胰岛自身免疫的环境决定因素(ENDIA)对澳大利亚 1 型糖尿病高危儿童从怀孕到儿童期的纵向前瞻性队列研究:父母人口统计学和出生信息。

IF 3.7 2区 医学 Q2 ENDOCRINOLOGY & METABOLISM BMJ Open Diabetes Research & Care Pub Date : 2024-07-16 DOI:10.1136/bmjdrc-2024-004130
Rebecca L Thomson, Helena Oakey, Aveni Haynes, Maria E Craig, Leonard C Harrison, John M Wentworth, Amanda Anderson, Pat Ashwood, Simon Barry, Bek Brittain, James D Brown, Peter G Colman, Elizabeth A Davis, Emma Hamilton-Williams, Dao Huynh, Tony Huynh, Ki-Wook Kim, Kelly J McGorm, Grant Morahan, William Rawlinson, Richard O Sinnott, Georgia Soldatos, Jason A Tye-Din, Peter J Vuillermin, Megan A S Penno, Jennifer J Couper
{"title":"胰岛自身免疫的环境决定因素(ENDIA)对澳大利亚 1 型糖尿病高危儿童从怀孕到儿童期的纵向前瞻性队列研究:父母人口统计学和出生信息。","authors":"Rebecca L Thomson, Helena Oakey, Aveni Haynes, Maria E Craig, Leonard C Harrison, John M Wentworth, Amanda Anderson, Pat Ashwood, Simon Barry, Bek Brittain, James D Brown, Peter G Colman, Elizabeth A Davis, Emma Hamilton-Williams, Dao Huynh, Tony Huynh, Ki-Wook Kim, Kelly J McGorm, Grant Morahan, William Rawlinson, Richard O Sinnott, Georgia Soldatos, Jason A Tye-Din, Peter J Vuillermin, Megan A S Penno, Jennifer J Couper","doi":"10.1136/bmjdrc-2024-004130","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>The Environmental Determinants of Islet Autoimmunity (ENDIA) Study is an ongoing Australian prospective cohort study investigating how modifiable prenatal and early-life exposures drive the development of islet autoimmunity and type 1 diabetes (T1D) in children. In this profile, we describe the cohort's parental demographics, maternal and neonatal outcomes and human leukocyte antigen (HLA) genotypes.</p><p><strong>Research design and methods: </strong>Inclusion criteria were an unborn child, or infant aged less than 6 months, with a first-degree relative (FDR) with T1D. The primary outcome was persistent islet autoimmunity, with children followed until a T1D diagnosis or 10 years of age. Demographic data were collected at enrollment. Lifestyle, clinical and anthropometric data were collected at each visit during pregnancy and clinical pregnancy and birth data were verified against medical case notes. Data were compared between mothers with and without T1D. HLA genotyping was performed on the ENDIA child and all available FDRs.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The final cohort comprised 1473 infants born to 1214 gestational mothers across 1453 pregnancies, with 80% enrolled during pregnancy. The distribution of familial T1D probands was 62% maternal, 28% paternal and 11% sibling. The frequency of high-risk HLA genotypes was highest in T1D probands, followed by ENDIA infants, and lowest among unaffected family members. Mothers with T1D had higher rates of pregnancy complications and perinatal intervention, and larger babies of shorter gestation. Parent demographics were comparable to the Australian population for age, parity and obesity. A greater percentage of ENDIA parents were Australian born, lived in a major city and had higher socioeconomic advantage and education.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>This comprehensive profile provides the context for understanding ENDIA's scope, methodology, unique strengths and limitations. Now fully recruited, ENDIA will provide unique insights into the roles of early-life factors in the development of islet autoimmunity and T1D in the Australian environment.</p><p><strong>Trial registration number: </strong>ACTRN12613000794707.</p>","PeriodicalId":9151,"journal":{"name":"BMJ Open Diabetes Research & Care","volume":"12 4","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.7000,"publicationDate":"2024-07-16","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11268074/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Environmental Determinants of Islet Autoimmunity (ENDIA) longitudinal prospective pregnancy to childhood cohort study of Australian children at risk of type 1 diabetes: parental demographics and birth information.\",\"authors\":\"Rebecca L Thomson, Helena Oakey, Aveni Haynes, Maria E Craig, Leonard C Harrison, John M Wentworth, Amanda Anderson, Pat Ashwood, Simon Barry, Bek Brittain, James D Brown, Peter G Colman, Elizabeth A Davis, Emma Hamilton-Williams, Dao Huynh, Tony Huynh, Ki-Wook Kim, Kelly J McGorm, Grant Morahan, William Rawlinson, Richard O Sinnott, Georgia Soldatos, Jason A Tye-Din, Peter J Vuillermin, Megan A S Penno, Jennifer J Couper\",\"doi\":\"10.1136/bmjdrc-2024-004130\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>The Environmental Determinants of Islet Autoimmunity (ENDIA) Study is an ongoing Australian prospective cohort study investigating how modifiable prenatal and early-life exposures drive the development of islet autoimmunity and type 1 diabetes (T1D) in children. In this profile, we describe the cohort's parental demographics, maternal and neonatal outcomes and human leukocyte antigen (HLA) genotypes.</p><p><strong>Research design and methods: </strong>Inclusion criteria were an unborn child, or infant aged less than 6 months, with a first-degree relative (FDR) with T1D. The primary outcome was persistent islet autoimmunity, with children followed until a T1D diagnosis or 10 years of age. Demographic data were collected at enrollment. Lifestyle, clinical and anthropometric data were collected at each visit during pregnancy and clinical pregnancy and birth data were verified against medical case notes. Data were compared between mothers with and without T1D. HLA genotyping was performed on the ENDIA child and all available FDRs.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The final cohort comprised 1473 infants born to 1214 gestational mothers across 1453 pregnancies, with 80% enrolled during pregnancy. The distribution of familial T1D probands was 62% maternal, 28% paternal and 11% sibling. The frequency of high-risk HLA genotypes was highest in T1D probands, followed by ENDIA infants, and lowest among unaffected family members. Mothers with T1D had higher rates of pregnancy complications and perinatal intervention, and larger babies of shorter gestation. Parent demographics were comparable to the Australian population for age, parity and obesity. A greater percentage of ENDIA parents were Australian born, lived in a major city and had higher socioeconomic advantage and education.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>This comprehensive profile provides the context for understanding ENDIA's scope, methodology, unique strengths and limitations. Now fully recruited, ENDIA will provide unique insights into the roles of early-life factors in the development of islet autoimmunity and T1D in the Australian environment.</p><p><strong>Trial registration number: </strong>ACTRN12613000794707.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":9151,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"BMJ Open Diabetes Research & Care\",\"volume\":\"12 4\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.7000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-07-16\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11268074/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"BMJ Open Diabetes Research & Care\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1136/bmjdrc-2024-004130\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"ENDOCRINOLOGY & METABOLISM\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"BMJ Open Diabetes Research & Care","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1136/bmjdrc-2024-004130","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ENDOCRINOLOGY & METABOLISM","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

