远端心室起搏治疗药物难治性中腔阻塞性肥厚型心肌病:个性化起搏的随机安慰剂对照试验》。

IF 9.1 1区 医学 Q1 CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS Circulation. Arrhythmia and electrophysiology Pub Date : 2024-07-01 Epub Date: 2024-06-19 DOI:10.1161/CIRCEP.123.012570
James W Malcolmson, Rebecca K Hughes, Tim Husselbury, Kamran Khan, Annastazia E Learoyd, Martin Lees, Eleanor C Wicks, Jamie Smith, Alexander D Simms, James C Moon, Luis R Lopes, Constantinos O'Mahony, Neha Sekhri, Perry M Elliott, Steffen E Petersen, Mehul B Dhinoja, Saidi A Mohiddin
{"title":"远端心室起搏治疗药物难治性中腔阻塞性肥厚型心肌病:个性化起搏的随机安慰剂对照试验》。","authors":"James W Malcolmson, Rebecca K Hughes, Tim Husselbury, Kamran Khan, Annastazia E Learoyd, Martin Lees, Eleanor C Wicks, Jamie Smith, Alexander D Simms, James C Moon, Luis R Lopes, Constantinos O'Mahony, Neha Sekhri, Perry M Elliott, Steffen E Petersen, Mehul B Dhinoja, Saidi A Mohiddin","doi":"10.1161/CIRCEP.123.012570","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Patients with refractory, symptomatic left ventricular (LV) mid-cavity obstructive (LVMCO) hypertrophic cardiomyopathy have few therapeutic options. Right ventricular pacing is associated with modest hemodynamic and symptomatic improvement, and LV pacing pilot data suggest therapeutic potential. We hypothesized that site-specific pacing would reduce LVMCO gradients and improve symptoms.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Patients with symptomatic-drug-refractory LVMCO were recruited for a randomized, blinded trial of personalized prescription of pacing (PPoP). Multiple LV and apical right ventricular pacing sites were assessed during an invasive hemodynamic study of multisite pacing. Patient-specific pacing-site and atrioventricular delays, defining PPoP, were selected on the basis of LVMCO gradient reduction and acceptable pacing parameters. Patients were randomized to 6 months of active PPoP or backup pacing in a crossover design. The primary outcome examined invasive gradient change with best-site pacing. Secondary outcomes assessed quality of life and exercise following randomization to PPoP.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 17 patients were recruited; 16 of whom met primary end points. Baseline New York Heart Association was 3±0.6, despite optimal medical therapy. Hemodynamic effects were assessed during pacing at the right ventricular apex and at a mean of 8 LV sites. The gradients in all 16 patients fell with pacing, with maximum gradient reduction achieved via LV pacing in 14 (88%) patients and right ventricular apex in 2. The mean baseline gradient of 80±29 mm Hg fell to 31±21 mm Hg with best-site pacing, a 60% reduction (<i>P</i><0.0001). One cardiac vein perforation occurred in 1 case, and 15 subjects entered crossover; 2 withdrawals occurred during crossover. Of the 13 completing crossover, 9 (69%) chose active pacing in PPoP configuration as preferred setting. PPoP was associated with improved 6-minute walking test performance (328.5±99.9 versus 285.8±105.5 m; <i>P</i>=0.018); other outcome measures also indicated benefit with PPoP.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>In a randomized placebo-controlled trial, PPoP reduces obstruction and improves exercise performance in severely symptomatic patients with LVMCO.</p><p><strong>Registration: </strong>URL: https://clinicaltrials.gov/study; Unique Identifier: NCT03450252.</p>","PeriodicalId":10319,"journal":{"name":"Circulation. Arrhythmia and electrophysiology","volume":"17 7","pages":"e012570"},"PeriodicalIF":9.1000,"publicationDate":"2024-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Distal Ventricular Pacing for Drug-Refractory Mid-Cavity Obstructive Hypertrophic Cardiomyopathy: A Randomized, Placebo-Controlled Trial of Personalized Pacing.