebly , Lewis Nasr , Fadi El Karak , Maroun Sadek , Ousama Safar , Mouin Fouani , Nizar Bitar , Kamal Kachmar , Fady Nasr , Fadi Farhat , Jawad Makarem , Joseph Kattan , Julien Taieb","doi":"10.1016/j.clinre.2024.102417","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Background</h3><div>The absence of <em>KRAS</em> and <em>NRAS</em> gene mutations (<em>RAS</em> wild type) in metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC), is associated with a good response to targeted therapy with anti-<em>EGFR</em> receptor antibodies. The current gold standard for <em>RAS</em> mutational status identification is genetic testing on tissue biopsy samples.</div></div><div><h3>Objective</h3><div>This study aimed to assess the relevance of liquid biopsy as a less invasive alternative to tissue biopsy for detecting <em>KRAS/NRAS</em> and <em>BRAF</em> mutations in patients with metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC). The study also aimed to determine the concordance between liquid biopsy and tissue biopsy.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>This is a phase IV, observational, uncontrolled, non-comparative, non-randomized, open label study. <em>RAS</em>/<em>BRAF</em> status will be tested at baseline using tissue and liquid biopsy using the Idylla/Biocartis PCR-based device. The primary endpoint is the comparison of the <em>RAS</em> status based on liquid biopsy with the <em>RAS</em> status based on tissue biopsy.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>100 patients with mCRC were included in the study. 75 % of patients showed concordant results between liquid biopsy and tissue biopsy, while 25 % had discordant results. Liquid biopsy demonstrated a sensitivity of 62 % and a specificity of 93 %. The accuracy of liquid biopsy was 75 %, with a moderate agreement between the two tests. The most frequent mutations in concordant cases were in <em>KRAS</em> (41 %), followed by <em>NRAS</em> (4 %) and <em>BRAF</em> (3 %). Mutations were not detected in 42 % of tissue biopsy samples and 60 % of liquid biopsy samples. The presence of hepatic metastases did not significantly affect the concordance between the biopsy methods.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><div>Liquid biopsy using the Idylla™ system showed a relatively low sensitivity but high specificity for detecting <em>KRAS</em>/<em>NRAS</em> and <em>BRAF</em> mutations in mCRC patients. Despite some discordant cases, liquid biopsy remains a promising alternative to tissue biopsy due to its non-invasiveness, ability to provide multiple samples, and better representation of tumor heterogeneity.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":10424,"journal":{"name":"Clinics and research in hepatology and gastroenterology","volume":"48 8","pages":"Article 102417"},"PeriodicalIF":2.6000,"publicationDate":"2024-07-14","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Liquid biopsy as a tool for KRAS/NRAS/BRAF baseline testing in metastatic colorectal cancer\",\"authors\":\"Hampig Raphael Kourie , Joseph Zouein , Ziad Zalaquett , Alain Chebly , Lewis Nasr , Fadi El Karak , Maroun Sadek , Ousama Safar , Mouin Fouani , Nizar Bitar , Kamal Kachmar , Fady Nasr , Fadi Farhat , Jawad Makarem , Joseph Kattan , Julien Taieb\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.clinre.2024.102417\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><h3>Background</h3><div>The absence of <em>KRAS</em> and <em>NRAS</em> gene mutations (<em>RAS</em> wild type) in metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC), is associated with a good response to targeted therapy with anti-<em>EGFR</em> receptor antibodies. The current gold standard for <em>RAS</em> mutational status identification is genetic testing on tissue biopsy samples.</div></div><div><h3>Objective</h3><div>This study aimed to assess the relevance of liquid biopsy as a less invasive alternative to tissue biopsy for detecting <em>KRAS/NRAS</em> and <em>BRAF</em> mutations in patients with metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC). The study also aimed to determine the concordance between liquid biopsy and tissue biopsy.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>This is a phase IV, observational, uncontrolled, non-comparative, non-randomized, open label study. <em>RAS</em>/<em>BRAF</em> status will be tested at baseline using tissue and liquid biopsy using the Idylla/Biocartis PCR-based device. The primary endpoint is the comparison of the <em>RAS</em> status based on liquid biopsy with the <em>RAS</em> status based on tissue biopsy.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>100 patients with mCRC were included in the study. 