术前栓塞对骨盆髂骶区域局部骨巨细胞瘤的影响

IF 2.3 4区 医学 Q3 ONCOLOGY Surgical Oncology-Oxford Pub Date : 2024-07-10 DOI:10.1016/j.suronc.2024.102101
Fabrice Scheurer , Dominik Kaiser , Adrian Kobe , Maria Smolle , Daniel Suter , José Miguel Spirig , Daniel Müller
{"title":"术前栓塞对骨盆髂骶区域局部骨巨细胞瘤的影响","authors":"Fabrice Scheurer ,&nbsp;Dominik Kaiser ,&nbsp;Adrian Kobe ,&nbsp;Maria Smolle ,&nbsp;Daniel Suter ,&nbsp;José Miguel Spirig ,&nbsp;Daniel Müller","doi":"10.1016/j.suronc.2024.102101","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Introduction</h3><p>Giant cell tumors of the bone (GCTB) are aggressive neoplasms, with rare occurrences in the posterior pelvis and sacral area. Surgical challenges in this region include the inability to apply a tourniquet and limited cementation post-curettage due to proximity to neurovascular structures, leading to potential complications. This case-control study explores the impact of preoperative embolization on GCTB located in the iliosacral region.</p></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><p>Five surgeries (January–December 2021) for pelvic GCTB (3 sacrum, 2 posterior ilium) were performed on four patients. Diagnosis was confirmed through preoperative CT-guided biopsies. One surgery involved curettage with PMMA cement filling, while four surgeries had curettage without cavity filling. Preoperative embolization of the tumor feeding vessel occurred approximately 16 h before surgery in two cases. Denosumab treatment was not administered.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>Tumor volume, assessed by preoperative MRI, was comparable between patients with and without preoperative embolization (p = .14). Surgeries without embolization had a mean intraoperative blood loss of 3250 ml, erythrocyte transfusion volume of 1125 ml, and a mean surgical time of 114.5 min for two surgeries. Surgeries with preoperative embolization showed a mean intraoperative blood loss of 1850 ml, no erythrocyte transfusion requirement, and a mean surgical time of 68 min.</p></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><p>Curettage of GCTB in the posterior pelvis and sacrum presents challenges, with significant intraoperative blood loss impacting surgical time and transfusion needs. Preoperative embolization may be beneficial in reducing blood loss during surgery in these cases.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":51185,"journal":{"name":"Surgical Oncology-Oxford","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":2.3000,"publicationDate":"2024-07-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0960740424000690/pdfft?md5=ef4720dd51130119a9d763ea2917190c&pid=1-s2.0-S0960740424000690-main.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"The effect of preoperative embolization on giant cell tumors of the bone localized in the iliosacral region of the pelvis\",\"authors\":\"Fabrice Scheurer ,&nbsp;Dominik Kaiser ,&nbsp;Adrian Kobe ,&nbsp;Maria Smolle ,&nbsp;Daniel Suter ,&nbsp;José Miguel Spirig ,&nbsp;Daniel Müller\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.suronc.2024.102101\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><h3>Introduction</h3><p>Giant cell tumors of the bone (GCTB) are aggressive neoplasms, with rare occurrences in the posterior pelvis and sacral area. Surgical challenges in this region include the inability to apply a tourniquet and limited cementation post-curettage due to proximity to neurovascular structures, leading to potential complications. This case-control study explores the impact of preoperative embolization on GCTB located in the iliosacral region.</p></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><p>Five surgeries (January–December 2021) for pelvic GCTB (3 sacrum, 2 posterior ilium) were performed on four patients. Diagnosis was confirmed through preoperative CT-guided biopsies. One surgery involved curettage with PMMA cement filling, while four surgeries had curettage without cavity filling. Preoperative embolization of the tumor feeding vessel occurred approximately 16 h before surgery in two cases. Denosumab treatment was not administered.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>Tumor volume, assessed by preoperative MRI, was comparable between patients with and without preoperative embolization (p = .14). Surgeries without embolization had a mean intraoperative blood loss of 3250 ml, erythrocyte transfusion volume of 1125 ml, and a mean surgical time of 114.5 min for two surgeries. Surgeries with preoperative embolization showed a mean intraoperative blood loss of 1850 ml, no erythrocyte transfusion requirement, and a mean surgical time of 68 min.</p></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><p>Curettage of GCTB in the posterior pelvis and sacrum presents challenges, with significant intraoperative blood loss impacting surgical time and transfusion needs. Preoperative embolization may be beneficial in reducing blood loss during surgery in these cases.</p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":51185,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Surgical Oncology-Oxford\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.3000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-07-10\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0960740424000690/pdfft?md5=ef4720dd51130119a9d763ea2917190c&pid=1-s2.0-S0960740424000690-main.pdf\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Surgical Oncology-Oxford\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0960740424000690\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"ONCOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Surgical Oncology-Oxford","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0960740424000690","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"ONCOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

