一项第 4 期随机对照临床研究,比较缓释型普瑞巴林与速释型普瑞巴林对患有外周神经病理性疼痛的 2 型糖尿病患者的疗效和安全性

IF 2.9 3区 医学 Q3 ENDOCRINOLOGY & METABOLISM Journal of diabetes and its complications Pub Date : 2024-07-14 DOI:10.1016/j.jdiacomp.2024.108809
Kyong Hye Joung , Tae Nyun Kim , Eu Jeong Ku , Seong Su Lee , Won Sang Yoo , Kang Seo Park , Su Kyoung Kwon , Bon Jeong Ku
{"title":"一项第 4 期随机对照临床研究,比较缓释型普瑞巴林与速释型普瑞巴林对患有外周神经病理性疼痛的 2 型糖尿病患者的疗效和安全性","authors":"Kyong Hye Joung ,&nbsp;Tae Nyun Kim ,&nbsp;Eu Jeong Ku ,&nbsp;Seong Su Lee ,&nbsp;Won Sang Yoo ,&nbsp;Kang Seo Park ,&nbsp;Su Kyoung Kwon ,&nbsp;Bon Jeong Ku","doi":"10.1016/j.jdiacomp.2024.108809","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Aims</h3><p>The objective of this study was to demonstrate that sustained-release (SR) pregabalin is non-inferior to immediate-release (IR) pregabalin in attenuating diabetic peripheral neuropathic (DPN) pain along with patient satisfaction and compliance.</p></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><p>This was an 8-week, randomized, active-controlled, open-label, phase 4 study. Eligible subjects who had been on IR pregabalin for 4 weeks were randomized to 1:1 ratio to either continue with twice-daily IR pregabalin (75 mg), or to switch to once-daily SR pregabalin (150 mg). Primary efficacy endpoint was the change in visual analogue scale (VAS) scores after 8 weeks of treatment compared to baseline in both SR and IR pregabalin groups.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>Among 130 randomized subjects, 125 patients were included in full analysis set. For the change in VAS pain score, the least squares (LS) mean were −17.95 (SR pregabalin) and −18.74 (IR pregabalin) and the LS mean difference between both groups was 0.79, with the upper limit of the 95 % confidence interval [−5.99, 7.58] below the pre-specified non-inferiority margin of 9.2 mm.</p></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><p>This study demonstrates that the new once-daily SR pregabalin formulation is not different to the twice-daily IR pregabalin in alleviating DPN pain, indicating its potential as a promising treatment for DPN pain with a comparable safety profile.</p></div><div><h3>Trial registration</h3><p><span><span>ClinicalTrials.gov</span><svg><path></path></svg></span>, <span><span>NCT05624853</span><svg><path></path></svg></span>.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":15659,"journal":{"name":"Journal of diabetes and its complications","volume":"38 8","pages":"Article 108809"},"PeriodicalIF":2.9000,"publicationDate":"2024-07-14","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"A phase 4 randomized active-controlled clinical study to compare the efficacy and safety of sustained-release pregabalin with immediate-release pregabalin in type 2 diabetic patients with peripheral neuropathic pain\",\"authors\":\"Kyong Hye Joung ,&nbsp;Tae Nyun Kim ,&nbsp;Eu Jeong Ku ,&nbsp;Seong Su Lee ,&nbsp;Won Sang Yoo ,&nbsp;Kang Seo Park ,&nbsp;Su Kyoung Kwon ,&nbsp;Bon Jeong Ku\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.jdiacomp.2024.108809\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><h3>Aims</h3><p>The objective of this study was to demonstrate that sustained-release (SR) pregabalin is non-inferior to immediate-release (IR) pregabalin in attenuating diabetic peripheral neuropathic (DPN) pain along with patient satisfaction and compliance.</p></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><p>This was an 8-week, randomized, active-controlled, open-label, phase 4 study. Eligible subjects who had been on IR pregabalin for 4 weeks were randomized to 1:1 ratio to either continue with twice-daily IR pregabalin (75 mg), or to switch to once-daily SR pregabalin (150 mg). Primary efficacy endpoint was the change in visual analogue scale (VAS) scores after 8 weeks of treatment compared to baseline in both SR and IR pregabalin groups.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>Among 130 randomized subjects, 125 patients were included in full analysis set. For the change in VAS pain score, the least squares (LS) mean were −17.95 (SR pregabalin) and −18.74 (IR pregabalin) and the LS mean difference between both groups was 0.79, with the upper limit of the 95 % confidence interval [−5.99, 7.58] below the pre-specified non-inferiority margin of 9.2 mm.</p></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><p>This study demonstrates that the new once-daily SR pregabalin formulation is not different to the twice-daily IR pregabalin in alleviating DPN pain, indicating its potential as a promising treatment for DPN pain with a comparable safety profile.</p></div><div><h3>Trial registration</h3><p><span><span>ClinicalTrials.gov</span><svg><path></path></svg></span>, <span><span>NCT05624853</span><svg><path></path></svg></span>.</p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":15659,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of diabetes and its complications\",\"volume\":\"38 8\",\"pages\":\"Article 108809\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.9000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-07-14\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of diabetes and its complications\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1056872724001351\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"ENDOCRINOLOGY & METABOLISM\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of diabetes and its complications","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1056872724001351","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"ENDOCRINOLOGY & METABOLISM","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的本研究旨在证明缓释(SR)普瑞巴林在减轻糖尿病周围神经病理性(DPN)疼痛以及患者满意度和依从性方面不劣于速释(IR)普瑞巴林。符合条件的受试者已服用红外普瑞巴林 4 周,按照 1:1 的比例随机分配,要么继续服用每日两次的红外普瑞巴林(75 毫克),要么改用每日一次的 SR 普瑞巴林(150 毫克)。主要疗效终点是SR组和IR普瑞巴林组治疗8周后视觉模拟量表(VAS)评分与基线相比的变化。VAS疼痛评分变化的最小二乘法(LS)均值分别为-17.95(SR普瑞巴林)和-18.74(IR普瑞巴林),两组间的LS均值差为0.79,95%置信区间的上限[-5.99, 7.58]低于9.2毫米的预设非劣效边距。结论本研究表明,每日一次的SR普瑞巴林新制剂在缓解DPN疼痛方面与每日两次的IR普瑞巴林没有差异,这表明它有可能成为一种治疗DPN疼痛的有前途的药物,且安全性相当。试验注册ClinicalTrials.gov,NCT05624853。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
A phase 4 randomized active-controlled clinical study to compare the efficacy and safety of sustained-release pregabalin with immediate-release pregabalin in type 2 diabetic patients with peripheral neuropathic pain

