停止推荐髋关节预防措施并不会增加使用 36 毫米头的初级全髋关节置换术后早期脱位的风险:一项基于丹麦髋关节置换术登记的人群研究。

IF 2.4 2区 医学 Q1 ORTHOPEDICS Acta Orthopaedica Pub Date : 2024-07-18 DOI:10.2340/17453674.2024.41168
Afrim Iljazi, Michala Skovlund Sørensen, Matilde Winther-Jensen, Søren Overgaard, Michael Mørk Petersen
{"title":"停止推荐髋关节预防措施并不会增加使用 36 毫米头的初级全髋关节置换术后早期脱位的风险:一项基于丹麦髋关节置换术登记的人群研究。","authors":"Afrim Iljazi, Michala Skovlund Sørensen, Matilde Winther-Jensen, Søren Overgaard, Michael Mørk Petersen","doi":"10.2340/17453674.2024.41168","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background and purpose: </strong>Dislocation is a severe complication following total hip arthroplasty (THA). Hip precautions have been recommended in the initial postoperative period but evidence supporting this practice is limited. We therefore conducted a population-based study to evaluate the association between discontinuing recommending postoperative hip precautions and the risk of early dislocation.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This is a cohort study with data from the Danish Hip Arthroplasty Register and the Danish National Patient Register. We included patients who underwent primary THA for osteoarthritis in 2004-2019 in public hospitals in the Capital Region of Denmark. The cohort was divided into the hip precautions group, comprising patients operated on between 2004 and 2009, and the no-precautions group operated on between 2014 and 2019. The primary outcome was the difference in the absolute risk of dislocation within 3 months post-surgery. The secondary outcome assessed the same risk within 2 years. We evaluated the difference in absolute risk using absolute risk regression (ARR).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The cumulative incidence of dislocation within 3 months was 2.9% (confidence interval [CI] 2.5-3.3) in the hip precautions group and 3.5% (CI 3.1-3.9) in the no-precautions group. The risk of dislocation was higher in the no-precautions group but failed to reach statistical significance in the crude (ARR 1.2, CI 0.9-1.6) and multivariate model (ARR 1.4, CI 0.9-2.2).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>We found a higher but statistically insignificant increase in the risk of early dislocation in the no-precautions group. The lack of significance in the association may be explained by the increased use of 36-mm femoral heads after the guideline revision.</p>","PeriodicalId":6916,"journal":{"name":"Acta Orthopaedica","volume":"95 ","pages":"407-414"},"PeriodicalIF":2.4000,"publicationDate":"2024-07-18","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11257070/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Discontinuing the recommendation of hip precautions does not increase the risk of early dislocation after primary total hip arthroplasty using 36-mm heads: a population-based study from the Danish Hip Arthroplasty Register.\",\"authors\":\"Afrim Iljazi, Michala Skovlund Sørensen, Matilde Winther-Jensen, Søren Overgaard, Michael Mørk Petersen\",\"doi\":\"10.2340/17453674.2024.41168\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background and purpose: </strong>Dislocation is a severe complication following total hip arthroplasty (THA). Hip precautions have been recommended in the initial postoperative period but evidence supporting this practice is limited. We therefore conducted a population-based study to evaluate the association between discontinuing recommending postoperative hip precautions and the risk of early dislocation.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This is a cohort study with data from the Danish Hip Arthroplasty Register and the Danish National Patient Register. We included patients who underwent primary THA for osteoarthritis in 2004-2019 in public hospitals in the Capital Region of Denmark. The cohort was divided into the hip precautions group, comprising patients operated on between 2004 and 2009, and the no-precautions group operated on between 2014 and 2019. The primary outcome was the difference in the absolute risk of dislocation within 3 months post-surgery. The secondary outcome assessed the same risk within 2 years. We evaluated the difference in absolute risk using absolute risk regression (ARR).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The cumulative incidence of dislocation within 3 months was 2.9% (confidence interval [CI] 2.5-3.3) in the hip precautions group and 3.5% (CI 3.1-3.9) in the no-precautions group. The risk of dislocation was higher in the no-precautions group but failed to reach statistical significance in the crude (ARR 1.2, CI 0.9-1.6) and multivariate model (ARR 1.4, CI 0.9-2.2).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>We found a higher but statistically insignificant increase in the risk of early dislocation in the no-precautions group. The lack of significance in the association may be explained by the increased use of 36-mm femoral heads after the guideline revision.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":6916,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Acta Orthopaedica\",\"volume\":\"95 \",\"pages\":\"407-414\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.4000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-07-18\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11257070/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Acta Orthopaedica\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.2340/17453674.2024.41168\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"ORTHOPEDICS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Acta Orthopaedica","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2340/17453674.2024.41168","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ORTHOPEDICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景和目的:脱位是全髋关节置换术(THA)后的一种严重并发症。有人建议在术后初期采取髋关节预防措施,但支持这种做法的证据有限。因此,我们开展了一项基于人群的研究,以评估停止推荐术后髋关节预防措施与早期脱位风险之间的关系:这是一项队列研究,数据来自丹麦髋关节置换术登记册和丹麦全国患者登记册。我们纳入了 2004-2019 年期间在丹麦首都地区公立医院因骨关节炎接受初级 THA 的患者。队列分为髋关节预防措施组(包括2004年至2009年期间接受手术的患者)和无预防措施组(2014年至2019年期间接受手术的患者)。主要结果是术后3个月内脱位绝对风险的差异。次要结果是评估两年内的相同风险。我们使用绝对风险回归法(ARR)评估了绝对风险的差异:髋关节预防措施组3个月内脱位的累积发生率为2.9%(置信区间[CI] 2.5-3.3),无预防措施组为3.5%(置信区间[CI] 3.1-3.9)。无预防措施组的脱位风险较高,但在粗略模型(ARR 1.2,CI 0.9-1.6)和多变量模型(ARR 1.4,CI 0.9-2.2)中均未达到统计学意义:我们发现,无预防措施组的早期脱臼风险较高,但在统计学上并不显著。相关性不显著的原因可能是指南修订后36毫米股骨头的使用增加了。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

