通过手机调查识别重症监护病房患者父母/监护人心理健康症状的可行性和可接受性。

IF 4 2区 医学 Q1 CRITICAL CARE MEDICINE Pediatric Critical Care Medicine Pub Date : 2024-10-01 Epub Date: 2024-07-17 DOI:10.1097/PCC.0000000000003573
Leya Saju, Mallory B Smith, Elizabeth Ainsworth, Jessica M Goldberg, Daniel J Chertow, Mary E Hartman
{"title":"通过手机调查识别重症监护病房患者父母/监护人心理健康症状的可行性和可接受性。","authors":"Leya Saju, Mallory B Smith, Elizabeth Ainsworth, Jessica M Goldberg, Daniel J Chertow, Mary E Hartman","doi":"10.1097/PCC.0000000000003573","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>Parents experience psychologic distress during their child's admission to a PICU, but effective screening for parental mental health symptoms is not the standard of care. We aimed to test the feasibility and acceptability of a mobile phone-based mental health survey for parents/guardians of PICU patients to facilitate their support by the PICU team.</p><p><strong>Design: </strong>Post hoc analysis of a single-institution pilot study conducted in 2022. Mental health surveys were delivered by text message to parents/guardians of PICU patients over 1 month, beginning 3 days after their child's PICU admission. In-person interviews 1 month after hospital discharge were used to solicit participants' opinions on the survey platform and content.</p><p><strong>Setting: </strong>A quaternary U.S. academic medical center.</p><p><strong>Participants: </strong>Parents/guardians of PICU patients.</p><p><strong>Interventions: </strong>None.</p><p><strong>Measurement and main results: </strong>Of the 53 participants who consented, 31 (58%) completed the study. Symptoms of acute stress (ASS) were the most common and most severe: 21 participants screened positive for ASS, and 20 of those that screened positive had \"moderate\" or \"severe\" symptoms. Among the 23 participants who screened positive for one mental health condition, 10 met the thresholds for all three. Scoring of the protocol's usability, acceptability, and feasibility showed a System Usability Scale equal to 82 of 100, an Acceptability of Intervention Measure score equal to 4.2 of 5, an Intervention Appropriateness Measure score equal to 4.5 of 5, and Feasibility of Intervention Measure score equal to 4.5 of 5.</p><p><strong>Conclusions and relevance: </strong>Mobile phone-based screening for parental mental health symptoms is acceptable and may offer the advantage of privacy and flexibility.</p>","PeriodicalId":19760,"journal":{"name":"Pediatric Critical Care Medicine","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":4.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Feasibility and Acceptability of Mobile Phone-Based Surveys to Identify Mental Health Symptoms in Parents/Guardians of PICU Patients.\",\"authors\":\"Leya Saju, Mallory B Smith, Elizabeth Ainsworth, Jessica M Goldberg, Daniel J Chertow, Mary E Hartman\",\"doi\":\"10.1097/PCC.0000000000003573\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>Parents experience psychologic distress during their child's admission to a PICU, but effective screening for parental mental health symptoms is not the standard of care. We aimed to test the feasibility and acceptability of a mobile phone-based mental health survey for parents/guardians of PICU patients to facilitate their support by the PICU team.</p><p><strong>Design: </strong>Post hoc analysis of a single-institution pilot study conducted in 2022. Mental health surveys were delivered by text message to parents/guardians of PICU patients over 1 month, beginning 3 days after their child's PICU admission. In-person interviews 1 month after hospital discharge were used to solicit participants' opinions on the survey platform and content.</p><p><strong>Setting: </strong>A quaternary U.S. academic medical center.</p><p><strong>Participants: </strong>Parents/guardians of PICU patients.</p><p><strong>Interventions: </strong>None.</p><p><strong>Measurement and main results: </strong>Of the 53 participants who consented, 31 (58%) completed the study. Symptoms of acute stress (ASS) were the most common and most severe: 21 participants screened positive for ASS, and 20 of those that screened positive had \\\"moderate\\\" or \\\"severe\\\" symptoms. Among the 23 participants who screened positive for one mental health condition, 10 met the thresholds for all three. Scoring of the protocol's usability, acceptability, and feasibility showed a System Usability Scale equal to 82 of 100, an Acceptability of Intervention Measure score equal to 4.2 of 5, an Intervention Appropriateness Measure score equal to 4.5 of 5, and Feasibility of Intervention Measure score equal to 4.5 of 5.</p><p><strong>Conclusions and relevance: </strong>Mobile phone-based screening for parental mental health symptoms is acceptable and may offer the advantage of privacy and flexibility.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":19760,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Pediatric Critical Care Medicine\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":4.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-10-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Pediatric Critical Care Medicine\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1097/PCC.0000000000003573\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2024/7/17 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"CRITICAL CARE MEDICINE\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Pediatric Critical Care Medicine","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1097/PCC.0000000000003573","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/7/17 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"CRITICAL CARE MEDICINE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的:在儿童入住 PICU 期间,家长会经历心理困扰,但有效筛查家长心理健康症状并非护理标准。我们旨在测试针对 PICU 患者父母/监护人的手机心理健康调查的可行性和可接受性,以促进 PICU 团队对他们的支持:设计:对2022年开展的一项单一机构试点研究进行事后分析。从 PICU 患者入院 3 天后开始,通过短信向其父母/监护人发送心理健康调查,历时 1 个月。出院一个月后进行面对面访谈,征求参与者对调查平台和内容的意见:地点:美国一家四级学术医疗中心:干预措施:无:测量和主要结果在 53 名同意参与研究的参与者中,31 人(58%)完成了研究。急性应激症状(ASS)是最常见也是最严重的症状:21 名参与者的 ASS 筛查呈阳性,其中 20 人的症状为 "中度 "或 "重度"。在 23 名一种精神健康状况呈阳性的参与者中,有 10 人达到了三种精神健康状况的临界值。对该方案的可用性、可接受性和可行性进行的评分显示,系统可用性评分为 82 分(满分 100 分),干预措施可接受性评分为 4.2 分(满分 5 分),干预措施适当性评分为 4.5 分(满分 5 分),干预措施可行性评分为 4.5 分(满分 5 分):通过手机筛查父母的精神健康症状是可以接受的,并且具有隐私性和灵活性的优势。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Feasibility and Acceptability of Mobile Phone-Based Surveys to Identify Mental Health Symptoms in Parents/Guardians of PICU Patients.

