超声引导下斜方肌肋间和锯肌下阻滞对接受动力辅助联合吸脂术和腺体拉通切除术以进行乳房定义和重塑的男性患者围手术期镇痛的效果。

IF 2.9 3区 医学 Q1 ANESTHESIOLOGY Minerva anestesiologica Pub Date : 2024-07-01 DOI:10.23736/S0375-9393.24.17985-0
Amr S Wahdan, George E Loza, Hasan A Alayyaf, Wessam S Wahdan, Atef K Salama, Mennatallah M Mohamed
{"title":"超声引导下斜方肌肋间和锯肌下阻滞对接受动力辅助联合吸脂术和腺体拉通切除术以进行乳房定义和重塑的男性患者围手术期镇痛的效果。","authors":"Amr S Wahdan, George E Loza, Hasan A Alayyaf, Wessam S Wahdan, Atef K Salama, Mennatallah M Mohamed","doi":"10.23736/S0375-9393.24.17985-0","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>The newly introduced ultrasound guided interfacial rhomboid intercostal and sub-serratus (RISS) block technique demonstrated promising efficacy in managing perioperative pain among patients undergoing abdominal and thoracic procedures. Thus, this study investigated the efficiency of bilateral ultrasound-guided RISS (US-RISS) as a perioperative pain control technique in male subjects receiving gynecomastia surgery.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This prospective randomized study involved sixty patients who underwent gynecomastia surgery. Individuals were randomly divided into two groups: the RISS group (N.=30) and the control group (N.=30). After anesthesia induction, the patients received bilateral US-RISS using 40 mL of 0.25% levobupivacaine, or conventional intravenous analgesia with no intervention, respectively. The primary outcome was the overall morphine consumption in 24 hours, and the secondary endpoints involved the time elapsed till rescue analgesia was requested, the quality of recovery after 24 hours and side effects' incidence.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Morphine consumption was noticeably decreased in the RISS group compared to the control group, with 14.07±4.91 mg and 35.83±1.70 mg mean values, respectively (P<0.001). Furthermore, in the RISS group, the initial rescue analgesia request occurred significantly later than in the control group, with mean values of 15.58±1.41 hours and 0.96±0.63 hours, respectively (P<0.001). Additionally, within the RISS group, there was a high quality of recovery observed, with a low incidence of opioid-related adverse events in comparison to the control group.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Bilateral US-RISS block is a beneficial intervention in gynecomastia surgery for pain management and improves the quality of recovery.</p>","PeriodicalId":18522,"journal":{"name":"Minerva anestesiologica","volume":"90 7-8","pages":"626-634"},"PeriodicalIF":2.9000,"publicationDate":"2024-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Effectiveness of ultrasound-guided rhomboid intercostal and sub-serratus block for perioperative analgesia in male patients undergoing combined power-assisted liposuction with pull-through excision of the gland for breast definition and reshaping.\",\"authors\":\"Amr S Wahdan, George E Loza, Hasan A Alayyaf, Wessam S Wahdan, Atef K Salama, Mennatallah M Mohamed\",\"doi\":\"10.23736/S0375-9393.24.17985-0\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>The newly introduced ultrasound guided interfacial rhomboid intercostal and sub-serratus (RISS) block technique demonstrated promising efficacy in managing perioperative pain among patients undergoing abdominal and thoracic procedures. Thus, this study investigated the efficiency of bilateral ultrasound-guided RISS (US-RISS) as a perioperative pain control technique in male subjects receiving gynecomastia surgery.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This prospective randomized study involved sixty patients who underwent gynecomastia surgery. Individuals were randomly divided into two groups: the RISS group (N.=30) and the control group (N.=30). After anesthesia induction, the patients received bilateral US-RISS using 40 mL of 0.25% levobupivacaine, or conventional intravenous analgesia with no intervention, respectively. The primary outcome was the overall morphine consumption in 24 hours, and the secondary endpoints involved the time elapsed till rescue analgesia was requested, the quality of recovery after 24 hours and side effects' incidence.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Morphine consumption was noticeably decreased in the RISS group compared to the control group, with 14.07±4.91 mg and 35.83±1.70 mg mean values, respectively (P<0.001). Furthermore, in the RISS group, the initial rescue analgesia request occurred significantly later than in the control group, with mean values of 15.58±1.41 hours and 0.96±0.63 hours, respectively (P<0.001). Additionally, within the RISS group, there was a high quality of recovery observed, with a low incidence of opioid-related adverse events in comparison to the control group.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Bilateral US-RISS block is a beneficial intervention in gynecomastia surgery for pain management and improves the quality of recovery.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":18522,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Minerva anestesiologica\",\"volume\":\"90 7-8\",\"pages\":\"626-634\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.9000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-07-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Minerva anestesiologica\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.23736/S0375-9393.24.17985-0\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"ANESTHESIOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Minerva anestesiologica","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.23736/S0375-9393.24.17985-0","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ANESTHESIOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:新近推出的超声引导下肋间肌和剑突下肌(RISS)阻滞技术在控制腹部和胸部手术患者围手术期疼痛方面具有良好的疗效。因此,本研究探讨了在接受妇科整形手术的男性受试者中使用双侧超声引导下肋间肌和冈下肌阻滞(US-RISS)作为围手术期疼痛控制技术的有效性:这项前瞻性随机研究涉及 60 名接受妇科整形手术的患者。患者被随机分为两组:RISS 组(30 人)和对照组(30 人)。麻醉诱导后,患者分别接受了使用 40 毫升 0.25% 左布比卡因的双侧 US-RISS 或无干预的常规静脉镇痛。主要结果是 24 小时内的总体吗啡消耗量,次要终点包括请求镇痛抢救的时间、24 小时后的恢复质量和副作用发生率:结果:与对照组相比,RISS 组的吗啡消耗量明显减少,平均值分别为(14.07±4.91)毫克和(35.83±1.70)毫克(PC 结论:RISS 阻滞是一种有效的双侧 US-RISS 阻滞方法:双侧 US-RISS 阻滞是妇科整形手术中一种有益的止痛干预措施,可提高术后恢复质量。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Effectiveness of ultrasound-guided rhomboid intercostal and sub-serratus block for perioperative analgesia in male patients undergoing combined power-assisted liposuction with pull-through excision of the gland for breast definition and reshaping.

