大型临床队列中与心房颤动发病相关的新型睡眠表型特征

IF 8 1区 医学 Q1 CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS JACC. Clinical electrophysiology Pub Date : 2024-09-01 DOI:10.1016/j.jacep.2024.05.027
Catherine M. Heinzinger DO, MS , Brittany Lapin PhD, MPH , Nicolas R. Thompson MS , Yadi Li MEd , Alex Milinovich BA , Anna M. May MD, MS , Cinthya Pena Orbea MD , Michael Faulx MD , David R. Van Wagoner PhD , Mina K. Chung MD , Nancy Foldvary-Schaefer DO, MS , Reena Mehra MD, MS
{"title":"大型临床队列中与心房颤动发病相关的新型睡眠表型特征","authors":"Catherine M. Heinzinger DO, MS ,&nbsp;Brittany Lapin PhD, MPH ,&nbsp;Nicolas R. Thompson MS ,&nbsp;Yadi Li MEd ,&nbsp;Alex Milinovich BA ,&nbsp;Anna M. May MD, MS ,&nbsp;Cinthya Pena Orbea MD ,&nbsp;Michael Faulx MD ,&nbsp;David R. Van Wagoner PhD ,&nbsp;Mina K. Chung MD ,&nbsp;Nancy Foldvary-Schaefer DO, MS ,&nbsp;Reena Mehra MD, MS","doi":"10.1016/j.jacep.2024.05.027","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Background</h3><div>While sleep disorders are implicated in atrial fibrillation (AF), the interplay of physiologic alterations and symptoms remains unclear. Sleep-based phenotypes can account for this complexity and translate to actionable approaches to identify at-risk patients and therapeutic interventions.</div></div><div><h3>Objectives</h3><div>This study hypothesized discrete phenotypes of symptoms and polysomnography (PSG)-based data differ in relation to incident AF.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>Data from the STARLIT (sleep Signals, Testing, And Reports LInked to patient Traits) registry on Cleveland Clinic patients (≥18 years of age) who underwent PSG from November 27, 2004, to December 30,2015, were retrospectively examined. Phenotypes were identified using latent class analysis<span> of symptoms and PSG-based measures of sleep-disordered breathing and sleep architecture. Phenotypes were included as the primary predictor in a multivariable-adjusted Cox proportional hazard models for incident AF.</span></div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>In our cohort (N = 43,433, age 51.8 ± 14.5 years, 51.9% male, 74.9% White), 7.3% (n = 3,166) had baseline AF. Over a 7.6- ± 3.4-year follow-up period, 8.9% (n = 3,595) developed incident AF. Five phenotypes were identified. The hypoxia<span> subtype (n = 3,245) had 48% increased incident AF (HR: 1.48; 95% CI: 1.34-1.64), the apneas + arousals subtype (n = 4,592) had 22% increased incident AF (HR: 1.22; 95% CI: 1.10-1.35), and the short sleep + nonrapid eye movement<span> subtype (n = 6,126) had 11% increased incident AF (HR: 1.11; 95% CI: 1.01-1.22) compared with long sleep + rapid eye movement (n = 26,809), the reference group. The hypopneas subtype (n = 2,661) did not differ from reference (HR: 0.89; 95% CI: 0.77-1.03).</span></span></div></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><div><span>Consistent with prior evidence supporting hypoxia as an AF driver and cardiac risk of the sleepy phenotype, this constellation of symptoms and physiologic alterations illustrates vulnerability for AF development, providing potential value in enhancing our understanding of integrated sleep-specific symptoms and physiologic risk of atrial </span>arrhythmogenesis.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":14573,"journal":{"name":"JACC. Clinical electrophysiology","volume":"10 9","pages":"Pages 2074-2084"},"PeriodicalIF":8.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Novel Sleep Phenotypic Profiles Associated With Incident Atrial Fibrillation in a Large Clinical Cohort\",\"authors\":\"Catherine M. Heinzinger DO, MS ,&nbsp;Brittany Lapin PhD, MPH ,&nbsp;Nicolas R. Thompson MS ,&nbsp;Yadi Li MEd ,&nbsp;Alex Milinovich BA ,&nbsp;Anna M. May MD, MS ,&nbsp;Cinthya Pena Orbea MD ,&nbsp;Michael Faulx MD ,&nbsp;David R. Van Wagoner PhD ,&nbsp;Mina K. Chung MD ,&nbsp;Nancy Foldvary-Schaefer DO, MS ,&nbsp;Reena Mehra MD, MS\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.jacep.2024.05.027\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><h3>Background</h3><div>While sleep disorders are implicated in atrial fibrillation (AF), the interplay of physiologic alterations and symptoms remains unclear. Sleep-based phenotypes can account for this complexity and translate to actionable approaches to identify at-risk patients and therapeutic interventions.