肺移植评估患者的不确定性和沟通偏好:混合方法研究。

IF 1.9 4区 医学 Q2 SURGERY Clinical Transplantation Pub Date : 2024-07-18 DOI:10.1111/ctr.15406
Allison V. Lange, Anuj B. Mehta, Kathleen J. Ramos, Eric G. Campbell, Alice L. Gray, Caroline Tietbohl, Sandra Garcia-Hernandez, David B. Bekelman
{"title":"肺移植评估患者的不确定性和沟通偏好:混合方法研究。","authors":"Allison V. Lange,&nbsp;Anuj B. Mehta,&nbsp;Kathleen J. Ramos,&nbsp;Eric G. Campbell,&nbsp;Alice L. Gray,&nbsp;Caroline Tietbohl,&nbsp;Sandra Garcia-Hernandez,&nbsp;David B. Bekelman","doi":"10.1111/ctr.15406","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div>\n \n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Objective</h3>\n \n <p>Higher uncertainty is associated with poorer quality of life and may be impacted by clinician communication about the future. We determined how patients undergoing lung transplant evaluation experience uncertainty and communication about the future from clinicians.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Methods</h3>\n \n <p>We performed a convergent parallel mixed-methods study using a cross-sectional survey and semistructured interviews. Patients undergoing lung transplant evaluation at the University of Colorado and the University of Washington answered questions about future communication and completed the Mishel Uncertainty in Illness Scale-Adult (MUIS-A; range 33–165, higher scores indicate more uncertainty). Interviews were analyzed using content analysis. Integration of survey and interview results occurred during data interpretation.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Results</h3>\n \n <p>A total of 101 patients completed the survey (response rate: 47%). Twelve survey participants completed interviews. In the survey, most patients identified changing family roles as important (76%), which was infrequently discussed with clinicians (31%). Most patients (86%) worried about the quality of their life in the future, and 74% said that not knowing what to expect in the future prevented them from making plans. The mean MUIS-A score was 85.5 (standard deviation 15.3). Interviews revealed three themes: (1) uncertainty of the future distresses participants; (2) participants want practical information from clinicians; and (3) communication preferences vary among participants.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Conclusion</h3>\n \n <p>Participants experienced distressing uncertainty and wanted information about the future. Communication topics that were important to participants were not always addressed by physicians. Clinicians should address how chronic lung disease and lung transplant can directly impact patients’ lives and support patients to cope with uncertainty.</p>\n </section>\n </div>","PeriodicalId":10467,"journal":{"name":"Clinical Transplantation","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.9000,"publicationDate":"2024-07-18","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Uncertainty and Communication Preferences Among Patients Undergoing Lung Transplant Evaluation: A Mixed-Methods Study\",\"authors\":\"Allison V. Lange,&nbsp;Anuj B. Mehta,&nbsp;Kathleen J. Ramos,&nbsp;Eric G. Campbell,&nbsp;Alice L. Gray,&nbsp;Caroline Tietbohl,&nbsp;Sandra Garcia-Hernandez,&nbsp;David B. Bekelman\",\"doi\":\"10.1111/ctr.15406\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div>\\n \\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Objective</h3>\\n \\n <p>Higher uncertainty is associated with poorer quality of life and may be impacted by clinician communication about the future. We determined how patients undergoing lung transplant evaluation experience uncertainty and communication about the future from clinicians.</p>\\n </section>\\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Methods</h3>\\n \\n <p>We performed a convergent parallel mixed-methods study using a cross-sectional survey and semistructured interviews. Patients undergoing lung transplant evaluation at the University of Colorado and the University of Washington answered questions about future communication and completed the Mishel Uncertainty in Illness Scale-Adult (MUIS-A; range 33–165, higher scores indicate more uncertainty). Interviews were analyzed using content analysis. Integration of survey and interview results occurred during data interpretation.</p>\\n </section>\\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Results</h3>\\n \\n <p>A total of 101 patients completed the survey (response rate: 47%). Twelve survey participants completed interviews. In the survey, most patients identified changing family roles as important (76%), which was infrequently discussed with clinicians (31%). Most patients (86%) worried about the quality of their life in the future, and 74% said that not knowing what to expect in the future prevented them from making plans. The mean MUIS-A score was 85.5 (standard deviation 15.3). Interviews revealed three themes: (1) uncertainty of the future distresses participants; (2) participants want practical information from clinicians; and (3) communication preferences vary among participants.</p>\\n </section>\\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Conclusion</h3>\\n \\n <p>Participants experienced distressing uncertainty and wanted information about the future. Communication topics that were important to participants were not always addressed by physicians. Clinicians should address how chronic lung disease and lung transplant can directly impact patients’ lives and support patients to cope with uncertainty.</p>\\n </section>\\n </div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":10467,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Clinical Transplantation\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.9000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-07-18\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Clinical Transplantation\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/ctr.15406\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"SURGERY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Clinical Transplantation","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/ctr.15406","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"SURGERY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的:较高的不确定性与较差的生活质量相关,并可能受到临床医生关于未来沟通的影响。我们确定了接受肺移植评估的患者如何体验不确定性以及临床医生对未来的沟通:我们采用横断面调查和半结构式访谈进行了一项收敛平行混合方法研究。在科罗拉多大学和华盛顿大学接受肺移植评估的患者回答了有关未来沟通的问题,并填写了米谢尔疾病不确定性量表-成人(MUIS-A;范围33-165,分数越高表示不确定性越大)。访谈采用内容分析法进行分析。在数据解释过程中整合了调查和访谈结果:共有 101 名患者完成了调查(回复率:47%)。12 名调查参与者完成了访谈。在调查中,大多数患者认为家庭角色的改变很重要(76%),但他们很少与临床医生讨论这个问题(31%)。大多数患者(86%)担心自己未来的生活质量,74%的患者表示,由于不知道未来会发生什么,他们无法制定计划。MUIS-A 的平均得分为 85.5(标准差为 15.3)。访谈揭示了三个主题:(1)未来的不确定性令参与者苦恼;(2)参与者希望从临床医生那里获得实用信息;(3)参与者的沟通偏好各不相同:结论:参与者经历了不确定性带来的痛苦,并希望获得有关未来的信息。对参与者来说重要的沟通主题并不总是能得到医生的关注。临床医生应解决慢性肺病和肺移植如何直接影响患者生活的问题,并支持患者应对不确定性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Uncertainty and Communication Preferences Among Patients Undergoing Lung Transplant Evaluation: A Mixed-Methods Study