75 % of patients showed concordant results between liquid biopsy and tissue biopsy, while 25 % had discordant results. Liquid biopsy demonstrated a sensitivity of 62 % and a specificity of 93 %. The accuracy of liquid biopsy was 75 %, with a moderate agreement between the two tests. The most frequent mutations in concordant cases were in <em>KRAS</em> (41 %), followed by <em>NRAS</em> (4 %) and <em>BRAF</em> (3 %). Mutations were not detected in 42 % of tissue biopsy samples and 60 % of liquid biopsy samples. The presence of hepatic metastases did not significantly affect the concordance between the biopsy methods.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><div>Liquid biopsy using the Idylla™ system showed a relatively low sensitivity but high specificity for detecting <em>KRAS</em>/<em>NRAS</em> and <em>BRAF</em> mutations in mCRC patients. Despite some discordant cases, liquid biopsy remains a promising alternative to tissue biopsy due to its non-invasiveness, ability to provide multiple samples, and better representation of tumor heterogeneity.</div></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":10424,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Clinics and research in hepatology and gastroenterology\",\"volume\":\"48 8\",\"pages\":\"Article 102417\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.6000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-07-14\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Clinics and research in hepatology and gastroenterology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2210740124001384\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"GASTROENTEROLOGY & HEPATOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Clinics and research in hepatology and gastroenterology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2210740124001384","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"GASTROENTEROLOGY & HEPATOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
Liquid biopsy as a tool for KRAS/NRAS/BRAF baseline testing in metastatic colorectal cancer
Background
The absence of KRAS and NRAS gene mutations (RAS wild type) in metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC), is associated with a good response to targeted therapy with anti-EGFR receptor antibodies. The current gold standard for RAS mutational status identification is genetic testing on tissue biopsy samples.
Objective
This study aimed to assess the relevance of liquid biopsy as a less invasive alternative to tissue biopsy for detecting KRAS/NRAS and BRAF mutations in patients with metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC). The study also aimed to determine the concordance between liquid biopsy and tissue biopsy.
Methods
This is a phase IV, observational, uncontrolled, non-comparative, non-randomized, open label study. RAS/BRAF status will be tested at baseline using tissue and liquid biopsy using the Idylla/Biocartis PCR-based device. The primary endpoint is the comparison of the RAS status based on liquid biopsy with the RAS status based on tissue biopsy.
Results
100 patients with mCRC were included in the study. 75 % of patients showed concordant results between liquid biopsy and tissue biopsy, while 25 % had discordant results. Liquid biopsy demonstrated a sensitivity of 62 % and a specificity of 93 %. The accuracy of liquid biopsy was 75 %, with a moderate agreement between the two tests. The most frequent mutations in concordant cases were in KRAS (41 %), followed by NRAS (4 %) and BRAF (3 %). Mutations were not detected in 42 % of tissue biopsy samples and 60 % of liquid biopsy samples. The presence of hepatic metastases did not significantly affect the concordance between the biopsy methods.
Conclusion
Liquid biopsy using the Idylla™ system showed a relatively low sensitivity but high specificity for detecting KRAS/NRAS and BRAF mutations in mCRC patients. Despite some discordant cases, liquid biopsy remains a promising alternative to tissue biopsy due to its non-invasiveness, ability to provide multiple samples, and better representation of tumor heterogeneity.
期刊介绍:
Clinics and Research in Hepatology and Gastroenterology publishes high-quality original research papers in the field of hepatology and gastroenterology. The editors put the accent on rapid communication of new research and clinical developments and so called "hot topic" issues. Following a clear Editorial line, besides original articles and case reports, each issue features editorials, commentaries and reviews. The journal encourages research and discussion between all those involved in the specialty on an international level. All articles are peer reviewed by international experts, the articles in press are online and indexed in the international databases (Current Contents, Pubmed, Scopus, Science Direct).
Clinics and Research in Hepatology and Gastroenterology is a subscription journal (with optional open access), which allows you to publish your research without any cost to you (unless you proactively chose the open access option). Your article will be available to all researchers around the globe whose institution has a subscription to the journal.