</div></div><div><h3>Objectives</h3><div>This study hypothesized discrete phenotypes of symptoms and polysomnography (PSG)-based data differ in relation to incident AF.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>Data from the STARLIT (sleep Signals, Testing, And Reports LInked to patient Traits) registry on Cleveland Clinic patients (≥18 years of age) who underwent PSG from November 27, 2004, to December 30,2015, were retrospectively examined. Phenotypes were identified using latent class analysis<span> of symptoms and PSG-based measures of sleep-disordered breathing and sleep architecture. Phenotypes were included as the primary predictor in a multivariable-adjusted Cox proportional hazard models for incident AF.</span></div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>In our cohort (N = 43,433, age 51.8 ± 14.5 years, 51.9% male, 74.9% White), 7.3% (n = 3,166) had baseline AF. Over a 7.6- ± 3.4-year follow-up period, 8.9% (n = 3,595) developed incident AF. Five phenotypes were identified. The hypoxia<span> subtype (n = 3,245) had 48% increased incident AF (HR: 1.48; 95% CI: 1.34-1.64), the apneas + arousals subtype (n = 4,592) had 22% increased incident AF (HR: 1.22; 95% CI: 1.10-1.35), and the short sleep + nonrapid eye movement<span> subtype (n = 6,126) had 11% increased incident AF (HR: 1.11; 95% CI: 1.01-1.22) compared with long sleep + rapid eye movement (n = 26,809), the reference group. The hypopneas subtype (n = 2,661) did not differ from reference (HR: 0.89; 95% CI: 0.77-1.03).</span></span></div></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><div><span>Consistent with prior evidence supporting hypoxia as an AF driver and cardiac risk of the sleepy phenotype, this constellation of symptoms and physiologic alterations illustrates vulnerability for AF development, providing potential value in enhancing our understanding of integrated sleep-specific symptoms and physiologic risk of atrial </span>arrhythmogenesis.</div></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":14573,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"JACC. Clinical electrophysiology\",\"volume\":\"10 9\",\"pages\":\"Pages 2074-2084\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":8.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-09-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"JACC. Clinical electrophysiology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2405500X24004511\",\"RegionNum\":1,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"JACC. Clinical electrophysiology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2405500X24004511","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:虽然睡眠障碍与心房颤动(房颤)有关,但生理改变和症状之间的相互作用仍不清楚。基于睡眠的表型可以解释这种复杂性,并转化为识别高危患者和治疗干预的可行方法:本研究假设症状的离散表型和基于多导睡眠图(PSG)的数据与房颤事件的关系有所不同:方法:对克利夫兰诊所患者(≥18 岁)在 2004 年 11 月 27 日至 2015 年 12 月 30 日期间接受 PSG 检查的 STARLIT(与患者特征相关的睡眠信号、测试和报告)登记数据进行了回顾性研究。通过对症状和基于 PSG 的睡眠呼吸障碍和睡眠结构测量进行潜类分析,确定了表型。表型被作为主要预测因素纳入了房颤事件的多变量调整 Cox 比例危险模型:在我们的队列中(N = 43,433 人,年龄 51.8 ± 14.5 岁,51.9% 为男性,74.9% 为白人),7.3%(n = 3,166 人)有基线房颤。在 7.6 ± 3.4 年的随访期间,8.9% 的患者(n = 3,595 例)发展为偶发性房颤。研究发现了五种表型。缺氧亚型(n = 3,245)的房颤发病率增加了 48%(HR:1.48;95% CI:1.34-1.64),呼吸暂停+唤醒亚型(n = 4,592)的房颤发病率增加了 22%(HR:1.22;95% CI:1.10-1.35),睡眠时间短+唤醒亚型(n = 4,592)的房颤发病率增加了 22%(HR:1.22;95% CI:1.10-1.35)。35),短睡眠+非快速眼动亚型(n = 6 126)与参照组长睡眠+快速眼动(n = 26 809)相比,房颤发生率增加了 11%(HR:1.11;95% CI:1.01-1.22)。低通气亚型(n = 2,661)与参照组没有差异(HR:0.89;95% CI:0.77-1.03):与之前支持缺氧作为房颤驱动因素和嗜睡表型的心脏风险的证据一致,这种症状和生理改变的组合说明了房颤发展的脆弱性,为增强我们对综合睡眠特异性症状和房性心律失常发生的生理风险的理解提供了潜在价值。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Novel Sleep Phenotypic Profiles Associated With Incident Atrial Fibrillation in a Large Clinical Cohort

