活体肝移植后 180 天内尽早转用依维莫司。

IF 1.9 4区 医学 Q2 SURGERY Clinical Transplantation Pub Date : 2024-07-18 DOI:10.1111/ctr.15402
Katelyn N. Rudzik, Kristine S. Schonder, Abhinav Humar, Heather J. Johnson
{"title":"活体肝移植后 180 天内尽早转用依维莫司。","authors":"Katelyn N. Rudzik,&nbsp;Kristine S. Schonder,&nbsp;Abhinav Humar,&nbsp;Heather J. Johnson","doi":"10.1111/ctr.15402","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div>\n \n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Background</h3>\n \n <p>Early conversion to Everolimus (EVR) post deceased donor liver transplant has been associated with improved renal function but increased rejection. Early EVR conversion has not been evaluated after living donor liver transplant (LDLT). A retrospective cohort study was conducted to compare the rate of rejection and renal function in patients converted to EVR early post-LDLT to patients on calcineurin inhibitors (CNIs).</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Methods</h3>\n \n <p>This was a single center retrospective cohort study of adult LDLT recipients between January 2012 and July 2019. Patients converted to EVR within 180 days of transplant were compared to patients on CNIs. The primary endpoint was biopsy proven acute rejection (BPAR) at 24 months posttransplant. Key secondary endpoints included eGFR at 24 months, change in eGFR, adverse events, and all-cause mortality.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Results</h3>\n \n <p>From a total of 173 patients involved in the study: 58 were included in the EVR group and 115 in the CNI group. Median conversion to EVR was 26 days post-LDLT. At 24 months, there was no difference in BPAR (22.7% EVR vs. 19.1% CNI, <i>p</i> = 0.63). Median eGFR at 24 months posttransplant was not significantly different (68.6 [24.8 to 112.4] mL/min EVR vs. 75.9 [35.6–116.2] mL/min CNI, <i>p</i> = 0.103). Change in eGFR from baseline was worse in the EVR group (−13.0 [−39.9 to 13.9] mL/min EVR vs. −5.0 [−31.2 to 21.2] mL/min CNI, <i>p</i> = 0.047). Median change from conversion to 24 months posttransplant (EVR group only) was −3.43 mL/min/1.73 m<sup>2</sup> (−21.0 to 9.6).</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Conclusions</h3>\n \n <p>Early EVR conversion was not associated with increased risk of rejection among LDLT recipients. Renal function was not impacted. EVR may be considered as an alternative after LDLT in patients intolerant of CNIs.</p>\n </section>\n </div>","PeriodicalId":10467,"journal":{"name":"Clinical Transplantation","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.9000,"publicationDate":"2024-07-18","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1111/ctr.15402","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Early Conversion to Everolimus Within 180 Days of Living Donor Liver Transplantation\",\"authors\":\"Katelyn N. Rudzik,&nbsp;Kristine S. Schonder,&nbsp;Abhinav Humar,&nbsp;Heather J. Johnson\",\"doi\":\"10.1111/ctr.15402\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div>\\n \\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Background</h3>\\n \\n <p>Early conversion to Everolimus (EVR) post deceased donor liver transplant has been associated with improved renal function but increased rejection. Early EVR conversion has not been evaluated after living donor liver transplant (LDLT). A retrospective cohort study was conducted to compare the rate of rejection and renal function in patients converted to EVR early post-LDLT to patients on calcineurin inhibitors (CNIs).</p>\\n </section>\\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Methods</h3>\\n \\n <p>This was a single center retrospective cohort study of adult LDLT recipients between January 2012 and July 2019. Patients converted to EVR within 180 days of transplant were compared to patients on CNIs. The primary endpoint was biopsy proven acute rejection (BPAR) at 24 months posttransplant. Key secondary endpoints included eGFR at 24 months, change in eGFR, adverse events, and all-cause mortality.</p>\\n </section>\\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Results</h3>\\n \\n <p>From a total of 173 patients involved in the study: 58 were included in the EVR group and 115 in the CNI group. Median conversion to EVR was 26 days post-LDLT. At 24 months, there was no difference in BPAR (22.7% EVR vs. 19.1% CNI, <i>p</i> = 0.63). Median eGFR at 24 months posttransplant was not significantly different (68.6 [24.8 to 112.4] mL/min EVR vs. 75.9 [35.6–116.2] mL/min CNI, <i>p</i> = 0.103). Change in eGFR from baseline was worse in the EVR group (−13.0 [−39.9 to 13.9] mL/min EVR vs. −5.0 [−31.2 to 21.2] mL/min CNI, <i>p</i> = 0.047). Median change from conversion to 24 months posttransplant (EVR group only) was −3.43 mL/min/1.73 m<sup>2</sup> (−21.0 to 9.6).</p>\\n </section>\\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Conclusions</h3>\\n \\n <p>Early EVR conversion was not associated with increased risk of rejection among LDLT recipients. Renal function was not impacted. EVR may be considered as an alternative after LDLT in patients intolerant of CNIs.</p>\\n </section>\\n </div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":10467,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Clinical Transplantation\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.9000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-07-18\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1111/ctr.15402\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Clinical Transplantation\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/ctr.15402\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"SURGERY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Clinical Transplantation","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/ctr.15402","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"SURGERY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:死亡供体肝移植后早期转用依维莫司(EVR)可改善肾功能,但会增加排斥反应。尚未对活体肝移植(LDLT)后早期转用依维莫司进行评估。我们进行了一项回顾性队列研究,以比较LDLT后早期转为EVR的患者与使用钙神经蛋白抑制剂(CNIs)的患者的排斥反应率和肾功能:这是一项单中心回顾性队列研究,研究对象为2012年1月至2019年7月期间接受LDLT的成人患者。将移植后180天内转为EVR的患者与使用CNIs的患者进行比较。主要终点是移植后24个月活检证实的急性排斥反应(BPAR)。主要次要终点包括24个月时的eGFR、eGFR的变化、不良事件和全因死亡率:共有 173 名患者参与了研究:结果:总共有 173 名患者参与了这项研究:58 人被纳入 EVR 组,115 人被纳入 CNI 组。转为EVR的中位时间为LDLT术后26天。24个月后,BPAR无差异(EVR为22.7%,CNI为19.1%,P = 0.63)。移植后 24 个月的中位 eGFR 无显著差异(EVR 为 68.6 [24.8 至 112.4] mL/min vs CNI 为 75.9 [35.6-116.2] mL/min,p = 0.103)。EVR组的eGFR与基线相比变化较小(-13.0 [-39.9 to 13.9] mL/min EVR vs. -5.0 [-31.2 to 21.2] mL/min CNI,p = 0.047)。从转换到移植后24个月的中位变化(仅EVR组)为-3.43 mL/min/1.73 m2 (-21.0 to 9.6):结论:早期EVR转换与LDLT受者排斥风险增加无关。结论:早期 EVR 转换与 LDLT 受者排斥风险的增加无关,肾功能也未受到影响。对于不耐受 CNIs 的患者,可考虑在 LDLT 后将 EVR 作为一种替代治疗方法。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