\",\"authors\":\"James W Malcolmson, Rebecca K Hughes, Tim Husselbury, Kamran Khan, Annastazia E Learoyd, Martin Lees, Eleanor C Wicks, Jamie Smith, Alexander D Simms, James C Moon, Luis R Lopes, Constantinos O'Mahony, Neha Sekhri, Perry M Elliott, Steffen E Petersen, Mehul B Dhinoja, Saidi A Mohiddin\",\"doi\":\"10.1161/CIRCEP.123.012570\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Patients with refractory, symptomatic left ventricular (LV) mid-cavity obstructive (LVMCO) hypertrophic cardiomyopathy have few therapeutic options. Right ventricular pacing is associated with modest hemodynamic and symptomatic improvement, and LV pacing pilot data suggest therapeutic potential. We hypothesized that site-specific pacing would reduce LVMCO gradients and improve symptoms.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Patients with symptomatic-drug-refractory LVMCO were recruited for a randomized, blinded trial of personalized prescription of pacing (PPoP). Multiple LV and apical right ventricular pacing sites were assessed during an invasive hemodynamic study of multisite pacing. Patient-specific pacing-site and atrioventricular delays, defining PPoP, were selected on the basis of LVMCO gradient reduction and acceptable pacing parameters. Patients were randomized to 6 months of active PPoP or backup pacing in a crossover design. The primary outcome examined invasive gradient change with best-site pacing. Secondary outcomes assessed quality of life and exercise following randomization to PPoP.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 17 patients were recruited; 16 of whom met primary end points. Baseline New York Heart Association was 3±0.6, despite optimal medical therapy. Hemodynamic effects were assessed during pacing at the right ventricular apex and at a mean of 8 LV sites. The gradients in all 16 patients fell with pacing, with maximum gradient reduction achieved via LV pacing in 14 (88%) patients and right ventricular apex in 2. The mean baseline gradient of 80±29 mm Hg fell to 31±21 mm Hg with best-site pacing, a 60% reduction (<i>P</i><0.0001). One cardiac vein perforation occurred in 1 case, and 15 subjects entered crossover; 2 withdrawals occurred during crossover. Of the 13 completing crossover, 9 (69%) chose active pacing in PPoP configuration as preferred setting. PPoP was associated with improved 6-minute walking test performance (328.5±99.9 versus 285.8±105.5 m; <i>P</i>=0.018); other outcome measures also indicated benefit with PPoP.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>In a randomized placebo-controlled trial, PPoP reduces obstruction and improves exercise performance in severely symptomatic patients with LVMCO.</p><p><strong>Registration: </strong>URL: https://clinicaltrials.gov/study; Unique Identifier: NCT03450252.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":10319,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Circulation. Arrhythmia and electrophysiology\",\"volume\":\"17 7\",\"pages\":\"e012570\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":9.1000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-07-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Circulation. Arrhythmia and electrophysiology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1161/CIRCEP.123.012570\",\"RegionNum\":1,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2024/6/19 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Circulation. Arrhythmia and electrophysiology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1161/CIRCEP.123.012570","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/6/19 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:难治性、有症状的左心室中腔梗阻性肥厚型心肌病患者几乎没有治疗选择。右心室起搏可适度改善血流动力学和症状,左心室起搏试验数据也显示出治疗潜力。我们假设特定部位起搏可降低 LVMCO 梯度并改善症状:方法:我们招募了有症状的药物难治性 LVMCO 患者,进行了个性化起搏处方(PPoP)的随机、盲法试验。在多部位起搏的有创血液动力学研究中,对多个左心室和右心室心尖起搏部位进行了评估。根据 LVMCO 梯度降低情况和可接受的起搏参数,选择患者特定的起搏点和房室延迟,定义 PPoP。在交叉设计中,患者随机接受为期 6 个月的主动 PPoP 或备用起搏。主要结果是检查最佳部位起搏的有创梯度变化。次要结果是评估随机使用 PPoP 后的生活质量和运动情况:共招募了 17 名患者,其中 16 人达到了主要终点。尽管接受了最佳的药物治疗,但基线纽约心脏协会指数为 3±0.6。在右心室心尖和平均 8 个左心室部位起搏时评估了血流动力学效应。通过最佳部位起搏,平均基线梯度(80±29 mm Hg)降至(31±21 mm Hg),降幅达 60%(PP=0.018);其他结果指标也显示 PPoP 有益:结论:在一项随机安慰剂对照试验中,PPoP可减少严重症状的左心室MCO患者的阻塞并改善其运动表现:URL: https://clinicaltrials.gov/study; Unique Identifier:NCT03450252。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Distal Ventricular Pacing for Drug-Refractory Mid-Cavity Obstructive Hypertrophic Cardiomyopathy: A Randomized, Placebo-Controlled Trial of Personalized Pacing.

