范围界定审查:针对 65 岁及以上人群尿失禁的科技护理干预措施

Rico Gröning BSc, Elisabeth Schöttler BSc, Stefan Michalski BA, Stefan Schmidt PhD
{"title":"范围界定审查:针对 65 岁及以上人群尿失禁的科技护理干预措施","authors":"Rico Gröning BSc,&nbsp;Elisabeth Schöttler BSc,&nbsp;Stefan Michalski BA,&nbsp;Stefan Schmidt PhD","doi":"10.1111/ijun.12409","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>To review and summarize the available evidence on technology-based nursing interventions for urinary incontinence. Scoping review. A review of english and German research articles published up to April 2024 examining nursing interventions in older people (&gt; = 65 years) was conducted. Studies were retrieved by searching the Medline electronic database via PubMed and CINAHL database. Eight studies met the inclusion criteria. The review followed the updated methodological guidance for the conduct of scoping reviews published in 2020. Eight studies and three different types of interventions based on digital technologies were identified: sensor-based interventions, app-based interventions and computer-based digital expert systems. The interventions showed positive and no effects. The studies showed a high variety in terms of study designs, settings, measurement instruments, measured outcomes and were consequently not comparable. The current research density is too low to recommend interventions. Therefore, more high-quality studies are needed. Studies should be designed to be comparable, if possible. The definition of a core outcome set is therefore indicated. There is a research gap that should be closed by high-quality and comparable studies so that patients can benefit from evidence-based incontinence care in the future. Defining core outcomes can help to better compare future studies. Technology-based interventions should be investigated specifically for older people in the future as, in addition to the potential for improved incontinence care, they also have the potential to reduce the burden on caregivers and conserve staff resources. No patient or public contribution.</p>","PeriodicalId":50281,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Urological Nursing","volume":"18 2","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.4000,"publicationDate":"2024-07-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1111/ijun.12409","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Scoping review: Technology-based nursing interventions for urinary incontinence for individuals 65 years and older\",\"authors\":\"Rico Gröning BSc,&nbsp;Elisabeth Schöttler BSc,&nbsp;Stefan Michalski BA,&nbsp;Stefan Schmidt PhD\",\"doi\":\"10.1111/ijun.12409\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p>To review and summarize the available evidence on technology-based nursing interventions for urinary incontinence. Scoping review. A review of english and German research articles published up to April 2024 examining nursing interventions in older people (&gt; = 65 years) was conducted. Studies were retrieved by searching the Medline electronic database via PubMed and CINAHL database. Eight studies met the inclusion criteria. The review followed the updated methodological guidance for the conduct of scoping reviews published in 2020. Eight studies and three different types of interventions based on digital technologies were identified: sensor-based interventions, app-based interventions and computer-based digital expert systems. The interventions showed positive and no effects. The studies showed a high variety in terms of study designs, settings, measurement instruments, measured outcomes and were consequently not comparable. The current research density is too low to recommend interventions. Therefore, more high-quality studies are needed. Studies should be designed to be comparable, if possible. The definition of a core outcome set is therefore indicated. There is a research gap that should be closed by high-quality and comparable studies so that patients can benefit from evidence-based incontinence care in the future. Defining core outcomes can help to better compare future studies. Technology-based interventions should be investigated specifically for older people in the future as, in addition to the potential for improved incontinence care, they also have the potential to reduce the burden on caregivers and conserve staff resources. No patient or public contribution.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":50281,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"International Journal of Urological Nursing\",\"volume\":\"18 2\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.4000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-07-15\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1111/ijun.12409\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"International Journal of Urological Nursing\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/ijun.12409\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"NURSING\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal of Urological Nursing","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/ijun.12409","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"NURSING","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