Aims

The objective of this study was to demonstrate that sustained-release (SR) pregabalin is non-inferior to immediate-release (IR) pregabalin in attenuating diabetic peripheral neuropathic (DPN) pain along with patient satisfaction and compliance.

Methods

This was an 8-week, randomized, active-controlled, open-label, phase 4 study. Eligible subjects who had been on IR pregabalin for 4 weeks were randomized to 1:1 ratio to either continue with twice-daily IR pregabalin (75 mg), or to switch to once-daily SR pregabalin (150 mg). Primary efficacy endpoint was the change in visual analogue scale (VAS) scores after 8 weeks of treatment compared to baseline in both SR and IR pregabalin groups.

Results

Among 130 randomized subjects, 125 patients were included in full analysis set. For the change in VAS pain score, the least squares (LS) mean were −17.95 (SR pregabalin) and −18.74 (IR pregabalin) and the LS mean difference between both groups was 0.79, with the upper limit of the 95 % confidence interval [−5.99, 7.58] below the pre-specified non-inferiority margin of 9.2 mm.

Conclusions

This study demonstrates that the new once-daily SR pregabalin formulation is not different to the twice-daily IR pregabalin in alleviating DPN pain, indicating its potential as a promising treatment for DPN pain with a comparable safety profile.

Trial registration

ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT05624853.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of diabetes and its complications
Journal of diabetes and its complications 医学-内分泌学与代谢
CiteScore
5.90
自引率
3.30%
发文量
153
审稿时长
16 days
期刊介绍: Journal of Diabetes and Its Complications (JDC) is a journal for health care practitioners and researchers, that publishes original research about the pathogenesis, diagnosis and management of diabetes mellitus and its complications. JDC also publishes articles on physiological and molecular aspects of glucose homeostasis. The primary purpose of JDC is to act as a source of information usable by diabetes practitioners and researchers to increase their knowledge about mechanisms of diabetes and complications development, and promote better management of people with diabetes who are at risk for those complications. Manuscripts submitted to JDC can report any aspect of basic, translational or clinical research as well as epidemiology. Topics can range broadly from early prediabetes to late-stage complicated diabetes. Topics relevant to basic/translational reports include pancreatic islet dysfunction and insulin resistance, altered adipose tissue function in diabetes, altered neuronal control of glucose homeostasis and mechanisms of drug action. Topics relevant to diabetic complications include diabetic retinopathy, neuropathy and nephropathy; peripheral vascular disease and coronary heart disease; gastrointestinal disorders, renal failure and impotence; and hypertension and hyperlipidemia.
期刊最新文献
Slowly progressive subtype of childhood-onset type 1 diabetes as a high-risk factor for end-stage renal disease: A cohort study in Japan Prognostic importance of baseline and changes in serum uric acid for macro/microvascular and mortality outcomes in individuals with type 2 diabetes: The Rio de Janeiro type 2 diabetes cohort Contents/Barcode Dapagliflozin improves the dysfunction of human umbilical vein endothelial cells (HUVECs) by downregulating high glucose/high fat-induced autophagy through inhibiting SGLT-2 Diabetic macular edema: Variations in observations with intensive treatment optimizing glycemia
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1