Background: Patients with refractory, symptomatic left ventricular (LV) mid-cavity obstructive (LVMCO) hypertrophic cardiomyopathy have few therapeutic options. Right ventricular pacing is associated with modest hemodynamic and symptomatic improvement, and LV pacing pilot data suggest therapeutic potential. We hypothesized that site-specific pacing would reduce LVMCO gradients and improve symptoms.

Methods: Patients with symptomatic-drug-refractory LVMCO were recruited for a randomized, blinded trial of personalized prescription of pacing (PPoP). Multiple LV and apical right ventricular pacing sites were assessed during an invasive hemodynamic study of multisite pacing. Patient-specific pacing-site and atrioventricular delays, defining PPoP, were selected on the basis of LVMCO gradient reduction and acceptable pacing parameters. Patients were randomized to 6 months of active PPoP or backup pacing in a crossover design. The primary outcome examined invasive gradient change with best-site pacing. Secondary outcomes assessed quality of life and exercise following randomization to PPoP.

Results: A total of 17 patients were recruited; 16 of whom met primary end points. Baseline New York Heart Association was 3±0.6, despite optimal medical therapy. Hemodynamic effects were assessed during pacing at the right ventricular apex and at a mean of 8 LV sites. The gradients in all 16 patients fell with pacing, with maximum gradient reduction achieved via LV pacing in 14 (88%) patients and right ventricular apex in 2. The mean baseline gradient of 80±29 mm Hg fell to 31±21 mm Hg with best-site pacing, a 60% reduction (P<0.0001). One cardiac vein perforation occurred in 1 case, and 15 subjects entered crossover; 2 withdrawals occurred during crossover. Of the 13 completing crossover, 9 (69%) chose active pacing in PPoP configuration as preferred setting. PPoP was associated with improved 6-minute walking test performance (328.5±99.9 versus 285.8±105.5 m; P=0.018); other outcome measures also indicated benefit with PPoP.

Conclusions: In a randomized placebo-controlled trial, PPoP reduces obstruction and improves exercise performance in severely symptomatic patients with LVMCO.

Registration: URL: https://clinicaltrials.gov/study; Unique Identifier: NCT03450252.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
13.70
自引率
4.80%
发文量
187
审稿时长
4-8 weeks
期刊介绍: Circulation: Arrhythmia and Electrophysiology is a journal dedicated to the study and application of clinical cardiac electrophysiology. It covers a wide range of topics including the diagnosis and treatment of cardiac arrhythmias, as well as research in this field. The journal accepts various types of studies, including observational research, clinical trials, epidemiological studies, and advancements in translational research.
期刊最新文献
Exercise Training Improves Cognitive Function and Neurovascular Control: A Secondary Analysis of the Exercise Training in Heart Failure With Reduced Ejection Fraction and Permanent Atrial Fibrillation: A Randomized Clinical Trial. Resuscitated Sudden Cardiac Arrest as the Initial Presentation of Hypertrophic Cardiomyopathy. Impact of Being Underweight on the Safety and Efficacy of Atrial Fibrillation Ablation: An Analysis From the Japanese Catheter Ablation Registry. Multicenter Hemodynamic Assessment of the LOT-CRT Strategy: When Does Combining Left Bundle Branch Pacing and Coronary Venous Pacing Enhance Resynchronization?: Primary Results of the CSPOT Study. Performance of Atrial Fibrillation Burden Trends for Stroke Risk Stratification.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1