摘要图片

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Early Conversion to Everolimus Within 180 Days of Living Donor Liver Transplantation

Background

Early conversion to Everolimus (EVR) post deceased donor liver transplant has been associated with improved renal function but increased rejection. Early EVR conversion has not been evaluated after living donor liver transplant (LDLT). A retrospective cohort study was conducted to compare the rate of rejection and renal function in patients converted to EVR early post-LDLT to patients on calcineurin inhibitors (CNIs).

Methods

This was a single center retrospective cohort study of adult LDLT recipients between January 2012 and July 2019. Patients converted to EVR within 180 days of transplant were compared to patients on CNIs. The primary endpoint was biopsy proven acute rejection (BPAR) at 24 months posttransplant. Key secondary endpoints included eGFR at 24 months, change in eGFR, adverse events, and all-cause mortality.

Results

From a total of 173 patients involved in the study: 58 were included in the EVR group and 115 in the CNI group. Median conversion to EVR was 26 days post-LDLT. At 24 months, there was no difference in BPAR (22.7% EVR vs. 19.1% CNI, p = 0.63). Median eGFR at 24 months posttransplant was not significantly different (68.6 [24.8 to 112.4] mL/min EVR vs. 75.9 [35.6–116.2] mL/min CNI, p = 0.103). Change in eGFR from baseline was worse in the EVR group (−13.0 [−39.9 to 13.9] mL/min EVR vs. −5.0 [−31.2 to 21.2] mL/min CNI, p = 0.047). Median change from conversion to 24 months posttransplant (EVR group only) was −3.43 mL/min/1.73 m2 (−21.0 to 9.6).

Conclusions

Early EVR conversion was not associated with increased risk of rejection among LDLT recipients. Renal function was not impacted. EVR may be considered as an alternative after LDLT in patients intolerant of CNIs.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Clinical Transplantation
Clinical Transplantation 医学-外科
CiteScore
3.70
自引率
4.80%
发文量
286
审稿时长
2 months
期刊介绍: Clinical Transplantation: The Journal of Clinical and Translational Research aims to serve as a channel of rapid communication for all those involved in the care of patients who require, or have had, organ or tissue transplants, including: kidney, intestine, liver, pancreas, islets, heart, heart valves, lung, bone marrow, cornea, skin, bone, and cartilage, viable or stored. Published monthly, Clinical Transplantation’s scope is focused on the complete spectrum of present transplant therapies, as well as also those that are experimental or may become possible in future. Topics include: Immunology and immunosuppression; Patient preparation; Social, ethical, and psychological issues; Complications, short- and long-term results; Artificial organs; Donation and preservation of organ and tissue; Translational studies; Advances in tissue typing; Updates on transplant pathology;. Clinical and translational studies are particularly welcome, as well as focused reviews. Full-length papers and short communications are invited. Clinical reviews are encouraged, as well as seminal papers in basic science which might lead to immediate clinical application. Prominence is regularly given to the results of cooperative surveys conducted by the organ and tissue transplant registries. Clinical Transplantation: The Journal of Clinical and Translational Research is essential reading for clinicians and researchers in the diverse field of transplantation: surgeons; clinical immunologists; cryobiologists; hematologists; gastroenterologists; hepatologists; pulmonologists; nephrologists; cardiologists; and endocrinologists. It will also be of interest to sociologists, psychologists, research workers, and to all health professionals whose combined efforts will improve the prognosis of transplant recipients.
期刊最新文献
ChatGPT Solving Complex Kidney Transplant Cases: A Comparative Study With Human Respondents Interplay of Donor–Recipient Relationship and Donor Race in Living Liver Donation in the United States Successful Kidney Transplantation Despite Therapeutic Anticoagulation—Effective Apixaban Elimination by Hemoadsorption Subclinical Pancreas Rejection on Protocol Biopsy Within the First Year of Simultaneous Pancreas Kidney Transplant External Validation of a Limited Sampling Strategy for the Estimation of Mycophenolic Acid Exposure Between Different Assay Methods: PETINIA and HPLC Methods
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1