导言骨巨细胞瘤(GCTB)是一种侵袭性肿瘤,罕见于骨盆后部和骶骨部位。该区域的手术难点包括无法使用止血带,以及由于靠近神经血管结构而限制了缝合后的骨水泥固定,从而导致潜在的并发症。本病例对照研究探讨了术前栓塞对位于髂骶区域的 GCTB 的影响。方法对四名患者进行了五次骨盆 GCTB 手术(2021 年 1 月至 12 月)(骶骨 3 例,髂骨后 2 例)。诊断是通过术前 CT 引导下的活检确诊的。其中一次手术采用刮宫术,并用PMMA水泥填充,四次手术采用刮宫术,但没有填充空腔。有两例患者在术前约16小时对肿瘤供血血管进行了栓塞。结果通过术前磁共振成像评估,术前栓塞和未栓塞的患者肿瘤体积相当(p = .14)。无栓塞手术的术中平均失血量为 3250 毫升,输红细胞量为 1125 毫升,两次手术的平均手术时间为 114.5 分钟。结论骨盆后部和骶骨 GCTB 的清创术是一项挑战,术中大量失血会影响手术时间和输血需求。在这些病例中,术前栓塞可能有利于减少手术失血。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
The effect of preoperative embolization on giant cell tumors of the bone localized in the iliosacral region of the pelvis

Introduction

Giant cell tumors of the bone (GCTB) are aggressive neoplasms, with rare occurrences in the posterior pelvis and sacral area. Surgical challenges in this region include the inability to apply a tourniquet and limited cementation post-curettage due to proximity to neurovascular structures, leading to potential complications. This case-control study explores the impact of preoperative embolization on GCTB located in the iliosacral region.

Methods

Five surgeries (January–December 2021) for pelvic GCTB (3 sacrum, 2 posterior ilium) were performed on four patients. Diagnosis was confirmed through preoperative CT-guided biopsies. One surgery involved curettage with PMMA cement filling, while four surgeries had curettage without cavity filling. Preoperative embolization of the tumor feeding vessel occurred approximately 16 h before surgery in two cases. Denosumab treatment was not administered.

Results

Tumor volume, assessed by preoperative MRI, was comparable between patients with and without preoperative embolization (p = .14). Surgeries without embolization had a mean intraoperative blood loss of 3250 ml, erythrocyte transfusion volume of 1125 ml, and a mean surgical time of 114.5 min for two surgeries. Surgeries with preoperative embolization showed a mean intraoperative blood loss of 1850 ml, no erythrocyte transfusion requirement, and a mean surgical time of 68 min.

Conclusion

Curettage of GCTB in the posterior pelvis and sacrum presents challenges, with significant intraoperative blood loss impacting surgical time and transfusion needs. Preoperative embolization may be beneficial in reducing blood loss during surgery in these cases.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Surgical Oncology-Oxford
Surgical Oncology-Oxford 医学-外科
CiteScore
4.50
自引率
0.00%
发文量
169
审稿时长
38 days
期刊介绍: Surgical Oncology is a peer reviewed journal publishing review articles that contribute to the advancement of knowledge in surgical oncology and related fields of interest. Articles represent a spectrum of current technology in oncology research as well as those concerning clinical trials, surgical technique, methods of investigation and patient evaluation. Surgical Oncology publishes comprehensive Reviews that examine individual topics in considerable detail, in addition to editorials and commentaries which focus on selected papers. The journal also publishes special issues which explore topics of interest to surgical oncologists in great detail - outlining recent advancements and providing readers with the most up to date information.
期刊最新文献
Machine learning in cancer prognostication: Limitations and opportunities. Bilobed lateral artery perforator-based flap for partial breast reconstruction - Technique description and results from a ten-year cohort. Individualizing care for patients with gallbladder cancer Natural history of salivary gland secretory carcinoma: A REFCOR study. Tumor necrosis drives prognosis in osteosarcoma: No difference in chemotherapy response and survival between chondroblastic and osteoblastic osteosarcoma
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1