Background

While sleep disorders are implicated in atrial fibrillation (AF), the interplay of physiologic alterations and symptoms remains unclear. Sleep-based phenotypes can account for this complexity and translate to actionable approaches to identify at-risk patients and therapeutic interventions.

Objectives

This study hypothesized discrete phenotypes of symptoms and polysomnography (PSG)-based data differ in relation to incident AF.

Methods

Data from the STARLIT (sleep Signals, Testing, And Reports LInked to patient Traits) registry on Cleveland Clinic patients (≥18 years of age) who underwent PSG from November 27, 2004, to December 30,2015, were retrospectively examined. Phenotypes were identified using latent class analysis of symptoms and PSG-based measures of sleep-disordered breathing and sleep architecture. Phenotypes were included as the primary predictor in a multivariable-adjusted Cox proportional hazard models for incident AF.

Results

In our cohort (N = 43,433, age 51.8 ± 14.5 years, 51.9% male, 74.9% White), 7.3% (n = 3,166) had baseline AF. Over a 7.6- ± 3.4-year follow-up period, 8.9% (n = 3,595) developed incident AF. Five phenotypes were identified. The hypoxia subtype (n = 3,245) had 48% increased incident AF (HR: 1.48; 95% CI: 1.34-1.64), the apneas + arousals subtype (n = 4,592) had 22% increased incident AF (HR: 1.22; 95% CI: 1.10-1.35), and the short sleep + nonrapid eye movement subtype (n = 6,126) had 11% increased incident AF (HR: 1.11; 95% CI: 1.01-1.22) compared with long sleep + rapid eye movement (n = 26,809), the reference group. The hypopneas subtype (n = 2,661) did not differ from reference (HR: 0.89; 95% CI: 0.77-1.03).

Conclusions

Consistent with prior evidence supporting hypoxia as an AF driver and cardiac risk of the sleepy phenotype, this constellation of symptoms and physiologic alterations illustrates vulnerability for AF development, providing potential value in enhancing our understanding of integrated sleep-specific symptoms and physiologic risk of atrial arrhythmogenesis.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
JACC. Clinical electrophysiology
JACC. Clinical electrophysiology CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS-
CiteScore
10.30
自引率
5.70%
发文量
250
期刊介绍: JACC: Clinical Electrophysiology is one of a family of specialist journals launched by the renowned Journal of the American College of Cardiology (JACC). It encompasses all aspects of the epidemiology, pathogenesis, diagnosis and treatment of cardiac arrhythmias. Submissions of original research and state-of-the-art reviews from cardiology, cardiovascular surgery, neurology, outcomes research, and related fields are encouraged. Experimental and preclinical work that directly relates to diagnostic or therapeutic interventions are also encouraged. In general, case reports will not be considered for publication.
期刊最新文献
Epilepsy and Cardiac Arrhythmias: A State-of-the-Art Review. Lead Integrity and Failure Evaluation in Left Bundle Branch Area Pacing (LIFE-LBBAP) Study. Home Sotalol Initiation for the Management of Atrial and Ventricular Arrhythmias Using Remote Electrocardiographic Monitoring. A Novel Computational Platform for Optimizing Synergistic Drug Combinations for Cardioversion of Atrial Fibrillation. Ventricular Tachycardia Ablation in the Emergency Setting: Walking on Thin Ice.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1