简介:胰岛自身免疫的环境决定因素(ENDIA)研究是一项正在进行中的澳大利亚前瞻性队列研究,旨在调查可改变的产前和生命早期暴露是如何驱动儿童胰岛自身免疫和1型糖尿病(T1D)的发展的。在本简介中,我们介绍了队列中父母的人口统计学特征、孕产妇和新生儿结局以及人类白细胞抗原(HLA)基因型:纳入标准为未出生的婴儿或年龄小于 6 个月的婴儿,其一级亲属 (FDR) 患有 T1D。主要研究结果为持续性胰岛自身免疫,对患儿进行随访,直至确诊T1D或患儿10岁。入学时收集了人口统计学数据。孕期每次就诊时都会收集生活方式、临床和人体测量数据,并根据医疗病例记录核实临床孕期和出生数据。对患有和未患有 T1D 的母亲的数据进行比较。对ENDIA儿童和所有可用的FDR进行了HLA基因分型:最终队列由 1473 名婴儿组成,这些婴儿由 1214 名妊娠母亲在 1453 次妊娠期间所生,其中 80% 在妊娠期间入组。家族性 T1D 感知者的分布为母系 62%、父系 28%、同胞 11%。高风险 HLA 基因型在 T1D 感 染者中出现的频率最高,其次是ENDIA 婴儿,而在未受影响的家庭成员中出现的频率最低。患有 T1D 的母亲妊娠并发症和围产期干预率较高,妊娠期较短的婴儿体型较大。父母的年龄、奇偶性和肥胖程度与澳大利亚人口相当。更多的ENDIA父母出生在澳大利亚,居住在大城市,拥有较高的社会经济优势和教育程度:这一全面的概况为了解ENDIA的范围、方法、独特优势和局限性提供了背景。ENDIA现已全面招募,它将为了解澳大利亚环境中早期生活因素在胰岛自身免疫和T1D发展中的作用提供独特的见解:ACTRN12613000794707。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Environmental Determinants of Islet Autoimmunity (ENDIA) longitudinal prospective pregnancy to childhood cohort study of Australian children at risk of type 1 diabetes: parental demographics and birth information.

