长期持续筛查心房颤动后的心衰事件:随机 LOOP 研究的结果。

IF 9.1 1区 医学 Q1 CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS Circulation. Arrhythmia and electrophysiology Pub Date : 2024-08-01 Epub Date: 2024-07-18 DOI:10.1161/CIRCEP.124.012764
Lucas Yixi Xing, Søren Højberg, Derk W Kriegerg, Claus Graff, Morten S Olesen, Jeff S Healey, William F McIntyre, Axel Brandes, Lars Køber, Ketil Jørgen Haugan, Jesper Hastrup Svendsen, Søren Zöga Diederichsen
{"title":"长期持续筛查心房颤动后的心衰事件:随机 LOOP 研究的结果。","authors":"Lucas Yixi Xing, Søren Højberg, Derk W Kriegerg, Claus Graff, Morten S Olesen, Jeff S Healey, William F McIntyre, Axel Brandes, Lars Køber, Ketil Jørgen Haugan, Jesper Hastrup Svendsen, Søren Zöga Diederichsen","doi":"10.1161/CIRCEP.124.012764","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Mounting evidence indicates that even device-detected subclinical atrial fibrillation is associated with a higher risk of heart failure (HF). However, the potential impact of atrial fibrillation screening on HF remains unknown.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>The LOOP Study (Atrial Fibrillation detected by Continuous ECG Monitoring using Implantable Loop Recorder to prevent Stroke in High-risk Individuals) evaluated the effects of atrial fibrillation screening on stroke prevention using an implantable loop recorder (ILR) versus usual care in older individuals with additional stroke risk factors. In this secondary analysis, we explored the following HF end points: (1) HF event or cardiovascular death; (2) HF event; (3) event with HF with reduced ejection fraction (HFrEF); and (4) HFrEF event or cardiovascular death. Outcomes were assessed in a Cox model both as time-to-first events and as total (first and recurrent) events analyzed using the Andersen-and-Gill method.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Of 6004 participants (mean age 74.7 and 52.7% men), 1501 were randomized to ILR screening and 4503 to the control group. In total, 77 (5.1%) in the ILR group versus 295 (6.6%) in the control group experienced the primary outcome of an HF event or cardiovascular death. Compared with usual care, ILR screening was associated with a nonsignificant reduction in the primary outcome for the time-to-first event analysis (hazard ratio, 0.78 [95% CI, 0.61-1.01]) and the total event analysis (hazard ratio, 0.77 [95% CI, 0.59-1.01]). Similar results were obtained for the HF event. A significant risk reduction in total events was observed in the ILR group for the composite of HFrEF event or cardiovascular death and for HFrEF event (hazard ratio, 0.74 [95% CI, 0.56-0.98] and 0.65 [95% CI, 0.44-0.97], respectively).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>In an older population with additional stroke risk factors, ILR screening for atrial fibrillation tended to be associated with a lower rate of total HF events and cardiovascular death, particularly those related to HFrEF. These findings should be considered hypothesis-generating and warrant further investigation.</p><p><strong>Registration: </strong>URL: https://www.clinicaltrials.gov; Unique identifier: NCT02036450.</p>","PeriodicalId":10319,"journal":{"name":"Circulation. Arrhythmia and electrophysiology","volume":" ","pages":"e012764"},"PeriodicalIF":9.1000,"publicationDate":"2024-08-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Heart Failure Events After Long-term Continuous Screening for Atrial Fibrillation: Results From the Randomized LOOP Study.\",\"authors\":\"Lucas Yixi Xing, Søren Højberg, Derk W Kriegerg, Claus Graff, Morten S Olesen, Jeff S Healey, William F McIntyre, Axel Brandes, Lars Køber, Ketil Jørgen Haugan, Jesper Hastrup Svendsen, Søren Zöga Diederichsen\",\"doi\":\"10.1161/CIRCEP.124.012764\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Mounting evidence indicates that even device-detected subclinical atrial fibrillation is associated with a higher risk of heart failure (HF). However, the potential impact of atrial fibrillation screening on HF remains unknown.