富血小板血浆在治疗肋骨骨折中的疗效。

Yi-Han Lin, Han-Shui Hsu
{"title":"富血小板血浆在治疗肋骨骨折中的疗效。","authors":"Yi-Han Lin, Han-Shui Hsu","doi":"10.1097/JCMA.0000000000001136","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>This study aimed to investigate the therapeutic efficacy of platelet-rich plasma (PRP) therapy in patients with rib fractures.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This study retrospectively collected data from patients with acute rib fractures at Ming-Sheng General Hospital from 2020 to 2022 and excluded those who underwent surgical intervention or with severe extrathoracic injuries. PRP was extracted using the patient's blood and injected via ultrasound guidance near the fracture site. Patients self-assessed pain levels and medication usage at 0, 1, 2, 4, and 8 weeks. Pulmonary function tests were conducted at 4 weeks.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>This study included 255 patients, with 160 and 95 patients in the conservative (only pain medications administered) and PRP groups (PRP and analgesics administered), respectively. The PRP group reported lower pain levels than the conservative group at 2 and 4 weeks. No substantial differences in medication usage were observed between the groups. The PRP group demonstrated lower pain levels and medication usage than the conservative group in severe rib fractures (≥3 ribs) and better lung function improvement at 4 weeks. After propensity score matching, the PRP group still had a better treatment outcome in pain control and lung function recovery.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>PRP demonstrated considerable therapeutic efficacy in patients with severe rib fractures, resulting in reduced pain, decreased medication usage, and improved lung function but with no substantial benefits in patients with mild rib fractures.</p>","PeriodicalId":94115,"journal":{"name":"Journal of the Chinese Medical Association : JCMA","volume":" ","pages":"854-860"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Therapeutic efficacy of platelet-rich plasma in the management of rib fractures.\",\"authors\":\"Yi-Han Lin, Han-Shui Hsu\",\"doi\":\"10.1097/JCMA.0000000000001136\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>This study aimed to investigate the therapeutic efficacy of platelet-rich plasma (PRP) therapy in patients with rib fractures.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This study retrospectively collected data from patients with acute rib fractures at Ming-Sheng General Hospital from 2020 to 2022 and excluded those who underwent surgical intervention or with severe extrathoracic injuries. PRP was extracted using the patient's blood and injected via ultrasound guidance near the fracture site. Patients self-assessed pain levels and medication usage at 0, 1, 2, 4, and 8 weeks. Pulmonary function tests were conducted at 4 weeks.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>This study included 255 patients, with 160 and 95 patients in the conservative (only pain medications administered) and PRP groups (PRP and analgesics administered), respectively. The PRP group reported lower pain levels than the conservative group at 2 and 4 weeks. No substantial differences in medication usage were observed between the groups. The PRP group demonstrated lower pain levels and medication usage than the conservative group in severe rib fractures (≥3 ribs) and better lung function improvement at 4 weeks. After propensity score matching, the PRP group still had a better treatment outcome in pain control and lung function recovery.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>PRP demonstrated considerable therapeutic efficacy in patients with severe rib fractures, resulting in reduced pain, decreased medication usage, and improved lung function but with no substantial benefits in patients with mild rib fractures.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":94115,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of the Chinese Medical Association : JCMA\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"854-860\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-09-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of the Chinese Medical Association : JCMA\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1097/JCMA.0000000000001136\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2024/7/15 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of the Chinese Medical Association : JCMA","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1097/JCMA.0000000000001136","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/7/15 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:本研究旨在探讨富血小板血浆(PRP)疗法对肋骨骨折患者的疗效:本研究旨在探讨富血小板血浆(PRP)治疗肋骨骨折患者的疗效:本研究回顾性收集了明升综合医院 2020 年至 2022 年急性肋骨骨折患者的数据,排除了接受手术治疗或严重胸外损伤的患者。研究使用患者的血液提取 PRP,并通过超声引导在骨折部位附近注射。患者在 0、1、2、4 和 8 周时对疼痛程度和用药情况进行自我评估。4周时进行肺功能测试:这项研究包括 255 名患者,其中保守组(仅使用止痛药)和 PRP 组(使用 PRP 和止痛药)分别有 160 名和 95 名患者。在 2 周和 4 周时,PRP 组的疼痛程度低于保守治疗组。两组在用药方面没有明显差异。在严重肋骨骨折(≥3 根肋骨)患者中,PRP 组的疼痛程度和用药量大大低于保守治疗组,并且在 4 周时肺功能有所改善。经过倾向评分匹配后,PRP 组在疼痛控制和肺功能恢复方面仍有更好的治疗效果:结论:PRP 对严重肋骨骨折患者具有显著疗效,可减轻疼痛、减少用药量并改善肺功能,但对轻度肋骨骨折患者无实质性益处。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Therapeutic efficacy of platelet-rich plasma in the management of rib fractures.

Background: This study aimed to investigate the therapeutic efficacy of platelet-rich plasma (PRP) therapy in patients with rib fractures.

Methods: This study retrospectively collected data from patients with acute rib fractures at Ming-Sheng General Hospital from 2020 to 2022 and excluded those who underwent surgical intervention or with severe extrathoracic injuries. PRP was extracted using the patient's blood and injected via ultrasound guidance near the fracture site. Patients self-assessed pain levels and medication usage at 0, 1, 2, 4, and 8 weeks. Pulmonary function tests were conducted at 4 weeks.

Results: This study included 255 patients, with 160 and 95 patients in the conservative (only pain medications administered) and PRP groups (PRP and analgesics administered), respectively. The PRP group reported lower pain levels than the conservative group at 2 and 4 weeks. No substantial differences in medication usage were observed between the groups. The PRP group demonstrated lower pain levels and medication usage than the conservative group in severe rib fractures (≥3 ribs) and better lung function improvement at 4 weeks. After propensity score matching, the PRP group still had a better treatment outcome in pain control and lung function recovery.

Conclusion: PRP demonstrated considerable therapeutic efficacy in patients with severe rib fractures, resulting in reduced pain, decreased medication usage, and improved lung function but with no substantial benefits in patients with mild rib fractures.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Epidemiology and practice patterns of achalasia in Taiwan: A nationwide population-based cohort study. Real‑world therapeutic strategies and survival outcomes in advanced HER2-mutant non-small cell lung cancer. Insufficient pretransplant induction therapy is associated with diffuse intrahepatic cholangiopathy in ABO-incompatible living donor liver transplantation for acute liver failure. Two novel SNPs Rs1736952 and Rs17354984 are highly associated with uveitis in ankylosing spondylitis. Feasibility and safety of Taipei Veterans General Hospital Heavy Ion Therapy Center: The first carbon-ion irradiation facility in Taiwan.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1