Objective

Higher uncertainty is associated with poorer quality of life and may be impacted by clinician communication about the future. We determined how patients undergoing lung transplant evaluation experience uncertainty and communication about the future from clinicians.

Methods

We performed a convergent parallel mixed-methods study using a cross-sectional survey and semistructured interviews. Patients undergoing lung transplant evaluation at the University of Colorado and the University of Washington answered questions about future communication and completed the Mishel Uncertainty in Illness Scale-Adult (MUIS-A; range 33–165, higher scores indicate more uncertainty). Interviews were analyzed using content analysis. Integration of survey and interview results occurred during data interpretation.

Results

A total of 101 patients completed the survey (response rate: 47%). Twelve survey participants completed interviews. In the survey, most patients identified changing family roles as important (76%), which was infrequently discussed with clinicians (31%). Most patients (86%) worried about the quality of their life in the future, and 74% said that not knowing what to expect in the future prevented them from making plans. The mean MUIS-A score was 85.5 (standard deviation 15.3). Interviews revealed three themes: (1) uncertainty of the future distresses participants; (2) participants want practical information from clinicians; and (3) communication preferences vary among participants.

Conclusion

Participants experienced distressing uncertainty and wanted information about the future. Communication topics that were important to participants were not always addressed by physicians. Clinicians should address how chronic lung disease and lung transplant can directly impact patients’ lives and support patients to cope with uncertainty.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Clinical Transplantation
Clinical Transplantation 医学-外科
CiteScore
3.70
自引率
4.80%
发文量
286
审稿时长
2 months
期刊介绍: Clinical Transplantation: The Journal of Clinical and Translational Research aims to serve as a channel of rapid communication for all those involved in the care of patients who require, or have had, organ or tissue transplants, including: kidney, intestine, liver, pancreas, islets, heart, heart valves, lung, bone marrow, cornea, skin, bone, and cartilage, viable or stored. Published monthly, Clinical Transplantation’s scope is focused on the complete spectrum of present transplant therapies, as well as also those that are experimental or may become possible in future. Topics include: Immunology and immunosuppression; Patient preparation; Social, ethical, and psychological issues; Complications, short- and long-term results; Artificial organs; Donation and preservation of organ and tissue; Translational studies; Advances in tissue typing; Updates on transplant pathology;. Clinical and translational studies are particularly welcome, as well as focused reviews. Full-length papers and short communications are invited. Clinical reviews are encouraged, as well as seminal papers in basic science which might lead to immediate clinical application. Prominence is regularly given to the results of cooperative surveys conducted by the organ and tissue transplant registries. Clinical Transplantation: The Journal of Clinical and Translational Research is essential reading for clinicians and researchers in the diverse field of transplantation: surgeons; clinical immunologists; cryobiologists; hematologists; gastroenterologists; hepatologists; pulmonologists; nephrologists; cardiologists; and endocrinologists. It will also be of interest to sociologists, psychologists, research workers, and to all health professionals whose combined efforts will improve the prognosis of transplant recipients.
期刊最新文献
ChatGPT Solving Complex Kidney Transplant Cases: A Comparative Study With Human Respondents Interplay of Donor–Recipient Relationship and Donor Race in Living Liver Donation in the United States Successful Kidney Transplantation Despite Therapeutic Anticoagulation—Effective Apixaban Elimination by Hemoadsorption Subclinical Pancreas Rejection on Protocol Biopsy Within the First Year of Simultaneous Pancreas Kidney Transplant External Validation of a Limited Sampling Strategy for the Estimation of Mycophenolic Acid Exposure Between Different Assay Methods: PETINIA and HPLC Methods
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1