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>The LOOP Study (Atrial Fibrillation detected by Continuous ECG Monitoring using Implantable Loop Recorder to prevent Stroke in High-risk Individuals) evaluated the effects of atrial fibrillation screening on stroke prevention using an implantable loop recorder (ILR) versus usual care in older individuals with additional stroke risk factors. In this secondary analysis, we explored the following HF end points: (1) HF event or cardiovascular death; (2) HF event; (3) event with HF with reduced ejection fraction (HFrEF); and (4) HFrEF event or cardiovascular death. Outcomes were assessed in a Cox model both as time-to-first events and as total (first and recurrent) events analyzed using the Andersen-and-Gill method.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Of 6004 participants (mean age 74.7 and 52.7% men), 1501 were randomized to ILR screening and 4503 to the control group. In total, 77 (5.1%) in the ILR group versus 295 (6.6%) in the control group experienced the primary outcome of an HF event or cardiovascular death. Compared with usual care, ILR screening was associated with a nonsignificant reduction in the primary outcome for the time-to-first event analysis (hazard ratio, 0.78 [95% CI, 0.61-1.01]) and the total event analysis (hazard ratio, 0.77 [95% CI, 0.59-1.01]). Similar results were obtained for the HF event. A significant risk reduction in total events was observed in the ILR group for the composite of HFrEF event or cardiovascular death and for HFrEF event (hazard ratio, 0.74 [95% CI, 0.56-0.98] and 0.65 [95% CI, 0.44-0.97], respectively).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>In an older population with additional stroke risk factors, ILR screening for atrial fibrillation tended to be associated with a lower rate of total HF events and cardiovascular death, particularly those related to HFrEF. These findings should be considered hypothesis-generating and warrant further investigation.</p><p><strong>Registration: </strong>URL: https://www.clinicaltrials.gov; Unique identifier: NCT02036450.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":10319,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Circulation. Arrhythmia and electrophysiology\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"e012764\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":9.1000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-08-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Circulation. Arrhythmia and electrophysiology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1161/CIRCEP.124.012764\",\"RegionNum\":1,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2024/7/18 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Circulation. Arrhythmia and electrophysiology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1161/CIRCEP.124.012764","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/7/18 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:越来越多的证据表明,即使是设备检测到的亚临床心房颤动也与较高的心力衰竭(HF)风险有关。然而,心房颤动筛查对心力衰竭的潜在影响仍然未知:LOOP研究(使用植入式环路记录仪连续监测心电图发现心房颤动以预防高危人群中风)评估了使用植入式环路记录仪(ILR)与常规护理相比,对具有额外中风风险因素的老年人进行心房颤动筛查对预防中风的影响。在这项二次分析中,我们探讨了以下高血压终点:(1) 高血压事件或心血管死亡;(2) 高血压事件;(3) 射血分数降低的高血压(HFrEF)事件;(4) HFrEF 事件或心血管死亡。采用Cox模型对结果进行评估,包括首次事件发生时间和使用Andersen-and-Gill方法分析的总事件(首次和复发):在 6004 名参与者(平均年龄 74.7 岁,52.7% 为男性)中,1501 人被随机分配到 ILR 筛查组,4503 人被分配到对照组。ILR组共有77人(5.1%)发生了高血压事件或心血管死亡,而对照组则有295人(6.6%)发生了高血压事件或心血管死亡。与常规护理相比,ILR筛查在首次事件发生时间分析(危险比为0.78 [95% CI, 0.61-1.01])和总事件分析(危险比为0.77 [95% CI, 0.59-1.01])中与主要结局的减少无显著相关性。高频事件也得到了类似的结果。在ILR组中,HFrEF事件或心血管死亡的复合风险以及HFrEF事件的总事件风险均有明显降低(危险比分别为0.74 [95% CI, 0.56-0.98] 和0.65 [95% CI, 0.44-0.97]):结论:在具有卒中风险因素的老年人群中,ILR筛查心房颤动往往与较低的高频事件发生率和心血管死亡有关,尤其是与高频心房颤动相关的事件。这些发现应被视为假设,值得进一步研究:URL:https://www.clinicaltrials.gov;唯一标识符:NCT02036450。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Heart Failure Events After Long-term Continuous Screening for Atrial Fibrillation: Results From the Randomized LOOP Study.