Introduction: The Environmental Determinants of Islet Autoimmunity (ENDIA) Study is an ongoing Australian prospective cohort study investigating how modifiable prenatal and early-life exposures drive the development of islet autoimmunity and type 1 diabetes (T1D) in children. In this profile, we describe the cohort's parental demographics, maternal and neonatal outcomes and human leukocyte antigen (HLA) genotypes.

Research design and methods: Inclusion criteria were an unborn child, or infant aged less than 6 months, with a first-degree relative (FDR) with T1D. The primary outcome was persistent islet autoimmunity, with children followed until a T1D diagnosis or 10 years of age. Demographic data were collected at enrollment. Lifestyle, clinical and anthropometric data were collected at each visit during pregnancy and clinical pregnancy and birth data were verified against medical case notes. Data were compared between mothers with and without T1D. HLA genotyping was performed on the ENDIA child and all available FDRs.

Results: The final cohort comprised 1473 infants born to 1214 gestational mothers across 1453 pregnancies, with 80% enrolled during pregnancy. The distribution of familial T1D probands was 62% maternal, 28% paternal and 11% sibling. The frequency of high-risk HLA genotypes was highest in T1D probands, followed by ENDIA infants, and lowest among unaffected family members. Mothers with T1D had higher rates of pregnancy complications and perinatal intervention, and larger babies of shorter gestation. Parent demographics were comparable to the Australian population for age, parity and obesity. A greater percentage of ENDIA parents were Australian born, lived in a major city and had higher socioeconomic advantage and education.

Conclusions: This comprehensive profile provides the context for understanding ENDIA's scope, methodology, unique strengths and limitations. Now fully recruited, ENDIA will provide unique insights into the roles of early-life factors in the development of islet autoimmunity and T1D in the Australian environment.

Trial registration number: ACTRN12613000794707.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
BMJ Open Diabetes Research & Care
BMJ Open Diabetes Research & Care Medicine-Endocrinology, Diabetes and Metabolism
CiteScore
9.30
自引率
2.40%
发文量
123
审稿时长
18 weeks
期刊介绍: BMJ Open Diabetes Research & Care is an open access journal committed to publishing high-quality, basic and clinical research articles regarding type 1 and type 2 diabetes, and associated complications. Only original content will be accepted, and submissions are subject to rigorous peer review to ensure the publication of high-quality — and evidence-based — original research articles.
期刊最新文献
Clinical utility of novel diabetes subgroups in predicting vascular complications and mortality: up to 25 years of follow-up of the HUNT Study. Association between RDW-SD and prognosis across glycemic status in patients with dilated cardiomyopathy. Widening the phenotypic spectrum caused by pathogenic PDX1 variants in individuals with neonatal diabetes. Identification of atypical pediatric diabetes mellitus cases using electronic medical records. Type 2 diabetes complications in ethnic minority compared with European host populations: a systematic review and meta-analysis.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1