Objective: Parents experience psychologic distress during their child's admission to a PICU, but effective screening for parental mental health symptoms is not the standard of care. We aimed to test the feasibility and acceptability of a mobile phone-based mental health survey for parents/guardians of PICU patients to facilitate their support by the PICU team.

Design: Post hoc analysis of a single-institution pilot study conducted in 2022. Mental health surveys were delivered by text message to parents/guardians of PICU patients over 1 month, beginning 3 days after their child's PICU admission. In-person interviews 1 month after hospital discharge were used to solicit participants' opinions on the survey platform and content.

Setting: A quaternary U.S. academic medical center.

Participants: Parents/guardians of PICU patients.

Interventions: None.

Measurement and main results: Of the 53 participants who consented, 31 (58%) completed the study. Symptoms of acute stress (ASS) were the most common and most severe: 21 participants screened positive for ASS, and 20 of those that screened positive had "moderate" or "severe" symptoms. Among the 23 participants who screened positive for one mental health condition, 10 met the thresholds for all three. Scoring of the protocol's usability, acceptability, and feasibility showed a System Usability Scale equal to 82 of 100, an Acceptability of Intervention Measure score equal to 4.2 of 5, an Intervention Appropriateness Measure score equal to 4.5 of 5, and Feasibility of Intervention Measure score equal to 4.5 of 5.

Conclusions and relevance: Mobile phone-based screening for parental mental health symptoms is acceptable and may offer the advantage of privacy and flexibility.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Pediatric Critical Care Medicine
Pediatric Critical Care Medicine 医学-危重病医学
CiteScore
7.40
自引率
14.60%
发文量
991
审稿时长
3-8 weeks
期刊介绍: Pediatric Critical Care Medicine is written for the entire critical care team: pediatricians, neonatologists, respiratory therapists, nurses, and others who deal with pediatric patients who are critically ill or injured. International in scope, with editorial board members and contributors from around the world, the Journal includes a full range of scientific content, including clinical articles, scientific investigations, solicited reviews, and abstracts from pediatric critical care meetings. Additionally, the Journal includes abstracts of selected articles published in Chinese, French, Italian, Japanese, Portuguese, and Spanish translations - making news of advances in the field available to pediatric and neonatal intensive care practitioners worldwide.
期刊最新文献
The 2024 Pediatric Sepsis Challenge: Predicting In-Hospital Mortality in Children With Suspected Sepsis in Uganda. The Power of Goodbyes. Evolution and Impact of a Diagnostic Point-of-Care Ultrasound Program in a PICU. Evaluation of a Comprehensive Algorithm for PICU Patients With New Fever or Instability: Association of Clinical Decision Support With Testing Practices. Pediatric Hematology and Oncology Patients on Extracorporeal Membrane Oxygenation: Outcomes in a Multicenter, Retrospective Cohort, 2009-2021.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1