Background: Mounting evidence indicates that even device-detected subclinical atrial fibrillation is associated with a higher risk of heart failure (HF). However, the potential impact of atrial fibrillation screening on HF remains unknown.

Methods: The LOOP Study (Atrial Fibrillation detected by Continuous ECG Monitoring using Implantable Loop Recorder to prevent Stroke in High-risk Individuals) evaluated the effects of atrial fibrillation screening on stroke prevention using an implantable loop recorder (ILR) versus usual care in older individuals with additional stroke risk factors. In this secondary analysis, we explored the following HF end points: (1) HF event or cardiovascular death; (2) HF event; (3) event with HF with reduced ejection fraction (HFrEF); and (4) HFrEF event or cardiovascular death. Outcomes were assessed in a Cox model both as time-to-first events and as total (first and recurrent) events analyzed using the Andersen-and-Gill method.

Results: Of 6004 participants (mean age 74.7 and 52.7% men), 1501 were randomized to ILR screening and 4503 to the control group. In total, 77 (5.1%) in the ILR group versus 295 (6.6%) in the control group experienced the primary outcome of an HF event or cardiovascular death. Compared with usual care, ILR screening was associated with a nonsignificant reduction in the primary outcome for the time-to-first event analysis (hazard ratio, 0.78 [95% CI, 0.61-1.01]) and the total event analysis (hazard ratio, 0.77 [95% CI, 0.59-1.01]). Similar results were obtained for the HF event. A significant risk reduction in total events was observed in the ILR group for the composite of HFrEF event or cardiovascular death and for HFrEF event (hazard ratio, 0.74 [95% CI, 0.56-0.98] and 0.65 [95% CI, 0.44-0.97], respectively).

Conclusions: In an older population with additional stroke risk factors, ILR screening for atrial fibrillation tended to be associated with a lower rate of total HF events and cardiovascular death, particularly those related to HFrEF. These findings should be considered hypothesis-generating and warrant further investigation.

Registration: URL: https://www.clinicaltrials.gov; Unique identifier: NCT02036450.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
13.70
自引率
4.80%
发文量
187
审稿时长
4-8 weeks
期刊介绍: Circulation: Arrhythmia and Electrophysiology is a journal dedicated to the study and application of clinical cardiac electrophysiology. It covers a wide range of topics including the diagnosis and treatment of cardiac arrhythmias, as well as research in this field. The journal accepts various types of studies, including observational research, clinical trials, epidemiological studies, and advancements in translational research.
期刊最新文献
Exercise Training Improves Cognitive Function and Neurovascular Control: A Secondary Analysis of the Exercise Training in Heart Failure With Reduced Ejection Fraction and Permanent Atrial Fibrillation: A Randomized Clinical Trial. Resuscitated Sudden Cardiac Arrest as the Initial Presentation of Hypertrophic Cardiomyopathy. Impact of Being Underweight on the Safety and Efficacy of Atrial Fibrillation Ablation: An Analysis From the Japanese Catheter Ablation Registry. Multicenter Hemodynamic Assessment of the LOT-CRT Strategy: When Does Combining Left Bundle Branch Pacing and Coronary Venous Pacing Enhance Resynchronization?: Primary Results of the CSPOT Study. Performance of Atrial Fibrillation Burden Trends for Stroke Risk Stratification.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1