Background: The newly introduced ultrasound guided interfacial rhomboid intercostal and sub-serratus (RISS) block technique demonstrated promising efficacy in managing perioperative pain among patients undergoing abdominal and thoracic procedures. Thus, this study investigated the efficiency of bilateral ultrasound-guided RISS (US-RISS) as a perioperative pain control technique in male subjects receiving gynecomastia surgery.

Methods: This prospective randomized study involved sixty patients who underwent gynecomastia surgery. Individuals were randomly divided into two groups: the RISS group (N.=30) and the control group (N.=30). After anesthesia induction, the patients received bilateral US-RISS using 40 mL of 0.25% levobupivacaine, or conventional intravenous analgesia with no intervention, respectively. The primary outcome was the overall morphine consumption in 24 hours, and the secondary endpoints involved the time elapsed till rescue analgesia was requested, the quality of recovery after 24 hours and side effects' incidence.

Results: Morphine consumption was noticeably decreased in the RISS group compared to the control group, with 14.07±4.91 mg and 35.83±1.70 mg mean values, respectively (P<0.001). Furthermore, in the RISS group, the initial rescue analgesia request occurred significantly later than in the control group, with mean values of 15.58±1.41 hours and 0.96±0.63 hours, respectively (P<0.001). Additionally, within the RISS group, there was a high quality of recovery observed, with a low incidence of opioid-related adverse events in comparison to the control group.

Conclusions: Bilateral US-RISS block is a beneficial intervention in gynecomastia surgery for pain management and improves the quality of recovery.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Minerva anestesiologica
Minerva anestesiologica 医学-麻醉学
CiteScore
4.50
自引率
21.90%
发文量
367
审稿时长
4-8 weeks
期刊介绍: Minerva Anestesiologica is the journal of the Italian National Society of Anaesthesia, Analgesia, Resuscitation, and Intensive Care. Minerva Anestesiologica publishes scientific papers on Anesthesiology, Intensive care, Analgesia, Perioperative Medicine and related fields. Manuscripts are expected to comply with the instructions to authors which conform to the Uniform Requirements for Manuscripts Submitted to Biomedical Editors by the International Committee of Medical Journal Editors.
期刊最新文献
Assessment of the organ function as the primary intention of clinical reasoning applied to the critically ill patient. Analgesic efficacy of ultrasound-guided rhomboid intercostal block versus serratus plane block in modified radical mastectomy: a prospective randomized controlled study. Renal resistive index assessment by intraoperative transesophageal echocardiography is associated with acute kidney injury after cardiac surgery: a prospective observational study. Ultrasonography versus conventional palpation for epidural analgesia in pediatrics undergoing midabdominal urological operations: a randomized clinical trial. Comparison of remimazolam and propofol on postoperative subjective quality of recovery in patients undergoing general anesthesia: a meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1