Fergus Haswell , Oreane Y. Edelenbosch , Laura Piscicelli , Detlef P. van Vuuren
{"title":"循环使命的地域性:全球北方和全球南方循环经济政策方法的跨国比较","authors":"Fergus Haswell , Oreane Y. Edelenbosch , Laura Piscicelli , Detlef P. van Vuuren","doi":"10.1016/j.eist.2024.100883","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>The Circular Economy (CE) is promoted as a sustainable model of economic growth and a quintessential example of a “sustainability mission.” Despite expected co-benefits in job creation, waste reduction and poverty alleviation, the Global South is largely missing from both missions and CE literature. Employing cross-disciplinary insights from environmental policy and the geography of sustainability transitions, this paper documents the diffusion of CE missions and compares CE policy development between the Global North and Global South. Analysing 61 national-level CE strategic policy documents, we focus on the policy levers, CE strategies, materials and sectors. We show that CE mission development is widespread in the Global North and developing in the Global South. Despite linkages to other national-level social and sustainability agendas, CE policy instrument choice shows limited place-sensitivity and geographical variation. Where the Global South is replicating the Global North's CE trajectory, the transformative potential of circularity missions is threatened.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":54294,"journal":{"name":"Environmental Innovation and Societal Transitions","volume":"52 ","pages":"Article 100883"},"PeriodicalIF":5.7000,"publicationDate":"2024-07-16","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S221042242400073X/pdfft?md5=4c5aa7eb1f901fa80541f0028f806025&pid=1-s2.0-S221042242400073X-main.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"The geography of circularity missions: A cross-country comparison of circular economy policy approaches in the Global North and Global South\",\"authors\":\"Fergus Haswell , Oreane Y. Edelenbosch , Laura Piscicelli , Detlef P. van Vuuren\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.eist.2024.100883\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><p>The Circular Economy (CE) is promoted as a sustainable model of economic growth and a quintessential example of a “sustainability mission.” Despite expected co-benefits in job creation, waste reduction and poverty alleviation, the Global South is largely missing from both missions and CE literature. Employing cross-disciplinary insights from environmental policy and the geography of sustainability transitions, this paper documents the diffusion of CE missions and compares CE policy development between the Global North and Global South. Analysing 61 national-level CE strategic policy documents, we focus on the policy levers, CE strategies, materials and sectors. We show that CE mission development is widespread in the Global North and developing in the Global South. Despite linkages to other national-level social and sustainability agendas, CE policy instrument choice shows limited place-sensitivity and geographical variation. Where the Global South is replicating the Global North's CE trajectory, the transformative potential of circularity missions is threatened.</p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":54294,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Environmental Innovation and Societal Transitions\",\"volume\":\"52 \",\"pages\":\"Article 100883\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":5.7000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-07-16\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S221042242400073X/pdfft?md5=4c5aa7eb1f901fa80541f0028f806025&pid=1-s2.0-S221042242400073X-main.pdf\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Environmental Innovation and Societal Transitions\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"93\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S221042242400073X\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"经济学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Environmental Innovation and Societal Transitions","FirstCategoryId":"93","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S221042242400073X","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"经济学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
摘要
循环经济(CE)被作为一种可持续的经济增长模式和 "可持续性使命 "的典型范例加以推广。尽管循环经济在创造就业、减少废物和减轻贫困方面具有预期的共同效益,但全球南部地区在循环经济使命和循环经济文献中却基本缺席。本文运用环境政策和可持续发展转型地理学的跨学科见解,记录了可持续发展使命的传播情况,并比较了全球北方和全球南方的可持续发展政策发展情况。我们分析了 61 份国家级行政首长协调会战略政策文件,重点关注政策杠杆、行政首长协调会战略、材料和部门。我们发现,在全球北方,行政首长协调会的发展非常普遍,而在全球南方,行政首长协调会的发展还在不断发展。尽管与其他国家级社会和可持续发展议程有联系,但行政首长协调会的政策工具选择显示出有限的地方敏感性和地域差异。在全球南部正在复制全球北部的 CE 轨迹的地方,循环使命的变革潜力受到了威胁。
The geography of circularity missions: A cross-country comparison of circular economy policy approaches in the Global North and Global South
The Circular Economy (CE) is promoted as a sustainable model of economic growth and a quintessential example of a “sustainability mission.” Despite expected co-benefits in job creation, waste reduction and poverty alleviation, the Global South is largely missing from both missions and CE literature. Employing cross-disciplinary insights from environmental policy and the geography of sustainability transitions, this paper documents the diffusion of CE missions and compares CE policy development between the Global North and Global South. Analysing 61 national-level CE strategic policy documents, we focus on the policy levers, CE strategies, materials and sectors. We show that CE mission development is widespread in the Global North and developing in the Global South. Despite linkages to other national-level social and sustainability agendas, CE policy instrument choice shows limited place-sensitivity and geographical variation. Where the Global South is replicating the Global North's CE trajectory, the transformative potential of circularity missions is threatened.
期刊介绍:
Environmental Innovation and Societal Transitions serves as a platform for reporting studies on innovations and socio-economic transitions aimed at fostering an environmentally sustainable economy, thereby addressing structural resource scarcity and environmental challenges, particularly those associated with fossil energy use and climate change. The journal focuses on various forms of innovation, including technological, organizational, economic, institutional, and political, as well as economy-wide and sectoral changes in areas such as energy, transport, agriculture, and water management. It endeavors to tackle complex questions concerning social, economic, behavioral-psychological, and political barriers and opportunities, along with their intricate interactions. With a multidisciplinary approach and methodological openness, the journal welcomes contributions from a wide array of disciplines within the social, environmental, and innovation sciences.