Seung Duk Lee, Kush Savsani, Sarah Ziqi Wang, Chandra Bhati, Yuzuru Sambommatsu, Daisuke Imai, Aamir Khan, Irfan Saeed, Amit Sharma, Vinay Kumaran, Adrian Cotterell, Marlon Levy, David A. Bruno
{"title":"机器人与开放式小切口活体供体肾切除术：单中心经验。","authors":"Seung Duk Lee, Kush Savsani, Sarah Ziqi Wang, Chandra Bhati, Yuzuru Sambommatsu, Daisuke Imai, Aamir Khan, Irfan Saeed, Amit Sharma, Vinay Kumaran, Adrian Cotterell, Marlon Levy, David A. Bruno","doi":"10.1002/rcs.2658","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div>\n \n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Background</h3>\n \n <p>Robotic surgery is associated with less tissue manipulation and earlier recovery with minimal incision. The aim of this study was to compare the short-term clinical outcomes between robotic-assisted donor nephrectomy (RDN) and open mini-incision donor nephrectomy (ODN).</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Methods</h3>\n \n <p>From 2016 to 2019, 141 cases involving RDN were analysed. Patient outcomes were compared with those of 191 patients who underwent ODN from 2010 to 2015. Demographics, operation factors, perioperative outcomes, and complications were retrospectively reviewed.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Results</h3>\n \n <p>The RDN group presented with less blood loss than the ODN group (<i>p</i> = 0.023). The length of hospital stay was significantly shorter in the RDN group than in the ODN group (<i>p</i> < 0.005). The overall rate of complications was low and there was no significant difference in complication rates between the groups.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Conclusion</h3>\n \n <p>The robotic approach has benefits over the traditional open approach, including shorter length of hospital stay and reduced intraoperative blood loss.</p>\n </section>\n </div>","PeriodicalId":50311,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Medical Robotics and Computer Assisted Surgery","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":2.3000,"publicationDate":"2024-07-16","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1002/rcs.2658","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Robotic versus open mini-incision living donor nephrectomy: Single centre experience\",\"authors\":\"Seung Duk Lee, Kush Savsani, Sarah Ziqi Wang, Chandra Bhati, Yuzuru Sambommatsu, Daisuke Imai, Aamir Khan, Irfan Saeed, Amit Sharma, Vinay Kumaran, Adrian Cotterell, Marlon Levy, David A. Bruno\",\"doi\":\"10.1002/rcs.2658\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div>\\n \\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Background</h3>\\n \\n <p>Robotic surgery is associated with less tissue manipulation and earlier recovery with minimal incision. The aim of this study was to compare the short-term clinical outcomes between robotic-assisted donor nephrectomy (RDN) and open mini-incision donor nephrectomy (ODN).</p>\\n </section>\\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Methods</h3>\\n \\n <p>From 2016 to 2019, 141 cases involving RDN were analysed. Patient outcomes were compared with those of 191 patients who underwent ODN from 2010 to 2015. Demographics, operation factors, perioperative outcomes, and complications were retrospectively reviewed.</p>\\n </section>\\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Results</h3>\\n \\n <p>The RDN group presented with less blood loss than the ODN group (<i>p</i> = 0.023). The length of hospital stay was significantly shorter in the RDN group than in the ODN group (<i>p</i> < 0.005). The overall rate of complications was low and there was no significant difference in complication rates between the groups.</p>\\n </section>\\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Conclusion</h3>\\n \\n <p>The robotic approach has benefits over the traditional open approach, including shorter length of hospital stay and reduced intraoperative blood loss.</p>\\n </section>\\n </div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":50311,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"International Journal of Medical Robotics and Computer Assisted Surgery\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.3000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-07-16\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1002/rcs.2658\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"International Journal of Medical Robotics and Computer Assisted Surgery\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/rcs.2658\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"SURGERY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal of Medical Robotics and Computer Assisted Surgery","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/rcs.2658","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"SURGERY","Score":null,"Total":0}
Robotic versus open mini-incision living donor nephrectomy: Single centre experience
Background
Robotic surgery is associated with less tissue manipulation and earlier recovery with minimal incision. The aim of this study was to compare the short-term clinical outcomes between robotic-assisted donor nephrectomy (RDN) and open mini-incision donor nephrectomy (ODN).
Methods
From 2016 to 2019, 141 cases involving RDN were analysed. Patient outcomes were compared with those of 191 patients who underwent ODN from 2010 to 2015. Demographics, operation factors, perioperative outcomes, and complications were retrospectively reviewed.
Results
The RDN group presented with less blood loss than the ODN group (p = 0.023). The length of hospital stay was significantly shorter in the RDN group than in the ODN group (p < 0.005). The overall rate of complications was low and there was no significant difference in complication rates between the groups.
Conclusion
The robotic approach has benefits over the traditional open approach, including shorter length of hospital stay and reduced intraoperative blood loss.
期刊介绍：
The International Journal of Medical Robotics and Computer Assisted Surgery provides a cross-disciplinary platform for presenting the latest developments in robotics and computer assisted technologies for medical applications. The journal publishes cutting-edge papers and expert reviews, complemented by commentaries, correspondence and conference highlights that stimulate discussion and exchange of ideas. Areas of interest include robotic surgery aids and systems, operative planning tools, medical imaging and visualisation, simulation and navigation, virtual reality, intuitive command and control systems, haptics and sensor technologies. In addition to research and surgical planning studies, the journal welcomes papers detailing clinical trials and applications of computer-assisted workflows and robotic systems in neurosurgery, urology, paediatric, orthopaedic, craniofacial, cardiovascular, thoraco-abdominal, musculoskeletal and visceral surgery. Articles providing critical analysis of clinical trials, assessment of the benefits and risks of the application of these technologies, commenting on ease of use, or addressing surgical education and training issues are also encouraged. The journal aims to foster a community that encompasses medical practitioners, researchers, and engineers and computer scientists developing robotic systems and computational tools in academic and commercial environments, with the intention of promoting and developing these exciting areas of medical technology.
京公网安备 11010802042870号
京ICP备2023020795号-1
分享
求助内容：
应助结果提醒方式：
扫码关注我们
