Jon Stavres, Anabelle Vallecillo-Bustos, Ta’Quoris A. Newsome, Ryan S. Aultman, Caleb F. Brandner, Austin J. Graybeal
{"title":"代谢综合征患者对冷加压试验的血流动力学反应:一项多种族成人样本的病例对照研究。","authors":"Jon Stavres, Anabelle Vallecillo-Bustos, Ta’Quoris A. Newsome, Ryan S. Aultman, Caleb F. Brandner, Austin J. Graybeal","doi":"10.1038/s41371-024-00938-x","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Previous research shows that exercise pressor and metaboreflex responses are significantly exaggerated in individuals with metabolic syndrome, but it is unclear if these exaggerated responses extend to the cold pressor test (CPT). This study tested the hypothesis that, contrary to previously reported exaggerated responses during exercise, CPT responses would not be significantly exaggerated in individuals with MetS compared to matched controls. Eleven individuals with MetS and eleven control participants matched by age, race, sex, and ethnicity completed a cardiometabolic prescreening and a CPT. Each CPT required participants to immerse their hand in ice water for two minutes while beat-by-beat blood pressure, heart rate (HR), and leg blood flow (LBF) were continuously measured. Leg vascular conductance (LVC) was calculated as LBF divided by mean arterial pressure (MAP). The precent changes in MAP, systolic blood pressure (SBP), diastolic blood pressure (DBP), HR, LBF, and LVC were compared across time (BL vs. Minutes 1 and 2 of CPT) and between groups (MetS vs. Control) using repeated measures analyses of variance. As expected, MAP (f = 32.11, p < 0.001), SBP (f = 23.18, p < 0.001), DBP (f = 40.39, p < 0.001), and HR (f = 31.81, p < 0.001) increased during the CPT, and LBF (f = 4.75, p = 0.014) and LVC (f = 13.88, p < 0.001) decreased. However, no significant main effects of group or group by time interactions were observed (f ≤ 0.391, p ≥ 0.539). These findings indicate that the hemodynamic responses to the CPT are not significantly exaggerated in MetS, and therefore, previous reports of exaggerated exercise pressor and metaboreflex responses in MetS cannot be attributed to generalized sympathetic overexcitability.","PeriodicalId":16070,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Human Hypertension","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":2.7000,"publicationDate":"2024-07-17","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Hemodynamic responses to the cold pressor test in individuals with metabolic syndrome: a case-control study in a multiracial sample of adults\",\"authors\":\"Jon Stavres, Anabelle Vallecillo-Bustos, Ta’Quoris A. Newsome, Ryan S. Aultman, Caleb F. Brandner, Austin J. Graybeal\",\"doi\":\"10.1038/s41371-024-00938-x\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Previous research shows that exercise pressor and metaboreflex responses are significantly exaggerated in individuals with metabolic syndrome, but it is unclear if these exaggerated responses extend to the cold pressor test (CPT). This study tested the hypothesis that, contrary to previously reported exaggerated responses during exercise, CPT responses would not be significantly exaggerated in individuals with MetS compared to matched controls. Eleven individuals with MetS and eleven control participants matched by age, race, sex, and ethnicity completed a cardiometabolic prescreening and a CPT. Each CPT required participants to immerse their hand in ice water for two minutes while beat-by-beat blood pressure, heart rate (HR), and leg blood flow (LBF) were continuously measured. Leg vascular conductance (LVC) was calculated as LBF divided by mean arterial pressure (MAP). The precent changes in MAP, systolic blood pressure (SBP), diastolic blood pressure (DBP), HR, LBF, and LVC were compared across time (BL vs. Minutes 1 and 2 of CPT) and between groups (MetS vs. Control) using repeated measures analyses of variance. As expected, MAP (f = 32.11, p < 0.001), SBP (f = 23.18, p < 0.001), DBP (f = 40.39, p < 0.001), and HR (f = 31.81, p < 0.001) increased during the CPT, and LBF (f = 4.75, p = 0.014) and LVC (f = 13.88, p < 0.001) decreased. However, no significant main effects of group or group by time interactions were observed (f ≤ 0.391, p ≥ 0.539). These findings indicate that the hemodynamic responses to the CPT are not significantly exaggerated in MetS, and therefore, previous reports of exaggerated exercise pressor and metaboreflex responses in MetS cannot be attributed to generalized sympathetic overexcitability.\",\"PeriodicalId\":16070,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Human Hypertension\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.7000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-07-17\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Human Hypertension\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.nature.com/articles/s41371-024-00938-x\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"PERIPHERAL VASCULAR DISEASE\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Human Hypertension","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.nature.com/articles/s41371-024-00938-x","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"PERIPHERAL VASCULAR DISEASE","Score":null,"Total":0}
Hemodynamic responses to the cold pressor test in individuals with metabolic syndrome: a case-control study in a multiracial sample of adults
Previous research shows that exercise pressor and metaboreflex responses are significantly exaggerated in individuals with metabolic syndrome, but it is unclear if these exaggerated responses extend to the cold pressor test (CPT). This study tested the hypothesis that, contrary to previously reported exaggerated responses during exercise, CPT responses would not be significantly exaggerated in individuals with MetS compared to matched controls. Eleven individuals with MetS and eleven control participants matched by age, race, sex, and ethnicity completed a cardiometabolic prescreening and a CPT. Each CPT required participants to immerse their hand in ice water for two minutes while beat-by-beat blood pressure, heart rate (HR), and leg blood flow (LBF) were continuously measured. Leg vascular conductance (LVC) was calculated as LBF divided by mean arterial pressure (MAP). The precent changes in MAP, systolic blood pressure (SBP), diastolic blood pressure (DBP), HR, LBF, and LVC were compared across time (BL vs. Minutes 1 and 2 of CPT) and between groups (MetS vs. Control) using repeated measures analyses of variance. As expected, MAP (f = 32.11, p < 0.001), SBP (f = 23.18, p < 0.001), DBP (f = 40.39, p < 0.001), and HR (f = 31.81, p < 0.001) increased during the CPT, and LBF (f = 4.75, p = 0.014) and LVC (f = 13.88, p < 0.001) decreased. However, no significant main effects of group or group by time interactions were observed (f ≤ 0.391, p ≥ 0.539). These findings indicate that the hemodynamic responses to the CPT are not significantly exaggerated in MetS, and therefore, previous reports of exaggerated exercise pressor and metaboreflex responses in MetS cannot be attributed to generalized sympathetic overexcitability.
期刊介绍:
Journal of Human Hypertension is published monthly and is of interest to health care professionals who deal with hypertension (specialists, internists, primary care physicians) and public health workers. We believe that our patients benefit from robust scientific data that are based on well conducted clinical trials. We also believe that basic sciences are the foundations on which we build our knowledge of clinical conditions and their management. Towards this end, although we are primarily a clinical based journal, we also welcome suitable basic sciences studies that promote our understanding of human hypertension.
The journal aims to perform the dual role of increasing knowledge in the field of high blood pressure as well as improving the standard of care of patients. The editors will consider for publication all suitable papers dealing directly or indirectly with clinical aspects of hypertension, including but not limited to epidemiology, pathophysiology, therapeutics and basic sciences involving human subjects or tissues. We also consider papers from all specialties such as ophthalmology, cardiology, nephrology, obstetrics and stroke medicine that deal with the various aspects of hypertension and its complications.