在 "全国父亲角色倡议 "中提升黑人父亲的经验:24/7 Dad® 课程和个案管理服务的优势和有待改进之处。

IF 2.6 3区 心理学 Q1 FAMILY STUDIES Family Process Pub Date : 2024-07-15 DOI:10.1111/famp.13036
Laura A Voith, Katie N Russell, Ashley Withrow, Jennifer Kearney, Tian Xia, Darrell Coleman
{"title":"在 \"全国父亲角色倡议 \"中提升黑人父亲的经验:24/7 Dad® 课程和个案管理服务的优势和有待改进之处。","authors":"Laura A Voith, Katie N Russell, Ashley Withrow, Jennifer Kearney, Tian Xia, Darrell Coleman","doi":"10.1111/famp.13036","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>The Healthy Marriage and Responsible Fatherhood grant program is one of the most robust mechanisms supporting fatherhood programming in the United States, with the gold standard of care including fatherhood curriculum (e.g., 24/7 Dad®) and case management services. Despite the fact that fatherhood in the United States is not a monolith and Black fathers make up over 40% of those served through Responsible Fatherhood (RF) program, little research explicitly centers the lived experiences of low-income Black fathers. The current study used focus groups with fathers (n = 23) and staff (n = 8) enrolled in a RF grantee program. Thematic analysis was used to determine programmatic mechanisms supporting these fathers' success and areas for improvement. Our findings highlight that the creation of a \"safe space\" by facilitators and the power of the group dynamic were essential elements for fathers' success overall. We also identified numerous programmatic mechanisms supporting Black fathers' success specific to fathering, healthy relationships, and economic stability. Finally, we highlighted important limitations that may impede the success of low-income, Black fathers related to the 24/7 Dad® curriculum, engagement efforts, and economic stability, and discuss related practice, policy, and research recommendations.</p>","PeriodicalId":51396,"journal":{"name":"Family Process","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":2.6000,"publicationDate":"2024-07-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Elevating Black fathers' experiences in the National Fatherhood Initiative: Strengths and areas for improvement of 24/7 Dad® curriculum and case management services.\",\"authors\":\"Laura A Voith, Katie N Russell, Ashley Withrow, Jennifer Kearney, Tian Xia, Darrell Coleman\",\"doi\":\"10.1111/famp.13036\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>The Healthy Marriage and Responsible Fatherhood grant program is one of the most robust mechanisms supporting fatherhood programming in the United States, with the gold standard of care including fatherhood curriculum (e.g., 24/7 Dad®) and case management services. Despite the fact that fatherhood in the United States is not a monolith and Black fathers make up over 40% of those served through Responsible Fatherhood (RF) program, little research explicitly centers the lived experiences of low-income Black fathers. The current study used focus groups with fathers (n = 23) and staff (n = 8) enrolled in a RF grantee program. Thematic analysis was used to determine programmatic mechanisms supporting these fathers' success and areas for improvement. Our findings highlight that the creation of a \\\"safe space\\\" by facilitators and the power of the group dynamic were essential elements for fathers' success overall. We also identified numerous programmatic mechanisms supporting Black fathers' success specific to fathering, healthy relationships, and economic stability. Finally, we highlighted important limitations that may impede the success of low-income, Black fathers related to the 24/7 Dad® curriculum, engagement efforts, and economic stability, and discuss related practice, policy, and research recommendations.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":51396,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Family Process\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.6000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-07-15\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Family Process\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"102\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1111/famp.13036\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"心理学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"FAMILY STUDIES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Family Process","FirstCategoryId":"102","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1111/famp.13036","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"FAMILY STUDIES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

健康婚姻与父亲责任补助计划是美国支持父亲责任计划的最有力机制之一,其黄金标准包括父亲责任课程(如 24/7 Dad®)和个案管理服务。尽管美国的父亲角色并非铁板一块,而且黑人父亲占 "负责任父亲"(RF)计划服务对象的 40% 以上,但很少有研究明确以低收入黑人父亲的生活经历为中心。目前的研究采用焦点小组的形式,参加该计划的父亲(n = 23)和工作人员(n = 8)都参加了该计划。专题分析用于确定支持这些父亲取得成功的计划机制和需要改进的领域。我们的研究结果突出表明,促进者创造的 "安全空间 "和小组动态的力量是父亲们取得整体成功的基本要素。我们还发现了许多支持黑人父亲成功的计划机制,特别是在父爱、健康关系和经济稳定方面。最后,我们强调了可能阻碍低收入黑人父亲在 24/7 Dad® 课程、参与努力和经济稳定方面取得成功的重要限制因素,并讨论了相关的实践、政策和研究建议。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Elevating Black fathers' experiences in the National Fatherhood Initiative: Strengths and areas for improvement of 24/7 Dad® curriculum and case management services.

The Healthy Marriage and Responsible Fatherhood grant program is one of the most robust mechanisms supporting fatherhood programming in the United States, with the gold standard of care including fatherhood curriculum (e.g., 24/7 Dad®) and case management services. Despite the fact that fatherhood in the United States is not a monolith and Black fathers make up over 40% of those served through Responsible Fatherhood (RF) program, little research explicitly centers the lived experiences of low-income Black fathers. The current study used focus groups with fathers (n = 23) and staff (n = 8) enrolled in a RF grantee program. Thematic analysis was used to determine programmatic mechanisms supporting these fathers' success and areas for improvement. Our findings highlight that the creation of a "safe space" by facilitators and the power of the group dynamic were essential elements for fathers' success overall. We also identified numerous programmatic mechanisms supporting Black fathers' success specific to fathering, healthy relationships, and economic stability. Finally, we highlighted important limitations that may impede the success of low-income, Black fathers related to the 24/7 Dad® curriculum, engagement efforts, and economic stability, and discuss related practice, policy, and research recommendations.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Family Process
Family Process Multiple-
CiteScore
8.00
自引率
5.10%
发文量
96
期刊介绍: Family Process is an international, multidisciplinary, peer-reviewed journal committed to publishing original articles, including theory and practice, philosophical underpinnings, qualitative and quantitative clinical research, and training in couple and family therapy, family interaction, and family relationships with networks and larger systems.
期刊最新文献
Issue Information The family alliance as a facilitator of therapeutic change in systemic relational psychotherapy for borderline personality disorder: A case study A latent profile analysis of relationship satisfaction and self-regulation among low-income participants who attended relationship education with a partner. Within-family processes among safety nets, maternal parenting stress, and child behavioral problems among low-income families: The importance of race and ethnicity. Hopelessness for family members of individuals with borderline personality disorder.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1