Junichi Suganuma , Kozo Ueta , Koji Nakanishi , Yumi Ikeda , Shu Morioka
{"title":"安静站立时自主控制与有意识平衡处理之间的差异","authors":"Junichi Suganuma , Kozo Ueta , Koji Nakanishi , Yumi Ikeda , Shu Morioka","doi":"10.1016/j.neulet.2024.137900","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>The mechanism by which postural threat induced by standing at a high height causes a decrease in the amplitude and an increase in the frequency of postural sway might involve voluntary control (VC) to avoid swaying, rather than conscious balance processing, in which postural threat directs conscious balance processing. This study aimed to clarify the differences between VC and conscious balance processing during quiet standing. Twenty-seven healthy young adults were instructed to stand with their feet placed together and keep their eyes open. The standing task was performed under three standing conditions: relaxed, VC, and high-conscious movement processing (high-CMP). The center of pressure in the anteroposterior (AP) and mediolateral (ML) directions was measured using a stabilometer to assess differences in postural control. The results indicated that the mean power frequency (MPF) ML and high frequency (HF) ML were higher in the VC condition than in the high-CMP condition. In the VC and high-CMP conditions, compared with the relaxed condition, MPF AP was higher, whereas the root mean square AP and low frequency AP were lower. These results show that the sway amplitude is lower, and the frequency is higher in both the VC and high-CMP conditions compared with those in the relaxed condition; however, the frequency is higher in the VC condition than in the high-CMP condition, suggesting that the VC condition is similar to postural control under the postural threat condition.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":19290,"journal":{"name":"Neuroscience Letters","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":2.5000,"publicationDate":"2024-07-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Difference between voluntary control and conscious balance processing during quiet standing\",\"authors\":\"Junichi Suganuma , Kozo Ueta , Koji Nakanishi , Yumi Ikeda , Shu Morioka\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.neulet.2024.137900\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><p>The mechanism by which postural threat induced by standing at a high height causes a decrease in the amplitude and an increase in the frequency of postural sway might involve voluntary control (VC) to avoid swaying, rather than conscious balance processing, in which postural threat directs conscious balance processing. This study aimed to clarify the differences between VC and conscious balance processing during quiet standing. Twenty-seven healthy young adults were instructed to stand with their feet placed together and keep their eyes open. The standing task was performed under three standing conditions: relaxed, VC, and high-conscious movement processing (high-CMP). The center of pressure in the anteroposterior (AP) and mediolateral (ML) directions was measured using a stabilometer to assess differences in postural control. The results indicated that the mean power frequency (MPF) ML and high frequency (HF) ML were higher in the VC condition than in the high-CMP condition. In the VC and high-CMP conditions, compared with the relaxed condition, MPF AP was higher, whereas the root mean square AP and low frequency AP were lower. These results show that the sway amplitude is lower, and the frequency is higher in both the VC and high-CMP conditions compared with those in the relaxed condition; however, the frequency is higher in the VC condition than in the high-CMP condition, suggesting that the VC condition is similar to postural control under the postural threat condition.</p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":19290,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Neuroscience Letters\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.5000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-07-15\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Neuroscience Letters\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0304394024002787\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"NEUROSCIENCES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Neuroscience Letters","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0304394024002787","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"NEUROSCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
摘要
高处站立所引起的姿势威胁导致姿势摇摆幅度减小和频率增加的机制可能涉及避免摇摆的自主控制(VC),而不是姿势威胁指导有意识平衡处理的有意识平衡处理。本研究旨在阐明安静站立时自主控制和有意识平衡处理之间的差异。研究人员要求 27 名健康的年轻人双脚并拢站立并睁大眼睛。站立任务在三种站立条件下进行:放松、VC 和高意识运动处理(高 CMP)。使用稳定计测量前胸(AP)和内外侧(ML)方向的压力中心,以评估姿势控制的差异。结果表明,VC 条件下的平均功率频率 (MPF) ML 和高频率 (HF) ML 均高于高CMP 条件下的平均功率频率 (MPF) ML 和高频率 (HF) ML。在 VC 和高CMP 条件下,与放松条件相比,MPF AP 较高,而均方根 AP 和低频 AP 较低。这些结果表明,与放松条件相比,VC 和高CMP 条件下的摇摆幅度较低,频率较高;但 VC 条件下的频率高于高CMP 条件,这表明 VC 条件与姿势威胁条件下的姿势控制相似。
Difference between voluntary control and conscious balance processing during quiet standing
The mechanism by which postural threat induced by standing at a high height causes a decrease in the amplitude and an increase in the frequency of postural sway might involve voluntary control (VC) to avoid swaying, rather than conscious balance processing, in which postural threat directs conscious balance processing. This study aimed to clarify the differences between VC and conscious balance processing during quiet standing. Twenty-seven healthy young adults were instructed to stand with their feet placed together and keep their eyes open. The standing task was performed under three standing conditions: relaxed, VC, and high-conscious movement processing (high-CMP). The center of pressure in the anteroposterior (AP) and mediolateral (ML) directions was measured using a stabilometer to assess differences in postural control. The results indicated that the mean power frequency (MPF) ML and high frequency (HF) ML were higher in the VC condition than in the high-CMP condition. In the VC and high-CMP conditions, compared with the relaxed condition, MPF AP was higher, whereas the root mean square AP and low frequency AP were lower. These results show that the sway amplitude is lower, and the frequency is higher in both the VC and high-CMP conditions compared with those in the relaxed condition; however, the frequency is higher in the VC condition than in the high-CMP condition, suggesting that the VC condition is similar to postural control under the postural threat condition.
期刊介绍:
Neuroscience Letters is devoted to the rapid publication of short, high-quality papers of interest to the broad community of neuroscientists. Only papers which will make a significant addition to the literature in the field will be published. Papers in all areas of neuroscience - molecular, cellular, developmental, systems, behavioral and cognitive, as well as computational - will be considered for publication. Submission of laboratory investigations that shed light on disease mechanisms is encouraged. Special Issues, edited by Guest Editors to cover new and rapidly-moving areas, will include invited mini-reviews. Occasional mini-reviews in especially timely areas will be considered for publication, without invitation, outside of Special Issues; these un-solicited mini-reviews can be submitted without invitation but must be of very high quality. Clinical studies will also be published if they provide new information about organization or actions of the nervous system, or provide new insights into the neurobiology of disease. NSL does not publish case reports.