回顾并总结以技术为基础的尿失禁护理干预措施的现有证据。范围界定综述。综述截至 2024 年 4 月发表的有关老年人(65 岁)护理干预的英语和德语研究文章。研究通过 PubMed 和 CINAHL 数据库检索 Medline 电子数据库。八项研究符合纳入标准。综述遵循了 2020 年发布的最新范围界定综述方法指南。确定了八项研究和基于数字技术的三种不同类型的干预措施:基于传感器的干预措施、基于应用程序的干预措施和基于计算机的数字专家系统。这些干预措施产生了积极影响,也没有产生任何影响。这些研究在研究设计、环境、测量工具和测量结果方面存在很大差异,因此不具有可比性。目前的研究密度太低,无法推荐干预措施。因此,需要更多高质量的研究。如果可能,研究的设计应具有可比性。因此,需要定义一套核心结果。目前存在研究空白,应通过高质量和可比性的研究来填补这一空白,从而使患者在未来能够从循证尿失禁护理中受益。定义核心结果有助于更好地比较未来的研究。未来应专门针对老年人调查以技术为基础的干预措施,因为这些措施除了有可能改善失禁护理外,还有可能减轻护理人员的负担并节约人力资源。无患者或公众捐款。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

摘要图片

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Scoping review: Technology-based nursing interventions for urinary incontinence for individuals 65 years and older

To review and summarize the available evidence on technology-based nursing interventions for urinary incontinence. Scoping review. A review of english and German research articles published up to April 2024 examining nursing interventions in older people (> = 65 years) was conducted. Studies were retrieved by searching the Medline electronic database via PubMed and CINAHL database. Eight studies met the inclusion criteria. The review followed the updated methodological guidance for the conduct of scoping reviews published in 2020. Eight studies and three different types of interventions based on digital technologies were identified: sensor-based interventions, app-based interventions and computer-based digital expert systems. The interventions showed positive and no effects. The studies showed a high variety in terms of study designs, settings, measurement instruments, measured outcomes and were consequently not comparable. The current research density is too low to recommend interventions. Therefore, more high-quality studies are needed. Studies should be designed to be comparable, if possible. The definition of a core outcome set is therefore indicated. There is a research gap that should be closed by high-quality and comparable studies so that patients can benefit from evidence-based incontinence care in the future. Defining core outcomes can help to better compare future studies. Technology-based interventions should be investigated specifically for older people in the future as, in addition to the potential for improved incontinence care, they also have the potential to reduce the burden on caregivers and conserve staff resources. No patient or public contribution.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
0.80
自引率
20.00%
发文量
35
审稿时长
>12 weeks
期刊介绍: International Journal of Urological Nursing is an international peer-reviewed Journal for all nurses, non-specialist and specialist, who care for individuals with urological disorders. It is relevant for nurses working in a variety of settings: inpatient care, outpatient care, ambulatory care, community care, operating departments and specialist clinics. The Journal covers the whole spectrum of urological nursing skills and knowledge. It supports the publication of local issues of relevance to a wider international community to disseminate good practice. The International Journal of Urological Nursing is clinically focused, evidence-based and welcomes contributions in the following clinical and non-clinical areas: -General Urology- Continence care- Oncology- Andrology- Stoma care- Paediatric urology- Men’s health- Uro-gynaecology- Reconstructive surgery- Clinical audit- Clinical governance- Nurse-led services- Reflective analysis- Education- Management- Research- Leadership The Journal welcomes original research papers, practice development papers and literature reviews. It also invites shorter papers such as case reports, critical commentary, reflective analysis and reports of audit, as well as contributions to regular sections such as the media reviews section. The International Journal of Urological Nursing supports the development of academic writing within the specialty and particularly welcomes papers from young researchers or practitioners who are seeking to build a publication profile.
期刊最新文献
The effects of continuous care utilizing rational emotive therapy on prostate cancer patients Knowledge and practices of nurses working in urology clinics on fluid–electrolyte monitoring and management Postoperative nursing in robot-assisted urologic surgery: Are there any platform-based differences? Adherence and uncertainty during rehabilitation for urinary incontinence: Validation of a scale Assessing the reliability and usefulness of ChatGPT responses on intermittent catheterization queries: A critical analysis
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1