摘要图片

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Discontinuing the recommendation of hip precautions does not increase the risk of early dislocation after primary total hip arthroplasty using 36-mm heads: a population-based study from the Danish Hip Arthroplasty Register.

Background and purpose: Dislocation is a severe complication following total hip arthroplasty (THA). Hip precautions have been recommended in the initial postoperative period but evidence supporting this practice is limited. We therefore conducted a population-based study to evaluate the association between discontinuing recommending postoperative hip precautions and the risk of early dislocation.

Methods: This is a cohort study with data from the Danish Hip Arthroplasty Register and the Danish National Patient Register. We included patients who underwent primary THA for osteoarthritis in 2004-2019 in public hospitals in the Capital Region of Denmark. The cohort was divided into the hip precautions group, comprising patients operated on between 2004 and 2009, and the no-precautions group operated on between 2014 and 2019. The primary outcome was the difference in the absolute risk of dislocation within 3 months post-surgery. The secondary outcome assessed the same risk within 2 years. We evaluated the difference in absolute risk using absolute risk regression (ARR).

Results: The cumulative incidence of dislocation within 3 months was 2.9% (confidence interval [CI] 2.5-3.3) in the hip precautions group and 3.5% (CI 3.1-3.9) in the no-precautions group. The risk of dislocation was higher in the no-precautions group but failed to reach statistical significance in the crude (ARR 1.2, CI 0.9-1.6) and multivariate model (ARR 1.4, CI 0.9-2.2).

Conclusion: We found a higher but statistically insignificant increase in the risk of early dislocation in the no-precautions group. The lack of significance in the association may be explained by the increased use of 36-mm femoral heads after the guideline revision.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Acta Orthopaedica
Acta Orthopaedica 医学-整形外科
CiteScore
6.40
自引率
8.10%
发文量
105
审稿时长
4-8 weeks
期刊介绍: Acta Orthopaedica (previously Acta Orthopaedica Scandinavica) presents original articles of basic research interest, as well as clinical studies in the field of orthopedics and related sub disciplines. Ever since the journal was founded in 1930, by a group of Scandinavian orthopedic surgeons, the journal has been published for an international audience. Acta Orthopaedica is owned by the Nordic Orthopaedic Federation and is the official publication of this federation.
期刊最新文献
Editorial: The value of arthroplasty registries: from surveillance to societal impact. Early acetabular cup migration is associated with long-term aseptic loosening: investigation of 1-year and 2-year radiostereometric analysis cohort migration thresholds against acetabular cup survivorship from two national registries. Patients with an acetabular fracture treated with acute total hip arthroplasty and additional fixation: a cohort study with functional and radiological follow-ups. Can we quantify a safe margin to reduce local recurrence in parosteal osteosarcomas around the distal femur? A cohort study based on 27 patients. No difference in patient-reported outcome measures between private and public hospitals in the Netherlands: a cross-sectional analysis based on 170,150 hip and knee arthroplasties from the Dutch Arthroplasty Register.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1